Mon 26 Nov 2007
Zafar Sobhan
He who saves one life, saves the world entire.
–Talmud
A traveler was walking along a beach when he saw a woman scooping up starfish off the sand and tossing them into the waves. Curious, he asked her what she was doing. The woman replied: “When the tide goes out, it leaves these starfish stranded on the beach. They will dry up and die before the tide comes back in, so I am throwing them back into the sea where they can live.”
The traveler then asked her: “But this beach is miles long and there are hundreds of stranded starfish, many will die before you reach them — do you really think throwing back a few starfish is really going to make a difference?”
The woman picked up a starfish and looked at it, then she threw it into the waves and said: “It makes a difference to this one.”
–Popular fable
It’s a never-ending story: floods, cyclones, death, destruction. Inside the country, the events had a deadening familiarity. The days of foreboding as, literally, the storm clouds gathered The heightening anxiety with the periodic escalation of the official danger level. The collective holding of our breath and sense of impending doom as the storm hit. And the desperate rush for shelter and safety before, during, and after, that sadly left far too many behind and unprovided for.
The absolute heroism of those millions who have had to suffer through the cyclone’s ravages. The desperate search for the survivors and to get relief to the tens, if not hundreds, of thousands stranded without food or water or shelter. The mounting death toll from disease and lack of safe drinking water that we would have hoped we could minimise.
There will be time enough later for recriminations and a full accounting. Certainly, we have done many things right, such as the building of thousands of shelters, but, as ever, it is never enough. Relief efforts and coordination have been decent, but, as ever, they could and should always have been better.
The word trickling in from the outlying districts and sandbar islands is that the death toll may be far higher than anyone had originally imagined. In an on-going tragedy of this scale, it is simply extremely hard to come up with a full picture so soon. Sadly, the death toll will continue to rise as all the information comes in.
Hardened reporters and relief workers are shocked and appalled by what they have seen. There are some things in life you can never get used to, no matter how many times you see them.
Disasters like this one always prompt enraging editorials and comments overseas about how Bangladesh is a benighted, God-forsaken country. How hopeless things are. How we are conspired against by the elements. How there is nothing to be done.
These perspectives are infuriating, but in the final analysis, not so important. But what is truly distressing is that many inside the country have also internalised this view and also believe that Bangladesh is doomed, that it doesn’t matter what you do to improve it, things of this nature will always come along and wipe out the good.
Indeed, there is credible fear now that with rising ocean levels that vast swathes of the country might be submerged beneath the sea within the next few decades. This being the case, why, the question goes, should we bother to do anything at all?
It is perhaps this mind-set that emboldens the looters and plunderers who have got so rich feeding at the public trough and made their fortunes by robbing the nation. The nation is sinking anyway, so one might as well grab what one can. We can’t save Bangladesh, so we might as well save ourselves. This is, sadly, what too many people in the country think, and this is reflected in the direction the country has gone all these years.
In Bangladesh, we need to come to terms with the fact that we suffer from a real morality deficit as a nation — or at least among the moneyed classes — there is a real moral problem with our indifference to the plight of our fellow countrymen and women.
They say that rats desert a sinking ship, and the root of the problem is the belief that Bangladesh is sinking and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
But while the cyclone may give support to those who believe this, it has also provided a timely reminder to all of us who do not: the vast majority of well-meaning, public-spirited Bangladeshis who get up every day thinking about what we can do to for the country to bring it into the light of a new day.
The cyclone has reminded us of why we do what we do. It is immaterial that Bangladesh might be submerged beneath the seas by the end of the century or if we are besieged by floods that carry away millions. Yes, thousands have died, and in the next cyclone thousands more will — but thousands have been saved, too.
Even as Bangladesh heads towards possible environmental oblivion, we should never stop the work we are doing. Every life saved or made better is precious and worth every effort we make to that end. Perhaps some of those saved this year will be swept away by floods in the next, but still we must continue to save them and do what little we can for them while they are still on this earth.
This is what it means to be a Bangladeshi. I firmly believe that we are on the path to better days and brighter futures, that we can one day create a land of hope and opportunity and safety and dignity for all Bangladeshis.
