Thu 1 May 2008



After a lot of fumbling, failures and reform buzzwords, it seems that the government has come up with its own exit strategy. No, it has nothing to do with continuing reform or fixing our institutes. Its simply about their collective backside getting protected by ensuring their hold in the power for the long term.
Based on judging last few month’s of events and recently reports, the exit strategy now centers around Dhaner Sheesh and it looks like this:

- Create a splinter group of BNP whom the election commission would give the dhaner sheesh symbol.
- Float multiple smaller parties and create a loose coalition of Jatiyotabadi forces and civil society elements which will include this fake BNP with Ershad’s JP, Badruddoza’s BDB, PDP, Dr. Kamal Hossain’s Gonoforum etc.
- Ensure that this front gets at least 130 odd seats and a majority or at least enough to hold the balance of power.
- Post election, elect General Moeen U Ahmed as the president of Bangladesh by the obedient governing party.
- Create a national security council under the president to make sure that President Moeen U Ahmed have enough power to control the army after his retirement.
- Rule the country via a defacto military-civilian oligarchy
- If any of the above chain of events fail, the election will be stalled. That will also be done in a ‘constitutional’ way. The recent rezoning of the parliamentary districts makes it possible that the stalling of the election will be one law suit away.
- In the event of a violent protests by the political parties, elections will be stalled as well calling it a national security issue and the country will then be effectively ruled by the newly formed national security council or a ‘national unity government’ made up of pet BNP-AL leaders.
Follow the past few months activities, and the next few months, it will all fall into place. Also the recent ICG report has hinted on it as well quoting an unnamed international diplomat.
When or if the dust settles in Bangladesh, we may see a retired army chief as president, another retired army chief as the anti-corruption czar, a retired general administering elections and a security council which takes the advice of three or more generals as to how to manage the country.And this could be the best case scenario for Bangladesh’s civilian democracy.
The bloggers had predicted bits and pieces of this some time ago but as the plan is now getting implemented, there are reasons to get very very worried about it and about our future.
For someone like K Gazi, this is a good scenario to keep the ‘nasty’ politicians in check and have a balance of power. But that completely ignores the reality of Bangladeshi politics and the people. This artificial solution will not work there but rather put the army and the people of Bangaladesh directly on a confrontational path.
This is a potential suicide mission for Bangladesh for four reasons.
1. This puts the political parties in fierce collission course with the government/army and puts our country in the path of instability from which no one will come out as a winner other than the the people who will look for opportunity among chaos and confusion.
2. In this age of electronic media, the level of political awareness among people is at an all time high. The general public of Bangladesh is patiently awaiting a free and fair election as per the road map and is giving this government the benefit of doubt. An engineered election with predictable outcome will swing the electorate against the govt fast and furiously.
3. There is no denying that due to price of essentials and lack of services, the popularity of this government is at an all time low. There are already news of workers’ unrest. International organizations are predicting mass civil discontent against governments across the world. Bangladesh will not be any different. In all likelihood, this discontent may spread like wildfire which will swiftly be joined by the aggrieved political party workers. Will the government be able to control it? Even if it can on the short term — but for how long?
4. Regimes that are created illegally like this has its own way of becoming corrupt and die a fast, horrific and unnatural death. This one will be of no exception. But with it, it will take down the future of our country as well.
So what is the way out? The ICG recommendation lays it out nicely and this is the only viable exit strategy for the current government, if it wants to go honourably. But any dialogues should first start with the immediate stoppage of election commission’s unholy attempt to steal the election symbol of BNP.
So what is the way out which reduces the chance of confrontation the most ?
As per ICG:
To the Caretaker Government (CTG) and the Military:
1. Lift the state of emergency, including complete cancellation of the Emergency Power Rules (EPR), at least two months ahead of any elections to create conditions conducive for free and fair contests.
2. Carry out the following steps ahead of elections:
(a) immediately rescind the emergency ban on all political party activity and freedom of association, as well as press restrictions, and repeal Section 16(2) of the EPR granting immunity from prosecution to the Joint Forces;
(b) continue good faith efforts to adhere to the election roadmap for parliamentary elections by the end of 2008 at the latest, by setting a specific election date and keeping in mind Islamic holidays to ensure full participation;
(c) begin discussions immediately with the main political parties on core political issues not addressed in talks between those parties and the Election Commission;
(d) refrain from using coercive measures to induce and expedite political party reforms and allow sufficient time for party leaders to build support for internal reforms at all levels; and
(e) desist from anti-corruption arrests without warrants or sufficient evidence.
3. Disavow the “minus two” policy as part of the political reform process, and in regard to the trials of Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia:
(a) refrain from interfering and allow them to be held in open court;
(b) conduct them before the general election;
(c) ensure they are speedy and verdicts are delivered in time for the accused to stand for late 2008 parliamentary election if found innocent; and
(d) respect the High Court or High Court of Appeal’s verdicts.
