Thu 17 Jul 2008
Ban(?) on Sachalayatan and govt’s dalliance with Jamaat
Posted by khujeci_tomai under 1971 , Censorship , jamaat-e-islami
As of Tuesday afternoon, access to Sachalayatan.com has been blocked from Bangladesh. Right before this unofficial ban, Sachal (as the users of this site fondly call it) bloggers vehemently protested the attack on a war veteran by Jamaat e Islami activists at a “Liberation War” meeting. In one such article Faruk Wasif on Sachalatayan analyzes the incident: “These obstinate freedom fighters from the subaltern dare do what our seasonal “Sector Commanders” or the frogs of our Syphilis Society cannot.” The full article, that may have sealed the fate of Sachal in Bangladesh, has been translated below.
In the meantime New Age produced another stinging rebuke to the military controlled government for its kiddy glove approach towards Jamaat. Here is the blistering piece.
Listen to the old Freedom Fighter
by Faruk Wasif
[translated by Drishtipat.org]
The old freedom fighter, who was attacked at a “Liberation War”
meeting of the war criminals of Jamaat e Islami, this is his photo.
This is his interview, o Daily Shamokal readers.
Look closely at his face, his speech.
In the land of the 1971 liberation war, the great Sector Commanders
squeal like kittens as they demand justice. They do this only at
polite tea ceremonies at home. They cannot hold a meeting without TV
cameras and bottled mineral water. They go to the current illegal
occupiers of power and make gentle requests, “Sir, they are bad
people, sir. Please give us justice, sir.” They are the gentleman war
veterans who have reached sky-high wealth. Sitting on their perch,
they secretly hug the Jamaati war criminals and the Pakistan
supporting brother American power. In the midst of such a busy
schedule, they never have time to join the thousands of people who
went to the streets to block Saidi and Ghulam Azam’s meetings. Instead
of sending a protest rally, they send infiltrators. Whether that does
the trick or not, the media bonanza continues, the issue stays alive,
and in the afterlife they will fill the vote box.
Read the news, look at this man’s face. The man did not start shouting
at the Jamaat meeting. He felt cheated, walked out and started venting
his rage. No one called him, he was fired up on his own anger. The
journalists saw the opening and walked in, just as Jamaat workers
attacked him, and the news spread. Now we have the toasty hot news!
Now all the professional statement makers will lob their statement
bombs, where else but at newspaper offices? These people live to give
statements and get on the 9′o clock news!
But go back to the interview. If you have ever spoken to one of these
poverty-broken angry frustrated freedom fighters, you will know that
steady stare, that raised finger, that caged heat, which only a true
fighter still holds on to. His body is also a document, his language
is also a certificate. We have to read all this. My reading tells me
that this man will speak again. They are all waiting for one chance,
just one chance, to start the 1971 war again. They come to raise hell,
spread poison on the happy party, explode with the lava of their hate.
And us? All we can do is write a poem. At most!
The more you travel downwards in our classist society, the more this
hate [for war criminals], this obstinate rage. And in the upper
echelons, only honey and unity. At these high altitudes, all passions
have faded to grey from the sweet nectar of creature comforts. Fire
won’t catch here, only pleasures will flow. The sweet taste of money
and power gives them orgasms. And everyone knows, at the time of
orgasm, you forget whether under you is mother or grandmother, country
or land, 1971 or 1982. They too have forgotten everything. Even in
1971, they were whoring, cheating and enjoying—on this side and that
side of the border. Today they have split into many political parties
and are cooking up the same tricks of the trade. Have you notice, in
1971 no Awami League leader died in a Thana of Mafaswal?
So it goes. So our old freedom fighter wanders the streets. He will go
to the wrong meeting, the wrong gathering, the endless newspaper
offices. Suddenly he will fly into a rage at a tea shop and start
screaming. At home his wife and children will curse him and say “What
bloody independence war? What have you given us?” He will run out of
his house, again prick up his ears: is my mother, my country calling
me? His helpless wandering will be the juicy news for the media, he
will become a plaything for our complacent Sector Commanders. He will
be bought and sold by everybody. A few days later, after the fuss dies
down, the Islamists will come to his home. They will offer him money,
they will threaten to slit his throat. Even if he does not sell out,
he will be afraid for his family. He will lapse into silence. The
media and the gentlefolk will stop searching for him. They will go and
hunt another war veteran to sell. Business as usual.
But no matter how many times people try to sell them, they remain
unbroken. They will die, and in their place, from the subaltern, will
wake up new people— in Kansat, in Fulbari. The 27 corpses of Kansat,
the three teenage bodies of Fulbari, the villagers are still holding
on to their martyrdom. In the village, they call Fulbari “liberation
war”, they compare it to 1971. In this way, 1971 wakes up again and
again, not frozen as a dead history. The war will not end. A new
battle is ahead. Because 71 is not so cheap, so fragile.
