Fri 15 Aug 2008

Every year during the 3rd week of August we see many pieces about Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Most of these are of ‘Bangabandhuke jemon dekhechi’ type, though some do contain rare pieces of 1970s articles and declassified government documents. Last August, angry blogger Dhaka Shohor wrote a very different piece that describes how the post-1970s generation views the national leader.
In addition to a very violent coup, 15 August also marks partition and the end of the empire in the subcontinent - events that cannot be separated from the shaping of our national identity. Identities can of course get really confusing - Bangladeshi / Bengali Muslim / Muslim / Bengali / Indian / Ghoti / Bangal - it’s not always clear where one ends and the other begins. Dhaka Shohor’s post also shows how the post-1970s generation - born in the free country, with no hang ups about our neighbours or former compatriots, comfortable in our surrounds, focussed on our needs, and at ease with the world - tackles these identity issues.
We’ve lamented about there being no clear articulation of what it means to be a Bangladeshi. May be this articulation will come from some future leader. Not everyone from his generation is as articulate as Dhaka Shohor, not everyone has the same opportunities. But while words may vary, the message is probably the same. And that, much more than the lamenting of the past, is why we reproduce his post below.
Ekti Mujiburer thekey
I don’t like simple stories, but I’ll make an exception for the one that follows because even this is an improvement from the over-simplified bullshit we are asked to believe by political parties and their embedded intellectuals. If you disagree on the details, remember these are simplified stories.
On Monday, the 82nd birth anniversary of Tajuddin Ahmed came and went by without making much of a noise. Can we expect a grand celebration of his birth anniversary one day? Does he not deserve one? Is his memory fading away from our collective minds? Will our next generation remember him at all?



The following was published in Time right after the liberation war victory. It has lots of interesting things about him about his pre-71 life which often gets lost because of the discussion on the last three years of his life. How many of you know that he was in jail for political reasons for 10 and a half years of his 55 year life?