4. Identify and encourage non-partisan national observers to monitor all elections outlined in the roadmap and invite international election observation missions to monitor elections, in consultation with the parties.
To the Parties:
5. Demonstrate a willingness to reciprocate goodwill gestures by the CTG (such as removal of the ban on party activity) by promoting internal party democracy, rejecting those convicted in corruption cases as candidates and forging consensus on an election code of conduct.
6. Promote internal party democracy by:
(a) holding regular elections for all leadership posts at all party levels;
(b) rewarding committed and effective party workers with greater opportunities to rise through the ranks, including running for office, gaining access to funds and other resources for their candidacies and winning promotions to important committees;
(c) selecting candidates to stand for elections who enjoy the confidence of their local party workers; and
(d) determining a quota, in consultation with the Election Commission, for ensuring women’s representation at all levels.
7. Do not boycott the elections, and if they are deemed free and fair by credible observers, accept the results.
To Both the CTG and the Parties:
8. Seek to ensure a smooth transition to democracy and a credible parliamentary election by December 2008 by entering into a dialogue, with a clearly defined agenda from the start, that aims broadly to:
(a) achieve a common minimum commitment on sustaining institutional reforms such as the independence of the judiciary, maintaining a non-partisan public service commission and refraining from political interference in police and army promotions and assignments;
(b) agree on how to ratify actions of the CTG, whether by approving ordinances (which might mean amending current ordinances to make them more acceptable), by a constitutional amendment or by other means;
(c) ensure a smooth transfer of power after elections, with safeguards against retaliatory prosecutions, demotions or transfers of CTG officials and military officers for administering routine ministerial, government and security functions and formulating and implementing institutional reforms such as the Anti-Corruption Commission, Public Service Commission, judicial and other reforms necessary for strengthening democratic functioning, but without foregoing the state’s responsibility under domestic and international law to investigate and prosecute civilian and military officials who have ordered, condoned or directly participated in human rights abuses to enforce the state of emergency;
(d) consider mechanisms for institutionalising pluralism and empowering opposition voices in parliament such as creating a bicameral legislature; repealing Article 70 of the constitution, which imposes rigid party discipline in the parliament; and ensuring meaningful bipartisan participation in parliamentary committees and working groups; and
(e) intensify efforts by the next government to: reduce space for radicalism, cooperate in dismantling terrorist groups and tackle any linkages between violent extremists and state institutions, political parties and politicians, and members of the business community, as well as between violent extremists and organised crime or other sources of domestic and international funding.
9. Include in any agreement a common reiteration of commitment to all fundamental rights, including concrete promises for action in areas such as extrajudicial killings, torture and illegal detention, and protection of minority rights, women’s rights and refugee rights.
10. Hold, upon conclusion of the talks, several roundtable discussions with a wide range of civil society organisations in the six division capitals so as to forge a broader national charter for post-election governance and respect for human rights.
May 1st, 2008 at 9:51 am
Not a single method will work for the Bangladeshi’s as we are one of the most dumb, arrogant, duffers and blind nation on earth who do not want our own good. Try the method people are suggesting now, BD politicians will remain same as before. Just watch the BD news channel and see our politicians are talking like the same way as they used to talk a year and half ago. No one will be able to make understand two most CHEERIA leaders Sheikh Hasina, Khaleda Zia, their sons (TZ and Joy) and their sycophants as they think Bangladesh is their own property. Neither CTG/ARMY nor anybody else can teach them as they do not want to learn. Only if GOD him/herself come down and show some magic then they might be convinced.
Apologise for my language.
May 1st, 2008 at 11:43 am
Sorry to break this to you, Rush. Santa Clause does not really exist. Neither does a magic solution to all our problems.
May 1st, 2008 at 2:05 pm
This all sounds well and good to observers outside of the groups involved in the political arena (military, CTG, political parties). The question is whether there’s enough people influential enough among these groups that can take this to heart as the most beneficial course of action for the country (and not themselves) and move ahead with it. That not only remains to be seen but seems highly unlikely given that the very reason we’re in the current situation in the first place is the inability for all these groups to be acting in the interests of the country. The very reason we needed a neutral caretaker government in place ahead of elections is that of all the parties’ bickering about the others’ corruption and acting on the interests of filling their own pockets when they come to power. At the end of the day, if every time we’re in a situation where we need a kindergarten teacher to bring about some semblance of order among children, then no matter how many “rational” exit strategies, they’re pointless without the actual players of taking them to heart. And if new people do enter the political race with the intention of being different, can they, without force, change the way things work while working against the grind? Looking at all this happening, even WITH a fair election, if the same people are going to be running, I can’t help but feel disenfranchised if all my vote is going to do is put somebody new in a position to abuse their position and get rich.