The working class crossed the border and became refugees in 1971.
Today they roam around, inside their own country, as refugees. In 1971
there were 10 million refugees, and today there are 60/70 million
landless, living under the poverty line. They wander around all day,
ghosts among us. In 1971, that was the total population of Bangladesh!
People will organize again, along these lines of struggle. But
tragically, we might fail to recognize them. We may call them
hooligans, terrorists or Maoists. Even the dragon worshipper flees
when the dragon finally arrives.
There is no space for them in our genteel liberation war narrative.
And in their authentic liberation war, there is no companion, no
leader. But because these people still survive, even the question, the
possibility remains. We were reminded of this once again by an
unknown, dirt poor, carpenter. He is so incredibly weak—no money, no
party, no support, and yet he shook us to the core of our essence. He
raised all the questions we hide from. This power, only “they” have.
Because they have lost everything and realized, I have nothing left to
lose. That is why they can take risks. Even after war criminals beat
them, they shout “I will keep demanding justice.” They dare do what
our seasonal “Sector Commanders” or the frogs of our Syphilis Society
cannot.
July 17th, 2008 at 1:08 am
If sachalayatan is really blocked by BD govt, we must stay beside the sachalayatan authority. And I felt shame for the BD if it is really true.
July 17th, 2008 at 3:58 am
Were the blog admins warned of this by the govt? Somewhere in’s front page was removed the day following 1/11 because we were scared of SOE. Has anyone contacted the blog admin?
July 17th, 2008 at 5:33 am
Can’t express my anger enough! The military is so fond of forgetting that when the people will rise against them their guns and tanks will not be able to save them a bit.
July 17th, 2008 at 6:04 am
Excellent translation. Thanks for capturing the power and passion of the original piece.
July 17th, 2008 at 8:57 am
[...] ১, ২, ৩, ৪, ৫] These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]
July 17th, 2008 at 10:56 am
maybe someone who doesn’t like what the portal is up to, with a grudge is blocking it. its probably not a hard thing to do. it could be any number of things, many non government related.
bit self serving to use it as an excuse to blow off more angst at jamat while bringing in over romantisised views of kansat and fulbari.
July 17th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
well done, faruk wasif. i just hope the govt doesnt now come after the portal admins.
fugstar, does anybody take you seriously any more?
July 17th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
“bit self serving to use it as an excuse to blow off more angst at jamat while bringing in over romantisised views of kansat and fulbari.”
I don’t know Fugstar, but may be it has something to do with the fact that the commotion was triggered by JI actions? Or may be because the FF in question comes from the same stream as the people of Kansat/Fulbari (an ordinary citizen who is consistently repressed by political turmoil, rising prices, low regional growth and then finally, insult to his brave cause and bodily injury)?
And read the Sachal post on it being banned. Plus, which non-govt actor would want to do this to blog that gets under a thousand hits ?(stats from Rezwan bhai’s blog)
July 17th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Abaro boli: Jagoroner shomoy hoyeche. Rukhe dara-te hobe amader kei.
This is not just a ban of a blog. It’s the ban of a blog that denounced the beating of a Muktijudhha, that stood against Jamaat/Shibir oppression, if I may. I’m not just angry, I’m sad. I want to cry but I’m too angry. This is not the land for which we fought. These people who are responsible for killing so many freedom-fighters, are ready to do it again.
Amra ki KICHUI korte parbo na?
What I find especially awful is Jamaat’s rejoinder: http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=45691. They use religion to market their party, and they lie through their teeth like there’s no tomorrow. Which is probably true :S
July 17th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
[...] Unheard Voices and Voice of Bangladeshi Bloggers both report that a Bangla Blog Forum called Sachalaytan appears to be blocked in Bangladesh. Posted by Neha Viswanathan Share This [...]
July 17th, 2008 at 7:10 pm
officially it is not announced whether sachalayatan is banned or not . What we can do first is presserize the govt to unravel the truth and then take action properly.
July 17th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
That’s what I, personally, am afraid of - the unraveling of the truth. Because the ‘truth’ will be a technical mistake by some non-commital, non-responsible fellow, much much below the food chain. In fact, he won’t even BE on the food chain. Someone will say ’sorry for the inconvenience’ and that will be that. So, Imrul Kayes - there is no need for such truths, really. There is no time to wait. Because whether the govt banned the site or not is not THAT important in the greater scheme of things. The truth remains the truth: Jamaat is somehow being able to tweak the system in their favor. The banning of the Sachal blog is just a small part of it. But it gives you an inkling of the extent of their clout and power.
