Mon 28 Jan 2008
Almer’s era defining piece from today’s New Age.
I write, therefore I am. Every time you tell me not to, I will tell you back.
I write, therefore I am
by Zayd Almer Khan
I write. That’s what I do. You tell me not to. Repeatedly, like a broken record. Sometimes rather coyly, sometimes cajolingly, sometimes more firmly. But always with a tone of authority, even superiority in your voice – entirely false in their assumptions as those assertions might be. You try to intimidate me, when in fact you are intimidated by my words. The words I write. Because my words are written out of conviction. Conviction in democracy. Conviction in the people’s ability to decide for themselves. Conviction in the electorate’s right to choose its own steward. Conviction in the absolute necessity of the steward to be accountable to the electorate at all times. Conviction against autocracy. For you are autocracy.
I speak. That’s what I do. I speak my mind. You tell me not to. No coyness here, because you think I’m vulnerable, my licence to speak cancelled by you with the stroke of a stooge’s (sorry, judge’s) pen. But in fact it is you who is vulnerable to my words. The words I speak. Because my words are spoken out of conviction. Conviction in justice. Conviction in fairness. Conviction in rule of law. Conviction in due process. Conviction against persecution, however ‘noble’ the motive. For you are the persecutor.
I think. That’s what I do. I think quietly, and out loud. You tell me not to. Not much you can do there, but you do your best by gaoling my thought leaders, by torturing the conscience of the nation. When in fact you are tortured by my thoughts, and what they might lead to. Because my thoughts are formulated out of conviction. Conviction in the people’s will. Conviction in a more politically aware nation. Conviction in a culture of debate, a culture of protest. Conviction in a society where all viewpoints, however contrary, are accommodated and appreciated. Conviction against a miniscule, conceited elite, in the guise of civil society, imposing its self-serving ploy to depoliticise the nation. For you are that conceited elite.
I listen. That’s what I do. I listen to the cries of the people, from the streets of the capital to the paddy fields afar. You tell me not to. You beat up the desperate mob, asking for fair prices, fair wages, fair justice. You stifle their voices when in fact it is you who feels stifled. Because their cries are out of conviction. Conviction in a more egalitarian economic order. Conviction in a price regime that allows basic sustenance. Conviction in the farmer’s right to a fair price, the labourer’s right to a fair wage, the commoner’s right to a fair trial. Conviction against lumpen opportunism that plunges the nation into chaos by embarking on an ill-conceived ‘experiment’ because you know you can walk away from it without personal consequence – after all, who are you accountable to anyway? For you are that opportunist.
I see. That’s what I do. I see with my eyes wide open. You tell me not to. You blindfold me into custody, calling me a cheat, a thief, a traitor. But I still see cheating, thievery and treachery abound. And it is you who chooses to be blind to things that I see so clearly. Because, even blindfolded, I see with my convictions. Conviction in good governance, not just mala fide attempts to install so-called ‘good governors’ who are just as bad. Conviction in cleansing the system rather than play musical chairs with those who man it. Conviction in institutional reforms rather than personal vendetta. Conviction against the status quo. For you are the status quo – really, you are no better.
I write. That’s what I do. You tell me not to. But I keep on writing. It infuriates you. But you forget, whatever your might, you are my servant, not I yours.
I write, therefore I am. Every time you tell me not to, I will tell you back.
http://www.newagebd.com/edit.html
January 28th, 2008 at 7:54 am
Shabash Almer. Likhe jao. Karo jonno mookh bondho korbe na.
January 29th, 2008 at 12:17 am
New Age editor, Mr Nurul Kabir, has been banned from attending all kind of TV talk shows. These order was given in a recent comminication.
January 29th, 2008 at 1:38 am
Rumi,
Can you please cite the source of your information that the New Age editor ‘has been banned from attending all kind of TV talk shows’?
January 29th, 2008 at 3:38 am
Yes my source this time was the news editor of a leading TV station in Dhaka. I would not name any name here for valid reasons. I worry about the safety of journalists in Bangladesh.
Do you also need the source of news of
1. CSB closure
2. Recent closure of live TV talk shows.
3. Arrest and toture of jourmalist Akash.
4. Detention of cartoonist Arif
5. Dokhol of TV channels like Channel 1, NTV, TRV.
6. Dokhol of newspapers like ‘Bangladesh Today’.
7. 40 tk/kg rice
8. 100 tk /L cooking oil.
9. Army chief’s illegal activity of giving political speech in radio TV.
or
10. The unelected nature of current government.
January 29th, 2008 at 4:28 am
Newage has been doing pretty good job. Thanks for posting the article.I hope our advisors have read this one.
January 29th, 2008 at 7:14 am
Khub bhalo laglo pore - likhe jan! (and kuddos to New Age for printing this!!)