I wish there was some way to remove all the unnecessary privileges that come from being in a political post. Then the motivation for running for office would only be to serve the country and not the people running.
May 1st, 2008 at 5:21 pm
Is Dr Kamal’s Ganoforum technically “jatiyatabadi”? Many have raised legitimate concerns about his role and silence vs outspokenness on certain issues recently and how it relates to tacit support of the military etc - but isn’t his fundamental ideology at odds with everyone else in that list?
May 1st, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Udayan,
This new force will be a secular Jatiyotabadi force (very much receptive to India) and it will aim at targetting the centrist AL-er and the pre Tareq Zia BNPwallahs. So Kamal Hossain falls in that first category. I have no problem having such front. But I have problems with the mode it will be created and the mode it will be given a position of advantage through unfair means like that of stealing another party’s symbol etc.
Sarwar, indeed, with all the talk about not going back to pre 1/11 politics, this government has done exactly that. It has chosen the path of pre 1/11 confrontational politics rather than the politics of unity, dialogue and consensus. So yes, when personal interest becomes greater than national interest, then confrontation among the stakeholders is the logical outcome.
May 1st, 2008 at 7:12 pm
To teach our arrogant and stubborn political leaders one quick solution is still there. Just form an institute name BIA (like old version of CIA) who will work in the interest of the country. They will do all the sneaky conspiracy with the bad politicians like KZ, SH and others as the way politicians do with us. If necessary the BIA will be given the power to wipe the bad politicians out from the universe like the way CIA used to do in their old days and I believe that CIA still involve with that kind of work. In my view this is the only solution in the context of Bangladeshi politics.
May 1st, 2008 at 10:26 pm
We as a nation are sick with six viruses. They can be named as Awami virus, BNP virus, Jamat virus, Mujib virus, Zia virus, and the Uttar-para [military] virus. From Zia and Mujib virus we have two new strains Khaleda and Hasina viruses and also there are two sub-strains Tarek and Joy.
1/11 was so great chance to get rid of these obnoxious fatal viruses. But the Gen. Moin instead of eradicating all the viruses, by his grand stupidity he himself turned into the most virulent virus and squandered the opportunity.
If I had been the chief physician of the country I would have quarantined all the virus infected agents banning AWL, BNP and Jamat and ushered a new politics with new people, new brains and fresh energy. I don’t see any future for us like Rush doesn’t. We will always love to spin around the axes of all aforementioned sticky viruses. Nobody can free of us from the ever endemic viruses.
Thanks.
May 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 am
Reading some of the comments, I’m tempted to paraphrase Brecht:
The people had forfeited the confidence of the government and could win it back only by redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier
for the government to dissolve the people
and elect another?
—
Udayan, in the topsy-turvy world of post-1/11 reformed politics, things could get lot more baffling. If the regime is successful in carrying out the exit strategy, the opposition will find it very easy to pick up anti-Indianism and pandering to the mullahs to score cheap points. Don’t be surprised if that opposition is led by Awami League.
To be sure, AL’s rightward drift begun much earlier than 1/11. It is not as warm to India as is commonly assumed. For example, Hasina effectively ruled out gas export in 2000-01 when she promised to keep 50 years worth of reserve. And with the MoU with the Khilafat Majlish, it showed it wasn’t above pandering to win election.
If this exit strategy is successful, expect to see posters of Hasina, with the tasweeh in her hand, being pushed by the joint forces, with Allah Akbar prominently displayed next to Joi Bangla.
One can debate the rights and wrongs of those decisions, but that is not my point here.
May 2nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Asif. S
As I said, not a single method will work for Bangladeshi politicians. Neither the KGazi’s nor ICG’s one. If you think that dialogue process would make the politicians understand and change their frame of mind then it would have been worked when both AL and BNP were in a pre election dialogue in 2006. No course of action or method can change the mentality of two duffer leaders of AL and BNP who were only erudite how to lie and show their fake compassion for the BD people. Just imagine about last week speech of AL leader SH while she was in the court. The way she outburst, as if she was in conflict with her personal made servant in her own house. Can we really expect any true democracy from such a low profile leader? I really do not how a sensible person can still support these two dumb leaders?
May 2nd, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Jonab Rush, apni thik i bolechen. Amra mukkhu shukkhu Bangladeshi ra ei duffer netri der niyei thaki. Apni Bangladesh bad diye apnar shopno rajjo niye thaken.
May 2nd, 2008 at 3:05 pm
George W Bush ke je jai boluk, duffer bolbe na keu? Ki bolen? Duffer hole to, US army take shoriye, shob politician-der lesson ‘teach’ korte chaito.
