Mon 12 May 2008
From Rahnuma Ahmed op-ed:
“Between 1979 and 1983, Bangladesh’s military rulers sponsored migration of Bengali settlers into the Chittagong Hill Tracts. An estimated 500,000 plains settlers were provided land grants, cash and rations.”

“Things are very different now. Now you may find some Bengalis going to CHT, they are following their family members. That is not settlement. How can one stop that? It sounds nice, the only problem is that it isn’t true.”
“The army has affirmed that such incidents will not be tolerated, that peace and communal harmony must be maintained at all costs. Such affirmations ignore history. It makes nothing of tales of killings perpetrated by Bengali settlers and security forces.”
NEW AGE
May 12, 2008
Unidentified terrorists in the hills
After the Sajek incident, both high military officials in Dhaka, and those lower in the rung, in the hill tracts, have spoken of the communal harmony that exists in the hill tracts, that incidents like the Sajek arson attack threaten� A group of “external terrorists”, described by some as “unidentified terrorists”, is out to destroy peace, and development efforts, in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. The army has affirmed that such incidents will not be tolerated, that peace and communal harmony must be maintained at all costs. Such affirmations ignore history. It makes nothing of tales of killings perpetrated by Bengali settlers and security forces, writes Rahnuma Ahmed
Some external terrorists from outside Sajek have set these fires. There is no conflict between Bengalis and Paharis in this area. Those who set the fire don’t want the current communal harmony between Bengalis and Paharis to stay intact. Since they want to create a terrorist center in this area, they try to keep both sides agitated.- Major Kabir, second-in-command, Baghaihat zone(Fact Finding Team 1. Moshrefa Mishu et al, Report on 20th April Incident at Sajek Union. )
Bengali settlement in times of Emergency
BY NEARLY all accounts, Bengali settlement in the Chittagong Hill Tracts has accelerated. It has intensified. Why?
Discovering the truth is never an easy task. More so, in times of Emergency. But our rulers forget, not everyone submits. “A happy slave is the biggest threat to freedom,” says a postcard on my wall. Fortunately, the peoples of this land, neither Bengalis nor adivasis, have submitted. Never fully. Or, for long.
Five victims of Sajek “Pahari villagers” have come forward. They spoke out at a press conference in Dhaka, on April 27, 2008. Two separate fact-finding committees, consisting of writers, teachers, lawyers, student leaders and activists, human rights activists, left leaders, journalists, women’s group activists, visited the affected villages in Sajek, Rangamati. They spoke to Paharis and Bengalis. To settlers and civilians, to army personnel. They spoke to Paharis who had sought refuge in temples and forests after the arson attacks of April 20. Some still sleeping under open skies. They spoke to settler Bengalis too. To those who had taken refuge in the local market. To another settler, who had sought and found refuge in the nearby army camp itself. Those in the market were also being looked after by the army.
Binoy Chakma, a Pahari victim, had said at the press conference, nearly ninety per cent of the villagers of Purbo Para, Gongaram Mukh, Retkaba, Baibacchora, the four Pahari villages that were burnt down, originally belonged to Longodu, Borkol, and Dighinala. But we were forced to leave our homes, said Binoy, because of army and settler attacks. Life in Baghaicchori, under Sajek union, was not easy. Army presence was continuous. It was stifling. But we managed. We managed to lead peaceful lives, to eke out modest livings. Things changed, however, with the declaration of Emergency, said Binoy. Warrant Officer Haroon told us, army posts will be built here. But later, small huts were built instead, in our land and garden. The settlers built them, the army helped them. We had set aside land for building a Buddhist temple, they took that away too. We protested, but they threatened us. Indra Chakma’s pineapple garden in Retkaba was destroyed. Ali, a settler, forcibly built a house on Indra’s land. Indra resisted, Ali and the soldiers dragged him to the army camp. If you protest again, they said, we’ll slaughter you like a sacrificial cow. There were other injustices, too. Rat infestation had left us with little food, the UNDP gave rice for 1,500 families. It was the UP Chairman L Thangar’s duty to distribute 20 kilograms for each family. But he gave only 8-10 kilograms to each Pahari family. When we asked him, he said, he had army instructions.
One of the fact-finding committee’s reports corroborates Binoy’s account, “since 11 January 2007, the process of Bengali settlers grabbing Pahari land has accelerated.” It also says land grabbing and Pahari eviction is taking place under army supervision. A weekly review of the Asian Centre for Human Rights (April 23, 2008) reports similar trends, “Since the imposition of the State of Emergency, the implantation of illegal plain settlers has intensified with the direct involvement of Bangladesh army.”
Between 1979 and 1983, Bangladesh’s military rulers sponsored migration of Bengali settlers into the Chittagong Hill Tracts. An estimated 500,000 plains settlers were provided land grants, cash and rations. As is clear from the Chittagong Hill Tracts Commission report, Life is not ours (1991), the programme of turning Paharis into a minority was not made public then. Government representatives had repeatedly denied the existence of such a plan.