January 29th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Newage has been doing pretty good job. Thanks for posting the article.I hope our advisors have read this one………….What good job they have been doing apart from relentless unconstructive criticism? Advisors have more important work than reading the article of Newage who are trying to fulfil the political party’s hidden agenda.
January 29th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Rush,
two questions. What do you think the role of media is in a democratic country? Is it that of a watchdog or a lapdog?
Secondly, how do you rate the “constructive role” US media played right before the invasion of Iraq when they cheerled the Bush administration to Bagdad in the name of embedded reporting? Did that help the US or hurt them in the long term?
January 29th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
The revolution will not be brought to you by BTV
in four parts without commercial interruptions.
There will be no pictures of men in uniform
beating down desperate mob in the instant replay.
There will be no highlights on the ten o’clock
news and no pictures of corrupt army officers
perfecting their version of “wealth creation”.
And you will not stop writing
because the revolution will not be televised.
January 29th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
Very encouraging to see a gutsy, lyrical ‘BraveHeart’ like war cry against the autocratic generals, even if it is rather abstract for an editorial.
It almost makes me want to forgive NewAge for supporting the arrest of cartoonist Arif and their calls for the ‘disciplinig’ of Prothom Alo sub-editiors after the Muhammaed-Cat incident.
January 29th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
#7, rush,
this is the result of the important work of the advisors:
1.essentials are out of the reach of common people
2.economic activities have come to a halt
3.”Operation Aziz market” on DU students
4.poor poeple have been made homeless and jobless
5.voice of media has been suppressed
6.finally, making way for the army to rule us
in democracy, voices of all sections of society should reach the center of power.criticism of this Govt sounds ‘unconstructive,please tell us why do you find this article ‘unconstructive’.
Newage or political party does not work with hidden agenda. Only an unelected, unconstitutional govt who goes to power thru coup work with hidden agenda,because with guns and tanks,they don’t need people’s mandate to stay in power. But there is always someone like
NurHossain who can stand in front of the gun and say ” gonotontra mukti pak”, there is always someone like Zayd Almer Khan who can say
“Because my words are written out of conviction,
Conviction against autocracy. For you are autocracy.”
You need a lot of courage and ‘conviction in democracy’ to write this and publish this at a time when its normal to be followed by NSI if your name comes out with Tasneem Khalil. you can ban a TV talk show or send anyone to jail at gunpoint, you don’t need courage to do that.
January 29th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Era defining, yes. Also era defying.
January 29th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
[...] with their priorities. While their chief competition has been courageously standing up for freedom of expression in our country, Daily Star and Prothom Alo prefer to devote their column-space to issues like which prisoners are [...]
January 30th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Asif. S
#1. In one word the role of media is ‘development’ of the democratic society by providing correct and analytical information, not the other way round. But unfortunately some of our journalist works as an agent or a lap dancer for some particular political parties. Whoever controls the media they can use it to persuade the people believe, like the way Hitler spreaded hatred of Jews in the early 19th century by his book ‘My Struggle’. In BD some media moguls do the same if things do not go in favour of them.
#2 If you believe that our army back CTG is doing the similar sin as Mr. Bush did, then you actually are concerned about your journalist friends not concerned about the country.
January 30th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Correct and anaylitical information is what all of us are looking for but who is to say which one is correct. The judge has to be rather objective and analytical as well, no? While I agree that some of our journalistic friends are heavily partisan, to put all journalists in that table is like saying all businessmen are cheats, all students are mastans, all teachers are politicians and all army folks are saviour of the nation. The labelling is simplistic. The devil is, as they say, in the details. Whether New Age has been rhetorical or unobjective should come from a bit more analysis from your part.
2. No. The point I was trying to make with that example is simply that when journalists leave their duty of being analytical and stop being the watchdog like they did in the USA about Iraq, its the general public who are the biggest losers and disaster happens. Unparrallel, unchecked and uncriticized power has never brought anything good for any country other than producing tyrants. Bangladesh is no exception either. If little papers like New Age are providing that little balance, all power to them. Perhaps new Age’s coverage is also partisan. Perhaps not. But this paper still offers the dissidents a bit of a space that no other papers do.
I did a review of bangaldeshi media in June which has specific references. You may again label it as “anti ctg” by being simplistic again but if you dig in to the details you will see that there is a point about media’s role. These criticisms are meant for turning things around so that things get better.
Also terming something propaganda has been a fairly old trick for people who are nervous about criticisms. We have seen that all too mcuh in the past 36 years. Only parties without conviction on what they are doing will be nervous not to be able to strongly defend their positions. Here is the piece.
http://www.himalmag.com/2007/june/cover_feature_bangladesh_media.htm
February 12th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Here is an article about journalists.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2251982,00.html
Admin ignore my last post.