Rush, on a serious note, you are right that politicians are talking the same language. But that is because they are emboldened by the failure of this govt. If you check back our write ups from before, this is what we were always afraid of — the failed politicians somehow again becoming heroes — through the inept handling of CTG. Now it is happening.
Time to cut our losses. Both the sides need to give in in a possible discussion and as conscious citizen of the country, we can put pressure on both sides to negotiate a meaningful settlement.
If the people see the sincerity from the CTG and the parties don’t change, the tide and sympathy will again turn against the parties. But that sincerity is missing. Don’t underestimate the general public in Bangladesh. They are more aware than you think they are.
May 2nd, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Asif #11,
Cannot compare Bush failure with BD politics, because:
1) Bush, family and Cabinet has not personally profitted and ransacked their OWN nation in the name of “democracy”
2) Bush and US politicians have not held US hostage by constant hartals, boycotts oborodh and mastani
3) There HAS been calls in public to impeach him for misleading US to war, but is covered by Congress agreement prior to war.
4) He has legally used the political system to take his (failed) actions.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:09 pm
Kgazi # 12.
Asif bhai did not compare G.W. Bush with Bangladeshi politicians. He suggested that it is hopeless to believe that armed forces can reform politics in any part of the world.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Raihan, #13
No Asif said no matter what Bush does, army does not go out to teach him a lesson, which in effect, compares the extent of Bush politics and BD politics, which are akash-patal different, which I explained.
Had Bush politics been same as BD politics (totally corrupt, illegal, profitting, criminal and extortional) then if not Supreme court, but US army would have removed him.
Politics is not the same in all parts of the world, each nation has to resolve in their own way, based on what resources they have. First President of USA Washington was a General, and
BD has no effective judiciary, police, checks & balance, and under those conditions - CTG can only use army to CORRECT the PATH to democracy. Otherwise absolute powered politicians will restore their OWN PERSONAL path.
May 3rd, 2008 at 2:09 am
Mr. Rush, you’re right. Once, one of my favorite columnists sarcastically commented as I try to paraphrase here ….I think as an individual has a fate or luck to be rich or poor, successful or failed, so have the all nations of the world who could be powerful, rich and respectul or ill-fated poor and failed. And Bangladesh is such a nation of bad luck and will never do better….. All our hopes turn to hollow wish; dreams get doomed and all endeavors end in failures.
If God doesn’t revise his decision about us nobody can change our nation. The people like Jyoti are addicted with the Yaaba-of-democracy. How the Yaaba-democracy of Bangladesh under the polluted leaders led us to near-failed state they don’t care. They don’t care about where the country has gone to and where it could.
They are desperate to keep their ego victorious. They think if we don’t follow the prescription of our Murrubis, if we can’t correct our history and give due recognition to our national father-mother, brother-sister, Bhai-Bhavi or Shala-Shali or prime declarer or secondary declarer of our independence we can’t survive or thrive.
Our elitists have weird thinking. Before, we used to blame the Pakis and the 9-months long war of independence for our poverty and misery. But we don’t look at how the Vietnamis fighting decade-long war against super-power America now already has established itself as a medium-income country. I don’t know who is the
father-mother figure of Vietnamis. There’re about more than 200 independent countries in the world. I don’t know how many countries have established national Abba-Amma or Swadhinatar Ghoshak or Pathak. But they are doing better than us as they are not divided like us with silly issues as we are with.
Our political leaders become like cult-leaders. We can the doom ourselves and the nation but can’t desacrate our cult-leaders Mujib-Zia-Khaleda-Hasina-Ershad and so on.
I can’t have any suggestion for us but praying to God to have kind look of Him on us and change us to from near-failed-doomed to developed nation.
Thanks.
May 3rd, 2008 at 2:47 am
Cool. As well as the resident India’r dalal and closet Jamaati, I’m also a Yabba-democrat with an ego trip.:)
Jatin Sarkar in his Pakistaner Jonomo Mrittu Dorshon mentions this graffiti from 1970:
Nemok haram jonogon
Kor ge toder nirbachon
Amre chollam Sundarban
Apparently the graffiti was written by Naxalites. According to Talukder Maniruzzaman, most of the leftist leaders (Naxalite as well as pro-Soviet) of that era were from upper middle class background. Many of them are present in this bhodroloke biplob (as key editors, turncoat BNP leaders, and senior bureaucrats). I thought about that comment when I read some of the comments above.
Returning to the reality-based folks, assuming the worst - that the regime is successful in implementing the described entry/exit strategy, we need to ponder these questions:
- what kind of opposition would we want after the election?
- what kind of opposition are we actually likely to get?
- how are we going to reconcile our desired opposition with the likely one?
Instead of having a dialogue of the deaf with KGazi/Rush/Bitterboy (whose sincerity I don’t doubt), I’d like to see discussions about these questions.