What does one hear now? Bengali settlement in the CHT is a thing of the past. The 1980s, yes, that was the settlement era. It was a mistake. The military rulers failed to realise it was a political problem, it should not be dealt with by force. Things are very different now. Now you may find some Bengalis going to CHT, they are following their family members. That is not settlement. How can one stop that? It sounds nice, the only problem is that it isn’t true. Settlement is still active. It seems to be at a final stage. Ina Hume, a daughter of the hills, and a careful observer of military repression wrote in 2005, a new road has been built from Baghaihat to Sajek. It borders the Mizoram hills of northeast India. She adds, there have been reports that the Bangladesh Army is involved in settling a further 10,000 Bengali families in the Kassalong Reserve Forest in Sajek. The writers of Life is not ours had noted, Pakistan, and later, the Bangladesh government had been uneasy about the borders with India and Burma being inhabited by a majority of the hill peoples. The Sajek incident, it seems, was destined to occur.
Need I say that the proposed settlement of Bengali families in the Kassalong Reserve Forest is in direct negation of the 1997 Peace Accord? Or, that the construction of the Baghaihat-Sajek road by the Bangladesh Army Engineer Construction Battalion, in the Kassalong Reserve Forest, clearly violates the Forest Act of 1927, and the Bangladesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 2000?
Four stakes vs Pahari homes
Most media reports in the Bangladesh press have stressed that losses occurred on both sides. Most reports mentioned that a larger number of Bengali homes were razed to the ground.
The fact-finding committee reports have been invaluable in providing a truer account of what happened. The report of the fact-finding committee led by Sara Hossain contains vivid descriptions of what Paharis lost as a result of the attacks. A middle-aged Chakma villager of Balurghat Para had told the committee members, “Our rice, clothes, pots-pans-plates have all been burnt. School books, birth registration certificates, SSC certificates, they’re all totally burnt.” Several eyewitnesses and victims had said that their valuables were looted first, the houses set on fire later. A Daney Bhaibachora villager who had been interviewed had said, “The people who were setting things alight, they first took out from our homes, the TVs, beds, wardrobes, whatever they found, they looted, and at the end they torched the houses. Those who set the houses alight. They took everything.” A Chakma woman had added, “I’ve heard that a TV was found in the Bangali Para. The Army has said that they will return the TV.”
The other committee report, the one led by Moshrefa Mishu, is also invaluable. It fleshes out what the Bengalis settlers lost. According to the writers, Bengali settler houses are temporary shelters. They consist of four stakes (khuti) pegged to the ground. There are hundreds of such homes in the Dui Tila area. They write, we spoke to Bengali inhabitants, who told us that they live here for short periods only. The report says, land grants to Bengali families are parcelled into smaller pieces meant for habitation, close to army camps, and larger pieces, located in far-away places. The report states, “…most Bengalis have two houses… Dighinala and Lichu Bagan are 12 kilometres apart…We interviewed settlers who told us that they had received 4 acres and 1/70th land in Lichubagan, and the remaining 1/30th land on Betcchari.” The writers go on, it was the same in Dui Tila and Chongracchori. Settlers told us, they had 1/30th of an acre here, the rest, 4 acres and 1/70th land in distant mountainous areas.
Communal harmony: a myth in the making?
After the Sajek incident, both high military officials in Dhaka, and those lower in the rung, in the Hill Tracts, like the Major quoted above, have spoken of the communal harmony that exists in the Hill Tracts, that incidents like the Sajek arson attack threaten. These will not be tolerated, we have been told. A group of “external terrorists,” described by some as “unidentified terrorists,” is out to destroy peace and development efforts in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. The army has affirmed that such incidents will not be tolerated, that peace and communal harmony must be maintained at all costs.
Such affirmations ignore history. It makes nothing of tales of killings perpetrated by Bengali settlers and security forces. To mention some: Logang cluster village massacre, Khagracchori 10 April 1992. Naniarchar Bazar massacre, Rangamati, 17 November 1993. Malya massacre, Langadu upazilla, 1992. It ignores instances of communal riots such as the Bhuacchari incident, April-May 2003.
Other Sajeks will occur, I guess, if we do not face up to the truth. Even in times of emergency.
For full set of documents on Sajek: Go Here

May 12th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
One of the best and realistic pieces i have read on CHT. Thank you Rahnuma.
May 13th, 2008 at 3:25 am
As Rahnuma points out, ‘discovering the truth is never an easy task. More so, in times of Emergency’. One could add ’speaking out the truth is never an easy task. More so, in times of Emergency’ – so Kuddos to Rahnuma for writing it and to the New Age for publishing this timely oped today under the title ‘Unidentified terrorists in the hills’.
Now will this octopus of an unchallenged govt manage to bring its tentacle perpetrators of arson, rape and loot in Sajek to book? Show it cares for its people by upholding a long-awaited justice?
The article makes for chilling read and I recommend everyone here to ‘face up to the truth’ of the predicament of the CHT people. Otherwise, as Rahnuma concludes ‘other Sajeks will occur’..
May 13th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
you make the settlers sound like jews occupying palestine.
May 13th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
# 3 fugstar
probably worse
Farhad
May 13th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
#3 Fugstar
Would be intrigued to hear your explanation of how the “settlers” (and the policy behind them) are any different / better
May 14th, 2008 at 3:29 am
Fugstar
The comparison between Bengali settlers in CHT, and Jewish settlers in Palestine, is not a new one.
See this op-ed in DS
http://www.thedailystar.net/2007/07/10/d707101502126.htm
My own little Palestine
Shambhu Rahmat
Imagine a country where troubles started with British masters. Drawing lines, separating people, making countries. Some gained freedom, others became prisoners.