But whether we eventually can or not is not the issue. Whether I will ever live to see the Bangladesh I dream of in my life-time is not the issue. It is the struggle that is important, not the result.
The cyclone is a tragedy for Bangladesh. And chances are we will be hit by another tragedy of some kind before the decade is out. We will perhaps never be able to save everyone or provide every Bangladeshi the decent life that he or she deserves. But that doesn’t mean that we should stop trying.
Even if millions remain mired in misery, it is not a futile effort to try to lift them out. We won’t get them all, but for the ones we do get, the ones we have lifted out, and for the ones we will lift out in the future, it makes all the difference in the world.
Zafar Sobhan is Assistant Editor, The Daily Star.
The Daily Star
Nov 23, 2007
November 27th, 2007 at 3:04 am
Zafar Sobhan citation from the Talmud in the very first line of the thread, “He who saves one life, saves the world entire. –Talmud” is the manifestation of his inferiority complex [Hinaumonnatar shamil]. Because the very same quotation is present in Al-Quran saying more eloquently as,” Je Keho Ekjon Niraporad Manushke Hautta Korlo She Je Shamogra Manab Jaalti ke Hautta Korlo. Aar Je Keho Ekjon Mansusher Jibon Bachalo, She jen Shamogra Manab Jaatike Bachalo.”
I wonder why Mr. Zafar cited from the Holy Book of the Jews overlooking his own Holy Book. Doesn’t it point to bankruptcy of wisdom of the author?
November 27th, 2007 at 3:31 am
[...] time, Mr. Sobhan is calling us starfish. Now, if we read the rest of his article and delve in his metaphor, that makes us helpless [...]
November 27th, 2007 at 4:31 am
“They say that rats desert a sinking ship, and the root of the problem is the belief that Bangladesh is sinking and there is nothing anyone can do about”
Ans: Well Zafar , as you mentioned the deficiency of Morality It is not the new story.
we did have capability of Surplus but we don’t want to. while some natural disaster
comes our such type of realizations come.
Just need to monitor how long this realization lasts.
November 27th, 2007 at 10:01 am
“These perspectives are infuriating, but in the final analysis, not so important. But what is truly distressing is that many inside the country have also internalised this view and also believe that Bangladesh is doomed, that it doesn’t matter what you do to improve it, things of this nature will always come along and wipe out the good.”
Despite the criticism,i feel the article is eloquent to say the lease and hopelessly, bohemian in its approach, but nonetheless, i do agree with a lot of it, in partcular, the bit quoted above. The country has become both narcisstic in its bounties of development and self loathingly miserable in its weaknesses. Once that mentaility is remonved, progress may be an inevitability. Unfortunately, not everyone shares the mentality of ‘even if its one life saved, it better than nothing’ - as a close friend of mine always says, the worst thing you can do is nothing’ and as reiterated by Dante The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.
(Dante Alighieri)
on that note.. the sooner we start utilising our skills and ability to roll up our sleeves and get stuck in as opposed to hovering in a site of restless glutton, the better.
November 27th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
Tacit,
your reaction is pretty severe on Zafar. But I fail to see how you draw the conclusion that this is an attempt to prolong the military rule. Also can you disagree that our country has been a hari looter- desh for the last n number of years?
Zafar,
well written piece. On the note about lifting people up and being compassionate, what roles do the civil society leads like yourself have? More write ups and talk shows or more hands on activism and moblizing of people — specially young ones?
Admittedly this is the job of political parties. But in the absence of political activities, how does any sort of mobilization happen and does the civil society have any role in it?
November 27th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
Re. Post 1, I don’t think it’s logical, fair or very nice to say that Zafar Sobhan has an inferiority complex or a bankruptcy of wisdom simply because he quotes from the Talmud. That the idea is more eloquently phrased in the Quran according to Bitterboy does not take away from the importance of the message itself. Also, unless Bitterboy knows Zafar Sobhan personally, to speculate that the Quran is Zafar Sobhan’s holy book because he has a Muslim name is also questionable. For all we know, Zafar Sobhan was born to Muslim parents but is an atheist. Or he was born to Hindu parents, then converted to Islam and changed his name. Does either scenario mean that he is not allowed to quote from the Talmud without being personally attacked? Just to clarify, I don’t know Zafar Sobhan, and I have no idea what his religious affiliations, if any, are. I just think that we can accept good ideas no matter where they come from. Additional good ideas are most welcome. Attacking someone for writing something good because of biases against the source is far less welcome.