May 3rd, 2008 at 3:20 am
KGazi # 14
It seems that you know a lot about “patal”, but a little about the “Akash”. Here is a piece of “Akash”. Enjoy!!!
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bush_administration_cronyism_and_incompetence
May 3rd, 2008 at 6:07 am
KGazi#14
“First President of USA Washington was a General”
Little learning is a dangerous thing.I will take Jyoti bhai’s advice and won’t have further dialogue with you in this thread. Don’t want to kill a serious discussion.
Jyoti Bhai#16
Yabba democrat sounds sexy! Let us form another political party. I am sure Yabba addicted military will fund us in next general election. I request for Foreign ministry in advance.
On a serious note…
- what kind of opposition would we want after the election?
# Anyone but Hasina, “with the tasweeh in her hand, being pushed by the joint forces, with Allah Akbar prominently displayed next to Joi Bangla”.
- what kind of opposition are we actually likely to get?
# Awami League led by detained Sheikh Hasina and her followers. A secular mid-leftist opposition who will oppose the emerging dictators in 80s style.
May 3rd, 2008 at 8:17 am
Would it be fair to say that Asif’s piece is really a compilation of various exit strategies hypothesised by the chatterati, as opposed to being the definitive roadmap that this CTG is following? The alleged existence of such a precise strategy assumes that the three key components of this administration, viz., DGFI, army, and the Advisors are in agreement. Many political observers would beg to differ and alternatively suggest that there is no clear plan at the moment. At best, there is a lengthy and poorly thought-out wish list that may best be described using the famous chant of English football fans — “What a load of rubbish!”
In this sense, Asif gives too much credit to this CTG. Moreover, implementing such a grand scheme requires widespread public support — that is unlikely to be forthcoming.
Sources close to the Government say that there is a grudging acceptance within the higher-ups that the return of the mainstream political parties is inevitable. Therefore, at the moment close-door negotiations are underway between the CTG and the two parties as to what form their comeback will take.
May 3rd, 2008 at 8:38 am
I doubt we Bangladeshis and the commentators here, will ever be able to reach a consensus regarding the best way to move forward politically.
It is quite apparent that the political parties have completely failed to bring about any meaningful change within their parties since 1/11. They have not given the public any sort of commitment regarding issues such as: Hartal, corruption, parliament boycott, cronyism and the role of muscle/money power during elections.
The decent and honest people I know are quite happy with the current state of things.
The rising prices of rice and edibles is a global issue, those who follow BBC/CNN know that prices of food/grains have risen globally. The government concentrated on ensuring electricity and fertilizer supplies to the farmers which has resulted in a bumper boro crop.
Electricity is also a problem, which is a legacy of the corrupt BNP regime.
Other than these two issues people are quite happy with the current regime.
People who are mostly unhappy are:
Good old politicians
Corrupt businesspeople
Overzealous human rights “activists” who are allergic to the role of army in government.
May 3rd, 2008 at 2:55 pm
I agree with #19 by KB. Asif’s article is too much the nightmare feared by the chatteriti. Everything depends on the frantic talks and ‘pre-parley’ going on - nothing is clear cut except that the army has to have an institutional role in the running of the country. And The Intelligence Agency has to be protected from later political retribution. Let’s wait and see instead of frothing on the web.
May 3rd, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Here is my basic Plan B, (done hurriedly on saturday morning): in response to ICG recommendations, which are very ambitious
1. BY LAW, Dissolve the entire CABINET of old politicians from BOTH parties, that existed during pre 1/11, based on FAILURE to contain nationwide political leadership corruption - and holding political position between 1991-2007.
2. Start with a clean slate of politicians.
3. Allow existing parties AL-BNP to run, but BY LAW require them to nominate new leaders
3. Do not make SH-KZ martyrs, but DISQUALIFY them, based on failure to contain political-leadership corruption. Let them go free - but DEBAR (forbid) them from any further political leadership.
Any cross-pollination of old politicians with new system, will result in failure again - and we will be back to 1/11.
May 3rd, 2008 at 4:24 pm
#20
Most Bangladeshis I know are “decent and honest” and many if not most of them are very very unhappy with the current state of things, precisely because they are decent and honest. They invlude the “overzealous human rights activitsts” who will not hesitate to speak up for you when the army comes to pick you up when you have no further use for them, or get in their way through your very existence.
May 4th, 2008 at 8:29 am
#23 These people that “you know” are very very unhappy !! But you have not given any reason why that is?
I have already addressed the food prices issue and the only other reason could be that you are assuming most Bangladeshis are related to Hasina and Khaleda or some other jailed or absconding corrupt politician or businessman and they are upset at their close relatives are in trouble, which is very understandable.