After World War II, the exhausted Empire in retreat — new post-colonial nations are created. For geo-political reasons, borders are drawn and people find themselves in another country. The original inhabitants of that land now become a problem. They have no documents proving legal ownership of the land they lived in for generations. Slowly they start to see settlers — new arrivals subsidised by an invisible, far-away state. Ironically the settlers belong to a people who have been historically oppressed, and have just emerged from a genocide. But they fail to see the contradiction in their own action.
Soon, very soon, the original inhabitants find themselves becoming a numeric minority. More settlers take over land and build settlements. Large construction projects also arrive, displacing entire villages. The gentle days are over.
The inevitable happens. The indigenous people lose their so-called gentleness. A charismatic leader rises and unites the disparate groups — groups that formerly had no cohesion, structure, or politics. An armed guerilla group is born, the stated intention is to defend rights and win freedom.
For a time, the world is enamored of the figure of the romantic guerilla. But soon, other headlines dominate and they move on. Neighbouring states also support the movement for a time. Less out of solidarity, more out of a desire to make trouble for their enemy. Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish said in a Godard film: “The world is only interested in us because of who our opponents are.”
Eventually the neighbouring states stop supporting the guerillas. The settlers are also increasingly well-protected. Lighting terrorist strikes that cause damage become difficult. Exhausted and under-funded, the guerilla movement drops the demand for full independence. Now they want autonomy, some even say partial autonomy would be acceptable.
The charismatic guerilla leader comes out of hiding. To everyone’s surprise he finally recognises the right to co-existence. Some praise his maturing political approach, others remain suspicious. After top-secret talks, a historic peace treaty is signed.
Some observers are jubilant: an end to the fighting? But among the guerilla movement’s own ranks, there are cries of betrayal. The movement splinters into two. The more radical group rejects the treaty, and vows to continue fighting.
The second inevitable happens. Now the two factions start fighting each other. Brother against cousin against friend. Fratricide is the order of the day, the movement for independence and rights is long forgotten.
The indigenous people are at a twilight crossroad. Independence is a shattered dream, many are so exhausted they want peace at any cost. Their children scatter all over the world — Australia, England, America, any place that will give a visa. A new diaspora is created. The next generation is exhausted. “Give us freedom” becomes “Just give me a job and some dignity.”
The once proud guerilla movement is corroded to the point of random kidnapping of foreigners. No faction claims credit, thus every person is a suspect. Even those who have assimilated and taken mainstream jobs are not protected. It all depends on the way you look, the colour of your skin, the shape of your eyes, your last name.
Everything I wrote, it happened, more or less. Not far away in the Middle East, but very close to our own homes. Our hearts bleed for Palestine, but when will they bleed for our own people? This is an elegy for the Chittagong Hill Tracts.
May 14th, 2008 at 5:07 am
The blue banner in the picture should say “withdraw military and cage them”. I am tired of hearing “unidentified terrorists” (or “kotipoy druskritikari”). Everyone knows these are blatant lies, but just takes it. Almost all political Bangladeshi, I know, have hated US military for ‘My Lai massacre’, but I have seen very few of them given any more than a fleeting gesture at what goes in CHT. I guess CHT is leased to impotent army to make them feel important. This slow motion ethnic cleansing should stop right NOW.
May 14th, 2008 at 9:41 am
# 7 SC
“unidentified terrorists” is a term our Pakistani brothers/masters loved to use when referring to the Muktis. Ironic, that on a reverse role we are oblivious to the similarities. The only difference being that instead of a sudden horrific genocide because of the stupidity of the army generals at that time there is now a slow and painful obliteration of a people carried out by the Bengalis.
Farhad
May 14th, 2008 at 11:24 am
It doesn’t surprise me that the wrong comparison between poor bengali muslims and jewish occupiers has been made. Its a disgusting comparison but i guess i understand why your brains think like that. Do understand that i believe little of what i read on the matter (for many reasons) and will find out things more directly in future.
I am not particularly anti-pahari, no more than i am anti bangali or anti bihari. In fact my solution has always been to marry the shanti bahini leader’s daughter and usher in great relations.
These settlers didn’t have the option of international migration that others have taken, no such riches or opportunities. They are not european, or urbanised. Many of them are landless and come from communities disintegrated by river erosion, right? So i feel that all the dynamic forces in the equation need to be accounted for. Maybe the buriganga needs to flop around and take out dhaka for people to understand the difference. There is no need to assume white mans guilt.
Where do you propose to put the hundreds of thousands of environmental refugees of bangladesh in future? Will you be the ansar do you even believe in that concept any longer or is mean minded racial nationalism our ‘End of History’?
The jews could have gone pretty much anywhere, or stayed where they stood, but the zionizers were intent on conducting a post WW2 colonisation initiative. It is disgusting that bengalis think of themselves as worse than jewish settlers, but to be honest nothing surprises me anymore. It brings a new meaning to the term ’self hating jew’, coined by zionists to silence jewish critics of the ilegitimate state. Our displaced settlers couldn’t stay where they stood.
We are fenced in and shot at at the borders by the ever friendly and respectful neighbour of ours. There is land in CHT, only its not ‘politically correct’ (in a white boy sense) to see the CHT as an opportunity to be taken with care.