November 27th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
bitterboy #1
Islam does not disregard Talmud, in fact most of our prophets and fables are from that book. Even in Islam there is the recognition that Talmud preceded Al-Quran.
It is irrelevant where the quotation is from when it comes to helping people.
Farhad
November 27th, 2007 at 4:29 pm
Bitter Boy ,
I really don’t find any logic in your comments.
November 27th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
A lot of it what was said about Pakistan here is true about Bangladeshi elites as well.
http://www.drishtipat.org/blog/2007/09/13/hypocrisy-of-pakistans-ruling-elite/
November 27th, 2007 at 6:17 pm
Though I agree with the author’s views in most parts. But I have to admit that I can’t applaud the government and the ‘authorities’ relief efforts easily.
Places like Kuakata and Dublar char were unreachable for the first 3-4 days post-Sidr. I received emails and facebook notes asking me to donate to the ‘team’ going to give out relief from army helecopters and planes just last week.
Today I watched the glorified and hyped-up efforts of the US marines on TV. To my knowledge,they haven’t brought any relief material, only their people (3500 of whom were allegedly already present in BD) and equipment (which, again, i’ve heard can reach us in less than 12 hours if they had to bomb us). The channel-i reporter’s voiced was drowned by the sound of the marine helicopter that reached bagerhaat today,( which the cameraman felt compelled to keep in the frame all the time since the whole crew was possibly also flown in with the chopper so that they got the heroic effort on camera). Nonetheless, I’m still grateful for the effort and the aid provided by the marines in our time of need. I also hope that they’ve learned something from the nation ranked among the top ones for our dexterity in disaster management (also probably fr rising above disaster), given how the marines hadn’t been the most efficient in handling Katrina victims.
The ‘real heroes’, like that lone woman on the sea-side, are the ordinary people. Sometimes the less-affected Sidr victims, sometimes the young idealistic student or professionals who have made the effort to get out there and provide help where the authorities had failed. The bigger heroes are the victims who have been helping each other get back on their feet.
This indomitable spirit of the common Bangladeshi is the one hope that we have left. We never give up trying and we never give up hope. The few rats don’t really represent 14crore+ people who still dream of and strive for a better tomorrow, a better Bangladesh.
November 27th, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Asif bhai, that’s just it. If that’s all our country has been for the last n number of years, a hari-looter desh, then how does that fit in with the incredible bravery and spirit we have been witnessing for the past two weeks?
Mr. Sobhan quoting the Talmud is a little like an American President justifying himself during his state of the union address by referring to Canada’s constitution. Nothing wrong with it, but quite revealing.
November 28th, 2007 at 12:25 am
Bitterboy is right as far as the quotation from the Quran is concerned. And Farhad bhai, thank you for saying what I was about to say.
Now with full apologies to the moderators, I would like to take this occasion to rant a little bit about those who quote the Quran to suit their own ideological ends. ESPECIALLY when the full quote is absent. If you feel this comment too detracts from the point of the post, feel free to moderate it out.
The quote comes from the 32nd ayat of the 5th Surah in the Quran “Al Mai’da” or “The Table/The Table Spread” (Yusuf Ali). The full ayat is this courtesy of Yusuf Ali:
Now the questions posed by me for bitterboy and the theologians are three-fold:
(1) when the man is trying to do a good thing through his writing, does it matter what book he quotes and does the Holy Quran itself prescribe bringing up UNNECESSARY arguments instead of pursuing the right course of action during catastrophes like this?
(2) When the Holy Quran itself says that such a message came to the “Children of Israel”, is Zafar Sobhan’s quoting of it from that source a sin/crime? (Think very carefully before you answer)
(3)Why wasn’t the ayat from the Holy Quran quoted in full in #1? Feel free not to answer this.