It could be that these people that you know are simply very very unhappy for not being allowed to vote in Tarique Zia or Some other Mujib family member to power?
Playing with words is very easy and people who think they have some sort of god given right to create trouble within the country like Mullah terrorists, Politicized University teachers and students, and corrupt business people should certainly be picked up by the law enforcement authorities , which currently includes the army, and brought to justice for their crime.
But you seem the the kind who will come out and criticize the authorities whenever someone you know or follow is picked up for a crime. You will also question the neutrality of the judges whenever they give a verdict which goes against “your” interest and will call for hartals and boycott etc.
May 4th, 2008 at 10:37 am
Mamoon,
These issues have been debated before where criticism of ctg has been deemed as supporting Hasina Khaleda. Its pretty lame and immature, so no point refuting it. If everything is fine and dandy as you say, then there is nothing to worry about. We should just sleep peacefully. Not sure, why every opinion makers, international organizations, diplomats are suddenly so concerned. Perhaps they did not get the memo that you did. Please pass it on to them and on to us since there is nothing to worry about political instability in the coming days. Please reread my post. My comments are purely focused on what to expect in the future and how to avoid the confrontation which helps no one.
May 4th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
asif, what happens with AL in this scenario? will they not contest the election (in which case, surely election will have little legitimacy)? will they contest but lose (how would this happen, absent rigging, and why would they consent to be part of this?)? surely a likelier (though no happier) scenario would be that, they, too would be part of what you are suggesting, and that there would be a national government including both AL and all the elements that you mentioned in your piece? what am i missing here?
May 4th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Oi Zafar,
Only meant to focus on the exit strategy here. But what AL does is going to decide how this game will be played out.
There are three scenarios:
1. AL does a 1986 and goes to the poll unitedly under SOE and with Hasina in jail.
2. AL boycotts because of Hasina being in jail and the party stays united on this.
3. AL boycotts but the RATS faction of Tofayel, Amu et al joins the election splitting AL.
The nightmare scenario for you know who is 1 and 2. Because with number 2, the election will have no credibility. With number 1, AL does have a very good chance of sweeping the parliament with a strong majority and Hasina will be as powerful as ever. The strong majority under a united AL with Hasina behind bars can possibly be stopped via some other means but I hope the CTG won’t go that route.
Unless RATS absolutely think there is no grassroots support behind them, option number 3 would happen most likely. That means — Hasina, thinking that AL will never be allowed to come to power,asks AL to boycott the election. But RATS would say we will win the election and free our leader. So AL will be split. In this case there are more chances for the Kings party to succeed. But if RATS can actually make AL victorious in the election, that will be an interesting result and will put Hasina in a bad position curtailing her power (which may not necessary be a bad thing). So expect to see more rough treatment on Hasina next few days so that she actually decides against joining the election.
Surely these are all speculation and as KB said, a lot of people in the decision making body have not figured it out yet but this is the most likely way they will proceed if things remain as they are today. The situation is changing every day and with that strategy will change for the power brokers as well.
May 4th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
#24
On the contrary, people who I know who are unhappy usually focus on a few core issues:
1. Military and CTG lying about who is in control and why. Lack of transparency while supposedly “fixing” democracy
2. Lack of due process and human rights in the arrest, detention and failure to bring to trial and resolution of up to 200,000 political prisoners. Hasina and Khaleda are only 2, albeit high profile, among these. There are literally thousands where we don’t even know their names
3. Extra judicial torture, in and out of custody. Cholesh Ritchil is one extreme example, Tasneem Khalil another, and Tareq Zia appears to be another. You are concerned that people like me are only worried when people we “know or follow” are picked up “for a crime”. Most people will realize that Cholesh Ritchill to Tasneem to Tareq Zia represents a pretty huge spectrum across ideology and socio-economics - hardly a case of just speaking out for our ideological representatives.
4. Allegations of continued corruption and turning a blind eye to family members and allies who are corrupt - so how is this govt different from previous ones, and how can we justify corruption the reason to continue supporting this military govt?
5. No clear path to election
6. Muzzling of press
7. Manipulation of democratic process through attempts to break mainstream parties and create other ones, and letting some parties (eg Jamaat) have a clear run while punishing others (BNP, AL) for same alleged crimes - so hardly creating level playing field.
And so forth. Most Bangladeshis I know have no love lost for Hasina or Khaleda and blame them personally for bringing the country to this current situation. But, thanks to the misactions of the CTG and army, they may even be prepared to give either of them another chance.
You say “only other reason could be …” and don’t touch on any of the issues I raised above. Seems like perhaps the accusation of vested interests should be thrown in the other direction.
May 4th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
#24
You say
“You will also question the neutrality of the judges whenever they give a verdict which goes against “your” interest and will call for hartals and boycott etc.”