Maybe we should have gotten ourselves murshidabad (heritage) instead of CHT (HEP, lebensraum and potential minerals) back in the time of the radcliffe commission.
Its sad that the relationship isnt warm and cooperative between the groups. Am i wrong to think that bangladesh is a country capable of pluralism and purposeful internal cooperation? What’s sadder is when people frame the issue so incompletely and latch onto alien words like ‘ethnic cleansing’.
May 14th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
It would be good get the history of the CHT before we try to portray this as a fight between two sections of have nots.
http://www.acharya03.org/cht.ppt
if you do not have powerpoint, the text is below. The timeliens were prepared by Govind Acharya of Amnesty in 2004.
This is the html version of the file http://www.acharya03.org/cht.ppt.
G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:Czz4qvNQYXAJ:www.acharya03.org/cht.ppt+Govind+acharya+CHT&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1
Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: govind acharya cht
Chittagong Hill Tracts
History of Oppression
By Govind Acharya, Amnesty International USA Bangladesh Country Specialist,
Four Broad Groups of People
The Kuki people were the ones who were in the area in prehistoric times.
In the early written language years, the Tripura peoples arrived from the west.
The Arakan came from present-day Burma.
Finally, the Chakmas and the Marmas arrived, making them the last non-Bengalis to settle in the region.
The Clash With the British
The Battle of Plassey in 1757 brought all of Bengal, including the tribal regions, under the suzerainty of the British East India Company.
After some fighting with the British, the Chakma raja settled with the Company, agreeing to pay a yearly tribute in exchange for autonomy.
In 1860, the British government created the Chittagong Hill Tracts
In 1900, the British promulgated an order to guarantee that only CHT tribals could own land in the CHT.
Indian Independence
The Boundary Commission tasked with partitioning India and Pakistan opted to include the CHT in Pakistan, despite the protests of some segments of the community.
Pakistani rule saw the beginning of the end of the autonomy that the CHT communities had since 1860. Small-scale violence began soon after Pakistan’s independence.
The Pakistani government constructed several hydroelectric dams, causing ecological damage to a swathe of the CHT region.
Pakistan withdrew the autonomy of the region under the military regime of Gen. Ayub Khan in 1963. Migration of non-Tribals began around this time frame.
The Liberation of Bangladesh in 1971
The CHT was perceived as indifferent to the plight of the Bengalis and their freedom struggle. Some accused the CHT tribals of siding with Pakistan.
After independence, the Mukti Bahini was implicated in human rights violations committed against the tribals in the region, presumably in revenge for their neutrality in the 1971 war.
Soon after independence, M.N. Larma, a tribal leader, formed the political movement, the Jana Samhati Samiti (JSS), which created the military wing, called the Shanti Bahini.
The Human Rights Violations Begin in Earnest
The provocation by the JSS in forming a military wing, brought horrific reprisals by the new government.
The government’s security forces often joined with Bengali settler militia, participating in massacres that left hundreds dead.
This was coupled with a large-scale influx of Bengali migrants seeking to start a new life with land in a fertile growing region.
In March 1980, in response to an attack by the Shanti Bahini, Bangladesh security forces lined up dozens of tribals and shot them, outside of Rangamati.
The Influx
President Zia, who emerged from the chaotic 1975 – 1979 coup d’états, instituted a system of incentives to encourage Bengalis to move to the CHT.
This occurred rapidly, culminating in nearly 1/3 of the population of the CHT being of Bengali origin.
In addition to the ethnic dimension, most of the Bengali settlers are Muslim, while the tribal groups are mostly Buddhist, with a few Hindus.
Islamic missionaries have been active in the region, provoking religious tensions between converts and those who remained with Buddhism.
More Human Rights Violations in the 80’s
During the rule of Gen. Ershad, the insurgency peaked, despite several attempts to split the JSS to isolate them.
Village Defense Parties (VDP) formed by security forces to defend Bengali property and lives killed up to 2,500 tribals in the early 1980s.
On April 19, 1986, a group of refugees fleeing to India were intercepted by the 31st Battalion of the BDR close to the Indian border post. Despite attempts of the Indian border guards to intervene, the 200 individuals were rounded up, many of whom were summarily executed and all were dumped into a mass grave.
In response to a letter by the Bangladesh government to Amnesty International around this time, AI asked that they cite a specific case where a perpetrator was punished– no response was received.
Refugees and the Border
At the height of the conflict at the end of 1986 and 1987, India reported that 40,000 people had crossed into India and were refugees.
Bangladesh hinted that the Shanti Bahini was being armed and funded by their brethren in India. Indeed, many thousands of the same tribal groups do live in Tripura and no doubt provided material support to the JSS.
The CHT residents were mainly involved in agriculture and as refugees, were left depending on handouts from the Government of India.
The Violations Committed By the Shanti Bahini
The Shanti Bahini (aka the Peace Army) committed widespread human rights violations by murdering settlers and killing soldiers that surrendered.
There is evidence that tribals involved in negotiating with the government were killed by the armed wing of the JSS.
In April 1989, 13 non-tribals were massacred in Kaptai subdistrict.
Rape As a Weapon
On December 26, 1986, a group of non-tribal men raped and mutilated a group of women after Bangladeshi security forces burnt down their village in Baghai-Chari.
In Panchari sub-district, several women were raped by non-tribals and security forces and two tribal men were killed.