July 17th, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Regarding the title of this thread, with the exception of Sheikh Mujib (and I’m going chronologically here, not ideologically), which Bangladeshi PM / President / government has NOT had a “dalliance” with Jamaat?
July 18th, 2008 at 12:46 am
Udayan
Jamaat’s power and negotiating stance within the dalliance is only going up. And do not forget all is under a SOE so protests are quickly muzzled (by the army that muzzles everyone except Jamaat).
This attack would have caused city to go up in flames if not for SOE.
July 18th, 2008 at 12:58 am
A quick question, why are we so sure that it is simply not a hacking job or, dare I say, a technical glitch? I feel in the chronology of government’s priority, banning Sachalayatan would be way down the list. Even this platform may be a bit higher up in the list, if we do not mention the gala gali (aimed at razakars) marathon that goes on in a much bigger bangla site, somewhereinblog.net. In the same logic, New Age would have ben banned for publishig such a scathing rebuke of the government.
July 18th, 2008 at 2:11 am
Well, we could even argue that it’s an inside job to get publicity for the blog that barely gets a 1000 hits a day. And EVEN IF that IS the case, the issue remains the same - increasing power of the Jamaat-e-Islami.
July 18th, 2008 at 5:46 am
brilliant article. This entire government is jamaat controlled and a joke.
July 18th, 2008 at 7:26 am
It might help you to understand the scenario regarding Sachalayatan:
http://www.e-bangladesh.org/2008/07/18/sachalayatan-a-well-written-story-or-what/
July 18th, 2008 at 7:57 am
Sushanta,
ei bishal lekhata porar dhoirjo holo na because of the style and technical details. What is the summary? Is it intentional or not?
July 18th, 2008 at 9:49 am
There are many facts and figures. So reader should decide eta intenional ki na!
My stand is: if there is problem in BD GOVT end, whynt we prove it? There are many ways to prove it technically.
July 18th, 2008 at 10:21 am
Dear All,
My name is M. Sanjeeb Hossain. I am a law student at BRAC University. Before wasting further time I’ll get straight to the point. My friends and I have formed the group Anti Jamaat Front. Our current goal is very simple. keeping in mind that the Jamaat-Shibir followers have infiltrated into the major institutions in Bangladesh, openly and secretly, the members of the Anti Jamaat Front shall identify these people and compile lists of them. As these lists get complete one by one, the Anti Jamaat Front shall release them on the internet and the media. The outcome of this venture is that we can identify our true enemies. In conclusion I can only say that the Jamaatis have organized themselves over the past 30 years while we have done nothing. I urge you to join our cause. I can be reached at anti.jamaat.front@gmail.com and sanjeeb.hossain@gmail.com
Thanks,
Sanjeeb
July 18th, 2008 at 10:26 am
sushanta, please can we get a non-techie summary of nitul’s findings?
if this *is* some technical glitch (and not a govt ban) then that would be most interesting.
so far, has there been any acknowledgement from the govt that the site has been banned?
July 18th, 2008 at 11:22 am
If you look at Jamaat membership of the younger generation, you will see that it has many engineers and IT types. And this is even more true for other Islamist outfits like Hizbul Tahrir. I would not at all be surprised if some of these guys hacked and sabotaged Sachal. Something like that seems lot more likely than the regime attacking blogs because they are anti-razakar.
July 18th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
I would like to copy a comment from E-Bangladesh which reflect the summary of the post of E-BD.
///
# Sumit Awal says:
July 18th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Well As A. Nitul said, “Shachalayatan is realy working with all other ports but Shachalayatan’s 80 Port is not responding it may happened because of BTTB/BTCL management or bluehost.com” is 100% true. But, the fact is why?
I think BTTB/BTCL did nothing for any intention. Because i found nothing related so “Anti-Govt.” post in Shachalayatan so it maybe happened in mistake or bluehost got some havy traffic or packge sync and 80 Port got some problem from server (As we say this kind of problem thousand times with irc shell and saw 6667 got too many connection to stay and services down).
So it wont be so easy to say what is the real problem except bluhost & BTCL make it clear to us.
July 18th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
http://www.sachalayatan.com/sondesh/16948 contains their summary of what has happened so far.
July 18th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
[...] But majority bloggers in blogosphere are believing the first possibility, that is it has been banned. But why? Well… the most appreciating answer is after the hostile behavior of the liberation war criminals of Bangladesh with our freedom fighters, Sachalayatan has protested that incident by taking the side of the freedom fighters. And to majority of people of Bangladesh believe that the hatred razakars (iberation war criminals) have enough political powers to ban thi site. Unheard Voices has posted the whole facts in their blog. Read the full article here. [...]