Shall we then start a thread on how the Military/CTG has manipulated the judiciary in cases (including those to do with Hasina and Khaleda) since it took over?
A reminder from history that almost every leader of Bangladesh who lasted more than a few months has either found themselves assassinated or behind bars at some point. Creation of due process and accountability would be a fair legacy to leave, if only to safeguard the personal future of everyone leading the current government, both in the military and the civilian facade that represents it.
May 5th, 2008 at 3:38 am
Udayan #28
Your items 1 to 7 listed above are not new problems specific to CTG. These EXACT problems existed in previous pre 1/11 govts too, but only in a MUCH larger scale.
Reason why people may be “unhappy” with current CTG, is because they expected immediate transition overnight, when 1/11 arrived. But as they feel the rocky road to clear 36 years of jungle, they begin to feel disturbed.
CTG took BD out of SHEER HELL in 1/11 - where there was no tunnel, forget the light at the end! In hell, one can only go to WORSER and WORSER levels.
And if there are seven levels of heaven, each better than the previous, CTG basically moved Bangladesh from HELL to the lowest grade of heaven! Now THAT is a huge transition - thats a double promotion, from hell to heaven!
Bangladesh is not in the best heaven yet. There still a few devils and fireballs around, but at least we can now upgrade steadily to higher levels of heaven, until MORE and more people are “happy”.
To use that analogy, if people are unhappy with this CTG, then they SHOULD have been extremely unhappy pre 1/11, unless they rather PREFERRED to be in hell.
May 5th, 2008 at 4:26 am
Just wanted to share that English version of the Delimitation Ordinance of 1976, available on Election Commission Website, is full of printing and spelling mistakes. Even president Sayem’s name is misspelled.
The Ordinance was gazetted on 5th March 1976, howver, it makes reference of two promulgations dated 20th August 1976 and 8th November 1976. This is obviously a printing mistake as these promulgations were made in 1975.
Some one should raise these points so these could be corrected.
May 5th, 2008 at 5:16 am
#20, #24: Mamun
I kind of agree with you.
People are unhappy because they are SICK of army - yes, Bangladesh is allergic to army governance. As you said, SH and KZs supporters are unhappy, that says everything - like it or not, that is Most of the Bangladesh (must be excluding “honest” people you know).
May 5th, 2008 at 6:54 am
The CTG is discussing two specific strategies with the political parties right now. These are,
(1) Holding local government elections first. The elected representatives would then elect the President. The Presidency would be strengthened (Doing exactly the opposite of what Asif and Jalal recommend in this month’s Forum).
(2) Form a “Compact.” This means power-sharing among the elected parties based on agreed formulae, essentially pertaining to the distribution of Cabinet positions.
My guess is that the CTG would be able to do neither for two reasons: First, the political parties realise that this administration is become weaker by the day. There is very little incentive for them, especially AL to compromise. Second, run by a group of out-of-touch elitists this Government is just plain incompetent.
So, as Farid Bakht argues in Forum, that there would be General Elections, with AL winning a majority and the army tip-toeing back to their barracks.
After the elections it’ll be business as usual unless the Election Commission and the ACC can be made tamper-proof now. These two institutions place the greatest checks and balances on politicians. It is alarming that so little work has been to done to make these institutions strong and independent.
May 5th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
#30
Both Khaleda (1991-6)/(2001-6) and Hasina (1996/2001) made repeated pleas for patience and less scrutiny on their lack of progress based on how the rot of the years that came before them could not be fixed overnight.
Am not trying to defend Khaleda or Hasina, but everything you say about CTG, BNP could have said in 2001 or 1991, or AL could have said in 1996. Especially about the relative degrees of hell.
May 5th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
#30,
SH and KZ made pleas for patience, for what? Did they make any annual, biennial, or 5-yearly goals or master plans to curtail crime, corruption, poverty and bad-governance, for which people would anticipate in patience?
What master plans did they have to progress Bangladesh to the next level?
May 6th, 2008 at 12:40 pm
When AL gets in (the preceding 2 years was just a buffer for that event) the oppositions responses will rest on their ability to take defeat like men and the amount of killing and revenge that comes out from those who wear the victors flag.
and yet another groups of politically displaced deshis will move abroad to rebuild their lives.
I hope the victors are graceful in their victory and that their opponents safety, and their opponents minions safety can be ensured. otherwise there will just be lots of body bags, hijacked institutions, investment discontinuities and confusion.
May 6th, 2008 at 4:36 pm
By reading posts in this subject, it seems AL has been chosen to win in the next election. If that is the case, then why waste resources by holding election?
May 6th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Jodi Kichu
Then they will be labeled as an unelected government. Apamor shadharon or oshadharon jonogon do not want to see an unelected government in BD regardless their good or bad work.