Horror and Hope
On April 10, 1992, over 100 tribals were killed in revenge for the alleged killing of a non-tribal boy by the Shanti Bahini. The BDR arrived on the scene, but failed to arrest anyone for the crime.
A unilateral cease-fire was ordered by the Shanti Bahini in response to Prime Minister Khaleda Zia’s peace talks offer in 1992.
Peace talks were somewhat successful, but the Bangladeshi government failed to issue a guarantee of safety to refugees. The refugees, now 50,000 strong refused to return from India until such guarantees were made.
Special Powers Act and the CHT
The new democratically elected government began to use the Special Powers Act (SPA) arbitrarily against the Chakma people in the CHT.
Sanjoy Chakma was arrested on March 16, 1993 and was held for speaking out on behalf of CHT rights.
By the end of 1993, hundreds of tribals were held under SPA. Several were extrajudicially executed.
Prelude to Peace?
The mid-90s saw a period of relative calm in the CHT region, with periodic cease-fires. These cease-fires were often punctuated by violent episodes.
Negotiations centered around the repatriation of refugees from India as well as the level of autonomy for the region.
Waiyzo Marma, a Buddhist monk, his wife and a guest were beaten in this time for denying having sheltered a Shanti Bahini soldier.
Kalpana Chakma, a women’s rights activist, disappeared without a trace. AI has reason to believe she was arrested by the security forces. To this day, her whereabouts are unknown.
The Peace Treaty– the positives
In exchange for autonomy and an amnesty, the Shanti Bahini surrendered their weapons and were brought into the political mainstream.
The estimated 64,000 refugees from Tripura came home.
The formation of a 22 seat council to be composed of the various tribes.
A commission will look into the property disputes that are at the core of the tensions in the area.
There will be an eventual withdrawal of the Bangladesh Army.
Problems With the Treaty
Lack of some enabling legislation from the Jatiya Sangsad has left the treaty is a bit in limbo.
There is no provision for prosecuting people who committed human rights violations.
There seems to be a lack of buy-in by some vested interests– specifically the settler community, who believes that their needs were not met by this treaty. This has led to violence, post-treaty.
Violations of Human Rights, post-treaty
At Babu Chara Bazar, a women who was molested by a member of the security forces yelled for help. When help arrived, security forces came with 150 men and started beating up the people who helped the woman, leaving three people dead.
The Benuban Buddist Temple was ransacked by settlers in a dispute.
In a recent incident where a group of settlers attacked tribals, nine women were raped, a man was killed in front of his family and a 9-month old baby was strangled to death at Mahalchari. This was in response to a settler who was kidnapped. The residents of the town were not permitted to file a FIR until a court ordered the police to accept it. This incident is currently a subject of a worldwide Amnesty International campaign.
May 14th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
“It brings a new meaning to the term ’self hating jew’, coined by zionists to silence jewish critics of the ilegitimate state”
So, wait, you’re using your Zionist adversary’s tactic of labelling opposition “self-hating” while decrying Zionism?
“What’s sadder is when people frame the issue so incompletely and latch onto alien words like ‘ethnic cleansing’.”
What’s REALLY sad is when people frame the issue so incompletely and actually ENGAGE in alien actions such as ethnic cleansing. Leave it to our resident getting-it-wrong-like-a-neo-con commentator here to decry people using alien words and not actions.
Deliciously fuggish. Reminds me once again as to why I stopped responding to you on my blog months ago.
May 14th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
a pleasure to have left a scar on you DS. murderers and rapists dont read blogs like this, HRwallahs do. hence the shape of #9.
I’m just doubting whether seeing our bangladeshi selves as occupiers is an appropriate way of going about this.
Gotta love AI’s narrative, so engendering of trust and sobriety!
‘Non-tribals’
‘Insurgency’
‘Islamic missionaries’
‘Rape as a weapon’
I don’t think that these ‘nontribal’ people are ‘haves’ though you dont seem to regard them as ‘havenots’. One of the worst things i can imagine is not having an address, many of them (I do not know what proportion) had lost their address. The state has behaved like a git, but where to human rights addicts get off demonising? and labelling those who have other views as ‘deniers’. The actions are wrong, not alien, the words are alien.
Also there’s some history missing, of continuity of leadership amongst ‘tribals’. What was the impact of raja tridev roy’s abdication?
May 14th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
I usually struggle to comprehend how something like Sajek can occur, because I know how there are so many incredible Bangladeshis who are working tirelessly for universal human rights and equality in their country and it seems to me when I see these people that Bangladeshis are incapable of this kind of behaviour and the attitudes that tolerate, condone and encourage it.
But then I read comments by the Fugstars of the world, such as
“my solution has always been to marry the shanti bahini leader’s daughter and usher in great relations” (#9)
and I am reminded of why Sajek can keep happening. Not to mention the rape of Bengali women in 1971 as part of the “solution”. Not to mention … etc etc etc
May 14th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
…udayan, yes, this is where we conclude that multiculturalism and the british education system has gone wrong somewhere big time to produce gems like this one.
May 14th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
For a second, I read Fugstar’s comment and was outraged…and then I remembered that it came from Fugstar.
You know, DS, I kept wanting to stop responding to Fugstar too. Heck, if I were bulimic, I would just come and read his posts instead of sticking my fingers down my throat.