November 28th, 2007 at 12:43 am
Excuse the mistake, the link above shows it to be the 33rd ayat.
It is actually the 32nd Ayat of the 5th Surah. Different translations here.
http://islamawakened.com/Quran/5/32/
November 28th, 2007 at 1:49 am
Mr. So # 6/Farhad # 7,
Thank you folks for your comments on my comment about the quote from Talmud. I believe in religion, ain’t an atheist. I have respect for Thalmud and other heavenly books. I believe, the three religions, their books and their followers are just like sibling to each other. I have profound respect to all of them. But I want to emphysize here the teaching ” Know thyselves.” Many a times we try to show up our over-smartness and expanse of knowledge by following, citing and using non-indeginous exotic stuff.
Mr. So rightly said there maybe so many case scenarios or hypotheses about the religious affilations of Mr Zafar. But most likely hypothesis is , as there is no Jews in Bangladesh, Mr. Sobhan is not a jew; also he is not a Hindu or christian or buddhu as names tell; but maybe an atheist as they are born in the house of any religious faith and take the names of their family and get a natural
selection to be atheists without warrantig legal conversion or name change.
But I bear the view that those who are atheists should have the guts like Late Ahmed Sharif, Humayun Azad, Taslima etc to come out of their religious camouflage. It’s immoral stay hided and act as atheist. It’s just cheating the society. I personally won’t like my kids will be educated, istructed or guided by an atheist. So, if they don’t reveal themselves there is ample chance that my naive kids will be on their hands and may take them their model. And this is how people may be cheated by covert atheists.
I don’t believe and dare to say Mr Zafar is not a muslim or atheist. And It’s not a any grevious wrong to quote from other religions, other philosophies or books. Mr. Zafar might have randomly gotten the quotation from somewhere and used it with a very good mind. But contention is that we have some elites who being muslim doesn’t have good study on Islam and quite uncomfortable with own religion but feel comfortable to affiliate with others and start reading, Geeta, bible, talmud etc and start criticizing his own one.
Sometimes we first engage in seeking harmful self-inimical knowledge and fill all the receptors of brain leaving none for any beneficial knowledge and we can no longer return to selves.
It’s not appropriate to mandate or expect that every muslim should know every verse of Al-Quran. But the pitty thing is, many of our intellectuals turn back to their own origin without knowing it fully and love to flirt with the others.
BTW, any reader have the every right to critisize the author about his write-ups and excuse of personal attack in such case is not tenable. The greater the celebrity, the more rights they lend to the readers to criticize their acts. Mr. Zafar Sobhan has by this time established himself as an celebrity-level intellect. So we have, as readers, acquired the right to criticize his authoriship, no scope hushing us with the excuse of personal attack.
Mr. So doesn’t know anything about Mr. Zafar. So do I. And therefore, my attack or cricism can’t be anything personal.
Thanks.
November 28th, 2007 at 9:58 am
Bitterboy:
1. Actually, your original post was a personal attack, and insulting and offensive.
I quote:
“Zafar Sobhan citation from the Talmud in the very first line of the thread … is the manifestation of his inferiority complex.”
This is mere (and specious,I might add) hypothesis on your part. As you concede, you don’t know me or know anything about me, but you ASSUME that my use of the Talmud quote is a manifestation of some kind of self-hatred. This is offensive.
Perhaps I was trying to make a point about (in your words) “the three religions, their books and their followers are just like sibling to each other.”
You need to learn the difference between substantive criticism and personal attack.
2. If, for argument’s sake, a Jewish American wrote a piece in the NYT, quoting the Quran, I dare say there would be plenty of people writing in to criticize him.
We would find such criticism, small-minded and repugnant, evidence of bigotry and hatred, and be appalled.
Your response is, sadly, no different. Frankly, it makes one seriously question your professed belief that Jews and Muslims are brothers.
3. “But contention is that we have some elites who being muslim doesn’t have good study on Islam and quite uncomfortable with own religion but feel comfortable to affiliate with others and start reading, Geeta, bible, talmud etc and start criticizing his own one.”