July 18th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I am really shocked to see some responsible sites like E-Bangladesh highlighting some bloggers with poor techie knowledge who have been trying to create confusions around.
Getting some traceroute packets passed to a site doesn’t ensure it is accessible from your browser.
I hope people with responsibility will act in ways that don’t create confusions and chaos around Bangla Blogosphere.
July 18th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
the ear has been snatched by an eagle.
July 20th, 2008 at 2:42 am
# 19 Asif:
Good for you that you did not read the post. Unfortunately, I did and felt like biting my hand, it’s such a horrible post.
To summarize: the guy ran a tracert from his end and pings reached the Sachal server. Based on this, his conclusion: Sachal banned access to itself using their own “control panel” [.htacess?]
Utter rubbish!
# 15 Rumi:
Good point. If you take this just as a test case, then maybe we have an answer. Also, banning New Age or blogs like DP would be an absolute PR disaster for the mamus.
I don’t think a technical glitch alone will block a specific IP address and port, over such a long period of time.
Another technical point to be noted: people from BD can indeed access the site using external proxies. This means that they are bypassing an IP filter put in place in the gateway that connects the country to the backbone.
BTW, this is NOT the first time such bans took place. This has happened before, that ISPs were forced by BTTB to block access to telephony sites like Dialpad or Net2Phone, using IPCHAINS or other filters. As far as I remember, that was happening back in 99, 2000. And now they have their own gateway, a single point of control.
July 20th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
@ Tanseem (29).
Someone just hooked up this URL to me for responding your comment. I think you are enough educated/technical to understand “how a regular ban works.” Did you hear about YouTube ban in Pakistan and Thailand and thousand of other country people were not able to access that site because they were going through same network ?
Please have a look at reference in footer of this email.
Just for your information, the reason Sachalaytan is not being accessed is seems to have some problem with there or BTCL’s technical issue, not the government is banning it, If they did. They would restrict the access to entire server and just for your information, you wont able to access those through other ports like SSL etc.
However, it seems you are one of the great supporter of Sachalaytan and does not like to hear anything wheather it is truth or not. I have an update on the blog where I claim that I was wrong and now it seems the site is not blocked by government.
It is not being accessed because of some technical issue. Have a look at new post here :
http://www.nitul.net/?p=3
Reference:
http://groups.google.com/group/AGABBIP/browse_thread/thread/3f09c556cf118b33
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/25/pakistan_blocks_youtube/comments/
July 20th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Nitul: The YouTube ban you have referred to was an unusual one. Read the second link you have provided that says:
So, one should not expect that people from other countries will not be able to access a site if Bangladesh bans it.
Now on the ban we are talking about. Check my earlier comment where I say this is not a new thing and they have done it before.
BTTB/BTRC authorities have been forcing ISPs to block specific sites and specific ports for a long time.
I don’t exactly remember the year, back in 99/2000, ISPs were forced to shut off port 80 access to sites like DialPad, Net2Phone, MyFreeLD etc. Note, if at that time you used tracert to ping these servers you would have received a response.
Coming back to the present, VoIP ports including 1719, 1720, 5060 etc. remain blocked by the BTCL/BTTB gateway. Though VoIP operators usually bypass this using VPN. Again, if you ping a VoIP server, say on port 21 (FTP) or 23 (telnet), you will receive a response.
So, your conclusion that if a site is blocked, server and all ports are blocked too, does not stand, based on earlier and current banning incidents in Bangladesh.
Now, to your update in your blog. I can see you are saying, “I got some proof that make me 59% or more sure that the site is banned from BTTB.” You bring in the point that 352 other sites on the shared server can not be accessed too. In censorspeak, there is a phrase for this phenomenon: “innocent bystanders.”
I am a big fan of Sachal and an avid reader. However, that is not the issue here.
1. If your site, or DP or EBD or any other site was blocked I would have stood by the victim of censorship.
2. In a time of crisis, when the BD government is rolling out its plan on censoring the internet, it is very unfortunate that some people are propagating absurd theories. This kind of confusion campaign is deplorable and that is exactly why I commented on your post in EBD.
I hope this explains. Be well.
July 22nd, 2008 at 7:39 pm
Shabash Bangali bachhara. Technical problem bole shob cover up korar riti tao kintu notun noy, kheyal korun.
August 2nd, 2008 at 1:53 pm
So, what happened after changing the ip of the Sachalayatan hosting? Its fine in all the way.
If it was really banned by BD govt, then it must be banned again for the new ip.
As , it looks fine, we can assume that it was not banned on behalf of Bangladesh.
Am I wrong in my comments? If so, please prove it.