Had the settlers been have-nots and non-Muslims, I doubt that Fugstar would have thrown in his two cents/pence in their support.
Apparently, it’s ok to grab someone else’s land if you’re a have-not. Huh? Is the raping and looting collateral damage or something? I’d have liked to see the repercussions of this if the settlers had setlled on the land of their fellow Bengalis.
May 15th, 2008 at 12:01 am
Fugstar,
If you don’t believe anything you read here as you said, why do you hang out in this blog? Why not keep updating yours? Oh, I eagerly await the result your own personal investigation (9). When exactly you are planning on doing it? After all the evidences are destroyed? Please do enlighten us. Its not enough to find faults at the ‘HRwallahs’ until you come up with something alternative. or is this a sick way to get attention to yourself?
May 15th, 2008 at 12:31 am
fugstar is someone whom we should derive humour from, rather than be offended by his conflicted, morally-relativist ideas, which at the end of the day, amount to nothing. fugstar is not an individual, he is representative of a social malaise known as ‘Multiculturalism’.
Like thousands of young Muslim Asians born and brought up in the UK (or rather, Bangladeshis specifically, since other Asians seem to have fared much better), he is the product of 40 years of the most flaccid and deletrious social engineering known as British Multiculturalism. These are the policies devised by upper-middle class post-war British elites, which over the last 30 yearss, has allowed entire communities take the form of tribalistic, village ghettos. These communities are nothing more than cultural bubble which reinforce ideas and values that have long gone out of date in Bangladesh, let alone the UK. Within these bubbles, immigrants are free to carry on re-enacting the same male-dominated, insular, regressive gender patterns that they came over here with three or four generations ago.
What’s worse, they have been given special concessions from government institions in the UK to reinforce these “multicultural” values.
We now have great numbers of very well educated but confused and conflicted duffers who make pronoucements like the ones made by fugstar, who is a classic example. He’s so innured in post-modern moral-relativism, he can’t even understand the contradictions he has steeped himself in.
Hence it is ok to hate Zionism (read Israel, but really Jews specifically) but use the Zionist slur of “self-hating Jew” on Bangladeshis who protest the crimes by Muslims on non-Muslims in CHT. This is a piece of irony many comedians get paid to come up with.
Multiculturalism has tolerated, even encouraged these communities to hate western values and support reactionary Islamist extremists in Bangladesh while benefiting from all the comforts, facilities, state benefits and opportunities that are given freely by the British government.
Multiculturalism has allowed them to fight the creation of liberal democracies “back home” while benefitting from living in them here in the West.
Multiculturalism has allowed them to fund the attacks on the Ahmadiyya while flourishing as a religious minority in the West.
Multiculturalism has allowed them to fly in regressive clerical fascists such as Delwar Hussain Sayeedi, on UK tax-payers money to preach in British Mosques, where he will rant about the destruction of the kuffar West and it’s values.
Fugstar, next time you call someone a self-hating Bangladeshi for protesting against ethnic cleansing in CHT, bear in mind that that makes you a Zionist. Although, I fully expect that the irony is completely lost on you.
May 15th, 2008 at 3:05 am
Regarding Fugstar’s comments, I suggest we either respond to the comments or ignore them, but there is no reason to attack someone personally. Nor, I feel, is there a need to bring up someone’s background, real or imaginary, to set the stage for denouncing that person.
May 15th, 2008 at 5:43 am
I dont have much knowledge of the history behind CHT. But what I dont get is that why would it be wrong for Bengali speaking people to settle in Hill tracts areas?
Obviously burning down homes etc. are criminal offences, but could someone explain in layman’s terms, why would one group of Bangladeshis not be allowed to settle in any part of Bangladesh ?
May 15th, 2008 at 10:44 am
The ‘those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones’ type ethic isn’t mine I’m afraid. Why cant you interpret it as a message thrown through the open window of your own glass house, saying ‘look at the origins of these settlers’.
The CHT narrative, very ably demonstrated by the AI article misses chunks and attracts strange politicised allies. My use of that sentence ‘i don’t believe’ was as one reason for viewing the situation differently to what you present. another is that people who would know have told me that there were displacees amongst the people you call settlers.
The jewish settler comparison is faulty. It doesn’t help the issue, unless its solely ‘attention’ that is sought…. My concerns are not ‘illegitimate and irrelavent’ to the dignity of bangladeshis. Nor are they original, they exist around you but you don’t want to listen.
May 15th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Fugstar,
Here is another example of you even contradicting your own thinking. I seriously doubt how much thought actually goes into putting these comments in as you seem to have forgotten what you have written only yesterday. Your ‘I don’t believe’ was not in the context of the AI article but rather then fact finding stories published in this blog.
Quote from from your comment in #9 (before I put the AI timeline)
” Do understand that i believe little of what i read on the matter (for many reasons) and will find out things more directly in future.”
May 15th, 2008 at 11:43 am
Racism exists too, but I’m not going to go around encouraging people to fill my ears with it.
It is understandable to most here that the looting, the raping and the condoning of such behaviour that is implied by going over the settlers’ origins/economic background, comparions with Jews, and other secondary concerns are objectionable. If the army wishes to help deprived Bengalis find somewhere to live, surely there are places other than on top of the intentionally ruined homes of the indigenous.