Perhaps. But why do you assume this applies to me? In fact, how dare you assume this applies to me and throw out such an accusation with nothing to support it?
Have you ever read anything I have written on religion? Find me ONE piece of writing in which I suggest that other religions are superior to Islam or suggest a greater affinity to a religion other than Islam or denigrate Islam as a faith — and I will eat the damn thing.
And if you can’t find such a piece (you won’t be able to, no such writing exists), the intellectually honest thing would be to retract and apologize. I won’t hold my breath.
4. Atheism. It is funny that you say that atheists (not that I am one, not that it is any of your business, anyway) should have the guts to state their beliefs openly, and then you cite Humayun Azad approvingly.
This makes you sound very foolish. Don’t you remember what happened to him? He was attacked and almost killed.
In a climate where people spread hatred and intolerance by saying things like they wouldn’t want their children taught by atheists, and where atheists can face physical attack, if atheists wish to keep their beliefs to themselves, surely this is understandable?
5. You know who I am, would you mind very much letting me know who you are?
6. How come you haven’t responded to DhakaShohor’s rather good questions? Cat got your tongue?
Tacit:
“If that’s all our country has been for the last n number of years, a hari-looter desh, then how does that fit in with the incredible bravery and spirit we have been witnessing for the past two weeks?”
No one, not I, and not Asif, ever said that that is “all” the country has been. In fact, a simple reading of my piece, would make pretty clear that I do not think that is “all” we are.
However, you have dishonestly restated my (and Asif’s) argument to make your point. Nice.
The two points:
(1) the nation has been looted and robbed blind, lo these may years, and
(2) great heroism has been shown by the BD people these last two weeks
are not mutually exclusive.
If you can’t see the absurd illogic of what you just wrote, I am afraid that I can’t help you.
Secondly, please either provide support for you assertion that my piece is an attempt to prolong military rule, or withdraw it. That would be the intellectually honest thing to do.
And similar to Bitterboy, who exactly are you, if you don’t mind my asking.
I think I have a right to know who a such vocal (and, I might add, clearly ill-motivated) critic of me is. Only seems fair. One shouldn’t have to respond to essentially anonymous smears.
If you do not appreciate the moniker ill-motivated, please note that you have on more than one occasion accused me of working to prolong military rule.
You provide no evidence to support this, as there IS no evidence, as it is not true.
Best,
Zafar Sobhan
November 28th, 2007 at 10:51 am
#15 Zafar
Others
Using silly arguments over religious practices or preferences is a clever ruse to divert attention from the real issues. That, from what I can see, was bitterboy’s actual intent. Why else would he start a storm about a one-line quote,just used to set the context for an article? I’m pretty sure he would’ve had the same reaction if ZS had quoted Easop’s fables, as opposed to Alif Laila.
I don’t see why each one of us felt the need to divert attention towards bitterboy, and not talk about what is being done and what more that needs to be done to help Sidr victims and help the nation gain back lost confidence.
November 28th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
As far as i am aware nobody is openly calling for the aerial raid on DS1 offices with dogs and helicopters. Why do you midea/human rightsy people get so melodramatic over this kind of stuff.
DS2,
1)No, though a more precise sourcing would be nice, i mean even you went so far as googling down the quranic ayah. Its throw away nature doesnt offer me much insight into Jewish scripture. The ‘fabled’ aunty with the star fish gets a whole lot more context.
2)No. It does not mean that he is a vegan either. Who is talking at the crime/sin level here anyway?!? This entire sidetrack is just a question of taste. The original sin thing too.
If this were real life, comment 1 would have been a chuckle in response to the naffness in article 1, shared by some others who ‘got’ the joke. Their giggling would be resented by the authors allies.
Unfortunately these allies find it hard to silence the laughter as these are not employees or competitors laughing at them, who can be fired or out-finnessed. I think it might be infectious though, the post-chuckle resentment, reflection and justification is even more amusing in a mad sinking titanic sort of way.