May 8th, 2008 at 12:41 am
This is not ‘exit’ strategy, this is ‘Entry’ strategy, GEN Moeen has already declared his ‘dosh dofa’ kormoshuchi for a developed Bangladesh.
May 8th, 2008 at 2:27 am
Zafar/Asif/KB/Others,
I am lot more sceptic about an AL victory. Let me explain (long comments warning).
1. Fundamentals of Bangladesh politics until 1/11.
AL is the largest party in terms of electoral support, but it is well short of majority. It also has often faced challenge from the left (although this has diminished a lot) or splinter groups/rebel candidates.
On the other side, BNP is the largest party, but there are two other large groups: JP and Islamists (of whom Jamaat is the largest, but there are other Islamists whose collective strength is not trivial).
In a two horse race, the Awami side (including left) consistently loses to the Jatiyatabadi side (2001, 1981). In a 6+ horse race (AL, BNP, JP, Jamaat, other Islamists, left, AL renegades) BNP wins (1991). As long as AL is united (no left, no splinter), but the jatiyatabadi-Islamists are fragmented, AL wins (1996).
I contend that these fundamentals have not changed.
2. Electoral arithmetic and the exit/entry strategy.
The idea is to unify the jatiyatabadis under one banner. To the extent that the fundamentals have not changed, it follows that the new jatiyatabadi alliance should be competitive against AL. But it is a bit more complicated.
a. There is no reason to think that the jatiyatabadis are actually going to be united. There is a very high probability of Khaleda loyalists boycotting the election. They won’t be given dhaner sheesh, and EC has said they won’t recognise two parties sharing a name - no BNP (Khaleda). This means that those who had voted dhaner sheesh out of some loyalty to the Zias will stay home, reducing the jatiyatabadi vote.
b. AL will have a serious rebel candidate problem. Large parties like AL and BNP have 3-4 competitive candidates in most seats. In AL the problem is more acute: there are many people who joined the parties in the 1960s under Mujib and Tajuddin, and remained steadfast through the dark days of the 1970s and 1980s, and they all think they deserve a nomination. While BNP rebel candidates will be silenced through anti-corruption cases, AL rebel candidates - with local support - will be encouraged to run. The rebel candidate problem will be particularly severe given Hasina’s absence and the rezoning of the seats.
The gamble for the regime essentially is that the effects of (b) - vote splitting in the Awami side - will outweigh the effects of (a) - Khaleda supporters staying home.
3. New voters.
This is the essential unknowable. In Nazim Kamran’s much publicised 2006 study, new voters were shown to be completely uncommitted. If these voters flock to AL, that might give AL the edge. But they could also move to the king’s front. I don’t presume to have any idea about what the 20 somethings in Bangladesh are thinking.
—-
Given above, I don’t buy the idea that an AL victory in a fair (but not free) election is a foregone conclusion. The likely scenario is perhaps something like this: AL 120-130, BNP 80-100, smaller pro-regime parties 50-70 with the rest going to the Islamists and independents.
The thing is, even in this scenario, AL’s support will be needed to amend the constitution. It is conceivable that Hasina can bless AL’s pariticipation given everyone expects an AL win. But I find it very hard to believe that she will bless a constitutional amendment after the election. So, if this comes to pass, expect an AL split after the election, with RATS taking 50 or so MPs to the king’s side.
The more interesting scenario is, however, if AL can manage to win a convincing victory against the odds. If Tofail can deliver AL 160 seats, will he bow to Moeen? Why should he do that when he knows that a President Moeen will hold the real power over a PM Tofail? But if he can deliver AL 160 seats (Hasina managed 146 in 1996), why would he surrender leadership to Hasina either? If this comes to pass, won’t Tofail claim the mantle of Mujib and refuse any deal with the army?
—-
Mamoon, this idea that ‘most people I know are really happy with the regime’ is nonsense. If the regime itself was confident about its popularity, it would have called a referendum by now. It knows that this is not 1977 and no one will buy a phoney referendum, and it realises that its popularity is not all that high. This is why it’s resorting to all sorts of political maneuvering.
May 26th, 2008 at 12:26 am
[...] It is in this context that I write this post. I am well aware of the pitfalls of a less-than-ideal exit strategy. I’ll return to this issue towards the end of the [...]
July 30th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
[...] More recently, the strategy was described as: Create a splinter group of BNP whom the election commission would give the dhaner sheesh symbol. Float multiple smaller parties and create a loose coalition of Jatiyotabadi forces and civil society elements which will include this fake BNP with Ershad’s JP, Badruddoza’s BDB, PDP, Dr. Kamal Hossain’s Gonoforum etc. Ensure that this front gets at least 130 odd seats and a majority or at least enough to hold the balance of power (details here). [...]