I just remembered once being told that it is pointless to argue with someone who has a few screws loose. I guess that means I’ll stop now.
May 15th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
(19) Musa,
There is nothing wrong with a Bangali settling in CHT. But in this case, 400,000 people were migrated in CHT under direct state patronage depriving the locals. Their lands were taken by force under the direct patronage of various governments starting in 1979. The militarization of the area began then and there have been regular reports of rights abuse since then often targetted towards to the jumma people. Please read the piece by Rahnuma above if you haven’t.
May 15th, 2008 at 12:40 pm
sigh,
” Do understand that i believe little of what i read on the matter (for many reasons) and will find out things more directly in future.”
The HR narrative of CHT is ably demonstrated by the AI cut and paste. that it was posted later is independant of my default prejudice, yet its content also confirms it.
I beleive little of what i read on the matter *because* of that kind of narrative, which i have come across before.
Clear? also i think many people got my new layer of understanding of the self hating jew quite wrong. that I will blame on cultural translation.
#22 middle para. agreed.
May 15th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
# 17 Sid.
Good analysis on the dilemma faced by the current ‘multi-cultural’ Britain. Don’t know Fugstar and will refrain from commenting on him.
May 15th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Economic migration = people moving to fulfil an unmet need
That is why many rural Bangladeshis move to Dhaka, Chittagong, and inded Fugstar to that neighbour you refer to so subtly, which though grudgingly, accommodates thousands of such economic migrants every year
Economic migration does NOT require burning villages, places of worship, murder, rape, torture and the like.
If it was a simple case of economic migration, there wouldn’t be a need for continual military presence in the area.
Which part of this scenario do you find difficult to understand?
May 15th, 2008 at 2:11 pm
#17. Ouch.
Although in fairness, Sid, blame must be laid at the right feet. “These are the policies devised by upper-middle class post-war British elites.” Yes, but you forgot to mention which set of elites.
Primarily the liberal elites, the champagne-socialist Guardian-reading classes of Hampstead and Islington who wouldn’t recognize a reactionary fascist threat in their midst unless a bomb went off under their asses - and sometimes not even then. The same bunch of airy-fairy heads-in-the-clouds who’d happily spend millions in taxes on “translation services” for dysfunctional immigrants who’ve been here 30 years and don’t know a syllable of English (all to appease the god of “multiculturalism”) rather than insist that everyone get on board with the programme and learn the local language at the very least as a forward step to integration.
The liberal middle classes, as has been pointed out elsewhere, are animated by nothing so much as their disdain (if not hatred) of the white working class. Keeping the peasant immigrants in their ghettoes served at least two purposes -
1) screw the local working class with the cheap imported labour as direct competition, and
2) at the same time, keep middle-class status permanently out of reach of the new immigrants. You don’t want immigrant spawn desecrating the hallowed ground of NW if they can be confined to the wretchedness of E1 instead.
Enoch was right, or as close to as possible. Fug and his like is what you get.
May 15th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Some comments on a number of execrable fuggisms:
i think many people got my new layer of understanding of the self hating jew quite wrong. that I will blame on cultural translation.
Yes, why blame your own inability to express a cogent idea when you can blame “cultural translation”. Spare a thought to your victims who read your tripe.
The jewish settler comparison is faulty. It doesn’t help the issue, unless its solely ‘attention’ that is sought….
Quite right, because for all their crimes, I am yet to hear of Jewish settlers resorting to raping Palestinian girls or looting from their men, or going on wholesale rampages oft their homesteads. But why you think its “faulty” is probably because you loathe Muslims being compared to Jews. But land grab is land grab. What comparison would you prefer?
another is that people who would know have told me that there were displacees amongst the people you call settlers.
Don’t be coy. Tell us about these people “who would know”. Present a factual argument instead of hiding behind fluffy anecdotes and arbitrary opinions.
My concerns are not ‘illegitimate and irrelavent’ to the dignity of bangladeshis.
It is obvious that your definition of bangladeshis does not cover tribal people who are having their land forcibly removed from them. Their loss of dignity is immaterial to you, I would imagine.
Am i wrong to think that bangladesh is a country capable of pluralism and purposeful internal cooperation?
This is a question you should be directing at the people who are attacking the Paharis in CHT. And the answer is: Not if you and your brutish majoritorian Islamists have your way.
May 15th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
# 27 Stratford
like your dig at the liberal elites
Farhad
May 15th, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Latest from Sajek: merchandise seized
The settlers in Sajek appear to have put an economic embargo on Jumma populated areas, with merchandise for village shops of two Jummas seized at Baghaihat bazaar. Sources said, on 11 May, two elderly Jummas in their sixties, Leipeda Chakma and Gyana Ranjan Chakma, were ferrying goods from Karengatoli bazaar to their shops at Gangaram Mukh. When they reached Baghaihat, a settler named Nazimuddin seized the goods, apparently on orders of the army officers. As the Jummas protested at the illegal seizure, Nazimuddin asked them to contact the zone commander, Lt. Col. Sajid Imtiaz, the mastermind behind the 20 April attack on 4 Jumma villages in Sajek.
Attempt at capture or effacement of evidence? Since 10 May, settlers have been cleaning the ashes and charred beams of the burned houses of the Jummas. “They are doing it on orders of the army and it is not clear if it is an attempt to capture our land or to efface the telltale mark of the brutal attack or a purely generous help” said one villager, who spoke to chtnews.com from Sajek on special arrangement.