3) Not very relevent, like most of your questions, but interesting. People often memorise certain parts of ayahs incompletely, you know many of them are very long. Perhaps you are invoking ‘complicit silence’ again. oh dear.
My offering is that #1 linked to the content of the lesson, rather than the previous community that Allah addressed it to.
As for the coincidental or intentional cuddly abrahamic interfaith stuff, who knows? who actually cares?
November 28th, 2007 at 1:29 pm
The people who are often gleefully accused of robbing the nation blind and the people who are now celebrated as being heroic and resourceful aren’t two distince entities. The first come from the second, and the second elect the first.
Then, let us take the article itself. It’s headed “Starfish Nation.” Then in the article, you make the point that starfish just passively lie on the beach until someone comes and throw them all back in the water to save their lives. So, if we are to take that parallel and extrapolate it, what do we get? That we’re a passive nation just waiting for a savior to come along, a savior like the woman on the beach.
Add to that the fact that we’re now under military rule, and the list of saviors suddenly shrinks. Gosh, I wonder whom you could have in mind?
Please note that you’re not obliged to respond to my “smears.” If you choose to do so, that is because it strikes a nerve.
On a different matter, I’d like to add my two cents: I don’t think it’s a sin/crime to quote from the Talmud. In fact, I’m hard-pressed to find when quoting someone or something can be a crime, unless you’re quoting Groucho Marx.
I think it’s just a minor aesthetic point. Either Mr. Sobhan was or was not aware of the similar passages in the Holy Koran. If he was, then he made the decision that he’d rather quote the Talmud than the Holy Koran. For whatever reason.
If he wasn’t aware, well then, he’s just a person who knows his Talmud better than he knows the Holy Koran. And once again, DP has taught someone something (collective pat on the back, I think).
November 28th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
How can it be acceptable to profess that one has respect when one is then so disrespectful here? And perhaps if this had been the only time, it would still be more bearable. How can anyone go off on a Know Thyself rant when that person doesn’t know the subject of the rant? My point when I mentioned Zafar Sobhan’s religious affiliation is that it is not actually relevant what that affiliation is. If Bitterboy wishes to stereotype atheists as immoral, evil, sneaky little cheats, then he has the right to expose the prejudice and limitations of his own personal religious beliefs (as opposed to the beliefs that are actually espoused by Islam). Bitterboy claimed that the word attack is being used as an excuse, yet he didn’t write about Zafar Sobhan’s authorship…He wrote about Zafar Sobhan. Moreover, instead of celebrating what is good or engaging in any constructive criticism about Zafar Sobhan’s views on the cyclone and its effects, Bitterboy then claimed that there is justification in his arguments because of Zafar Sobhan’s celebrity.
While I agree with Fariha that we should not let ourselves be diverted from the real issues and that the cyclone is a far more urgent need, I still think that addressing common decency among people is important.
November 28th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
Tacit,
You are confusing shoshok and shoshito.
We are talking about the elites and the feudal lords on one hand and not the oppressed who are trying to make it in spite of all odds. Just because the oppressed is feared into voting between lesser of two evils every 5 years does not make them part of the problem.
November 28th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Asif
“Just because the oppressed is feared into voting between lesser of two evils every 5 years does not make them part of the problem.”
Ans: Then what is the solution? We are speaking about the problem. Currently we may not choose lesser evil but we are already knee bending to the Devil. Bitter truth is that our elite is no more intellect , they all are Bunch of hypocrites and support@devil.com
November 28th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Tanoy, (21)
We are moving off track here. I am not defending the current status quo and neither am I talking about just politicians. It includes the entire ruling elite. The solution is in a social change on how the elite class views common mass — a change in mindset which is I believe the focus of Zafar’s piece.
November 28th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
Asif ,
Here is my point on conclusion in whole thread
here’s what I have to say. The Tacit/Zafar fight is petty. It is this kind of fight that has allowed people like Razakars to survive this many years and look so strong. So my suggestion would be to unite against Razakars. The Bitter Boys are getting chance
to spread venom.