May 15th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Sid ‘Vicious’,
I’m not sure how the british policy wonk term of multiculturalism has shaped my views on the world, but amused that it causes you grief. I’m pretty sure it hasnt.
You attribute too much to multiculturalism, clearly something you have complex issues with. However fundamentally, its your own views which are more buffeted by trends, policy directives, ethnic guilt tripping and headlines.
Lets assume a definition of a deshi as anyone on the land. The pahari suffering is already voiced here, im augmenting. You neednt make the repeated mistake of assuming my support for dumb or wrongful action, even though it might make you sound big, savvy and dramatic to yourself.
My sources:
People who have suffered erosion of their lands in the south east, and in the north, people who work in outfits like the Adarsho Gram Project, people who have worked in the CHT area. The *real* medium of people, not the press. Im not a name dropper like you are, but im fairly sure it is not a complete fabrication.
Udayan,
It is not *just* economic migration that is going on, it is a historical environmental displacement of people who often know only farming, and this will probably grow.
What I dont understand about this scenario is how to resolve both the local conflicts mentioned and the changing internal displacee scenario. I thought my Emperor Akbar approach, had some promise, but this chimes with 71 raping to you, and im not sure why.
For more (if you can bear it of course),
http://fugstar.blogspot.com/2008/03/less-living-room-for-bangladeshis.html
May 15th, 2008 at 4:57 pm
[...] Islam & colleagues, taken during Fact Finding Team’s attempted visit to Sajek. CHT: Denying History CHT: Life is Not Ours [Buddhi Ranjan Chakma Begging For Help] [Bagerhat: Burnt Pahari Homes] [...]
May 15th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
fugstar:
You attribute too much to multiculturalism, clearly something you have complex issues with. However fundamentally, its your own views which are more buffeted by trends, policy directives, ethnic guilt tripping and headlines.
Don’t make the mistake of thinking that I am either or any of the following:
a) A multiculturalised BanglaTown ghetto-monkey who would be deluded by your unintelligible nonsense simply because it sounds like you got past your GCSEs.
b) Some hapless white social worker who’s terms of employment forces him to agree with you in seeing racism and “white post-imperialist” prejudice when there is none. You and your kind have managed to use that excuse for years to get what you want. Time for wallowing in victimhood is over.
You neednt make the repeated mistake of assuming my support for dumb or wrongful action, even though it might make you sound big, savvy and dramatic to yourself.
Is that an attempt at backtracking your support of the CHT attacks of Paharis? If so, it’s pitiful. I don’t have to create your “support for dumb or wrongful action” since you have done a splendid job of it yourself on this thread. A cursory look at the number of commenters, besides myself, who have been repulsed by your comments should make it clear where your support lies. Assumptions are not necessary. So please refrain from implying that you’ve been misunderstood.
May 15th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
We will keep the debate focused on CHT and nothing else. Please refrain from getting distracted.
May 15th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
More reading here;
Forced eviction, atrocities during the conflict between the government and the rebels, confiscation of land to establish military camps, population transfer programme, clashes between Bengali settlers and minority ethnic groups have also compelled many hill people to flee their homesteads.
http://www.newagebd.com/2008/feb/14/front.html#4
May 15th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
The issue is complex, historical, and nationally challenging, as it involves migration, border security, regional population, LDC economy, and hilly terrain.
It is IMPORTANT that no sides are taken (anti-army, anti-govt, anti-India etc), by ALL concerned, in order to make NEUTRAL, balanced and understanding solutions.
Here is one report made in 2002, including recommendations for solutions:
http://www.acdis.uiuc.edu/Research/OPs/Chowdhury/ChowdhuryOP.pdf
May 17th, 2008 at 10:39 am
I know I’m supposed to keep the debate focussed on CHT, but this is the first time I’ve checked this thread in a while, so I hope the moderators let this one slip.
Apparently laughter is a “scar” nowadays. Help, Dave Chappelle just scarred me! Albeit deliberately.
Tacit, I’d love to refrain from personal attacks if semi-personal attacks like “self-hating” Bangalis were not bandied about so easily. As it is, I was laughing at his own Zionist tactics while decrying Zionism. And remember, tactics matter to ol’ fug: he keeps decrying those who are labelling this “ethnic cleansing”, (as if calling this some nice Persian-Turkic-Arabic term would solve all of CHTs problems overnight.)
Asif bhai, thanks for showing once again that s/he-of-the-unfortunate-monicker is nothing except a troll. He comes here only to irritate anyone with a different POV. If he wanted to really engage, he’d take the trouble of going to CHT and writing something on his own. Apologies for taking this off track.
So, “old friend”, thanks for the vote of confidence. See, what I’ve decided is better than self-induced vomiting (blogimia?): I’ve decided that since Fugstar’s responses are usually so ridiculous, the only appropriate response to them is to quote some random line from either Seinfeld or Curb Your Enthusiasm in response to his. Jewish comedians, just to piss him off a bit more.
Back to CHT, and apologies once again.
May 18th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Over at PP, fugstar has been given the nickname Osama Ben Elton. For non-British readers, Ben Elton is a hilarious (Jewish) comedian. Although I think Fugstar’s funniest lines are unintentional.