If you really think about it, you will see that the military is in power because the two major political parties let them come into power. Its time to look at the bigger picture. The parties should disagree, but not kill each other and leave the field open for the military and Islamists.
November 28th, 2007 at 8:51 pm
I wasn’t going to elaborate on this sordidness after comment 16 decided to put some sanity back into the conversation. But people like fugstar are the reason why people like bitterboy get away with stupidity while people like ZS suffer.
Let me be very clear. Bitterboy contradicts himself in two sentences in comment #14. He says,
“Know thyself” goes unattributed, which is what ZS should have done (not that it would have made a difference). “Know thyself” is not a quotation from the Quran. It is a saying of PAGAN, GREEK philosophers. Doesn’t that - by his OWN criterion - show over-smartness, “citing and using non-indigenous exotic stuff”?
Why should he get away with it with his taste unquestioned by himself and his friend fugstar while Zafar Sobhan does not? THAT really is what’s bothering me.
So with apologies to Fariha, who really made a great point, let me say this. You forgot to add that bitterboy and his kind would not pick on just anybody. And that is why this is important.
If hypothetically, ZS had a body of writing spreading hate against religious minorities, if he had a record of anti-independence activities, if he had a record of ranting against the rights of women - well then, he could have quoted the Talmud, the Torah, the Vedas and maybe even the Greeks in support and people like bitterboy would not distract us, and people like fugstar would not “share” some untold joke about him. In fact, they would cheer him on to show how tolerant “their side” is!
Well it’s not a freaking joke. It’s this same attitude that has got a cartoonist in jail while a Shibir-backed newspaper went scot-free for publishing the same joke behind the cartoon. THAT is what is at stake. That some people think they can take liberties with religion by quoting the Quran in half. That some people think that it’s a joke when persons DEEMED BY THEMSELVES to be secular quote the Talmud, but NOTHING at all when bitterboy, whose track record everyone knows on DP, quotes the Greeks. “No jokes there folks, walk on, walk on.”
Lastly, the best thing to do is to apply these standards to bitterboy himself. He wants atheists to identify themselves so that his children are not led astray. Well I want this Greek-quoting commenter to identify his religious affiliation before he starts quoting the Quran: What exactly are YOUR Islamic credentials?
fugstar,
not to get too personal or anything, but I think most people who’ve read our comments over the last few months know exactly who the more “relevant” one is between the two of us. And that would include not just DP-ers, but even your Islamist friends.
November 29th, 2007 at 1:46 am
Mr. Zafar and his co-defenders wanted to know my identity, very sadly, like somewhat in bullying language. As if the notion is ‘give your complete identity and I’ll see you’.
I’m an unqualified muslim but if I really want to qualifiy myself I can say I’m neither a fundamentalist nor a muslim by name-sake. I am a professional and have been leaving abroad in a number of coutries for about last 20 years, yet, avidly interested in the affairs of Bangladesh like politics, economy, religion, culture, in other words in every aspect of it. BTW, I was a teen-age very passionate organizer of our liberation war. But now, at my mature age with somewhat global living experience, my stand has changed andy say that sea of blood-shed for independence was not worthy. I believe, any war of secession, a territorial independence is, a wrong war merely intrigued by politcial demagogies. And that is fought just to reward the leaders with some lofty accolades like BirShrestha, Bir-uttam, Bir-protik, FON [father on nation], BON, MON, CON etc with huge cost of lives and blood for some spurious aspiration and hopes.
I believe in the bondage of humans to humans by love and spirit of humanity, irrespective of race, religion, language, color, nationality and so forth. And’ also, pride in nationality is just devil’s inspiration to serve the purpose of crooked leaders.
I have one bad stuff in me, I love truthfulness, even if it’s bitter and loath lies. But whatever, I say and do, I do it with a pure and good intention, with the spirit of the famous Hadith, ” Inna Ma Aamalu Binnya/ All actions are judged by intention.”
TYA.
November 29th, 2007 at 2:04 am
bitterboy,
we know who you are.
November 29th, 2007 at 3:53 am
Bitter Boy
Some days back you wanted proof of every dead body before you will acknowledge its a genocide, similarly we want proof from you that you were the teen age organizer of 71.
May be you were. but It might be for peace Committee. But I don’t like to speak on assumption. Just prove some thing on behalf of your statement other wise stop mockery of 71.Then I will believe my assumption is correct. Because no freedom fighter is speaking on your language.
November 29th, 2007 at 4:52 am
#24
” You forgot to add that bitterboy and his kind would not pick on just anybody. And that is why this is important.”
AGREED!!!
#25
“I believe, any war of secession, a territorial independence is, a wrong war merely intrigued by politcial demagogies. And that is fought just to reward the leaders with some lofty accolades like BirShrestha, Bir-uttam, Bir-protik, FON [father on nation], BON, MON, CON etc with huge cost of lives and blood for some spurious aspiration and hopes.”
So far, in the last 23 years of my life, I’ve only heard Pakistanis and un-enlightened bideshis refer to 1971 Liberation War as a war of ’secession’ or ‘territorial independence’. My Pakistani friends refered to our War of Independence as the ‘Secession of Dhaka’ and ‘Territorial Independence of East Pakistan’. You’re the first Bangladeshi most certainly the first self-proclaimed ‘passionate organizer’ of ‘71 to use those terms.
I suppose the ‘lofty’ titles were only given to those who truly believed in the cause of the war and knew what they were fighting for– beliefs you’ve dismissed as secession and territorial independence.
November 29th, 2007 at 10:54 am
bitterboy : # 25
“I believe in the bondage of humans to humans by love and spirit of humanity, irrespective of race, religion, language, color, nationality and so forth. And’ also, pride in nationality is just devil’s inspiration to serve the purpose of crooked leaders.”
Excellent, cant agree more! ( not only above comment but as a whole )
I wonder why ’some’ people where / went crazy and sacrificed their life for ‘Pure land’ ( Pak-istan some say ) instead of holding centuries old ‘bondage’ with ex-brothers ( Indians some say )!? And poor us, we did the same mistake twice! 1st, we got separated from ‘even more close’ ex-brothers, (2nd) and then NOT reunified with the one that helped us in the process! sh**. Indeed total ‘worthless’ in a way or another.
What about start working on get reunified again! lets start with our ‘immediate’ neighbor, shall we? Hope you are jumping up and down now in your western living room. Or did I picked up the ‘wrong’ neighbor to start with?
Your truthfulness may help yourself if I am wrong in picking I hope.
November 29th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Thank you, Zafar Sobhan for an uplifting essay. There are people who don’t cry for what don’t have but trying to do their best with what they have. Bangladesh has plenty of those people who are happy with what they have and aren’t too concern with grime pictures given by pessimist.
A consolation for bitter boy. My four years old loves candy. No meter how much we tell her that candy is not good for tooth, didn’t work. Once her teacher told her the same what we are saying all along and it worked, even though she struggles some times. We didn’t feel sorry for her not listening to us because we understood that people often don’t value what they have.
November 29th, 2007 at 7:31 pm
Great comment PoorLand (#29). Most of these communal/fundamentalist people often take opportunistic attempt to portray themselves as humanist (see comment from bitterboy in another post). I have seen them preaching stuff almost opposite to their ideology, certainly they themselves don’t believe in such “liberal” view, I guess their target is to cash out when time seems right. But if you are careful and track what they comment over time it does not take long to figure out what sort of humanism they are talking about. Notice that he thinks our war of independence is merely a “war of secession” and the war is fought for some “spurious aspiration and hopes”. I have not seen such outrageous comments for a long time. After this I don’t think there’s anything left to prove for bitterboy, it’s already bitter enough. I understand Bangladesh’s victory over Pakistan must be hurting this bitterguy too much even after 36 years.
November 30th, 2007 at 5:46 am
Journey to Infiinitive/Mr. Tonoy,
Once you commented about me saying perhaps I came out of a Jungle. Then I replied that but I don’t know whether you could believe in me what I ranted then. I don’t know whether you still believe that I’m an inhabitant of deep jungle!
Now you wanted me to give you a proof that I was a very passionate organizer of freedom fight. I believe even if try, you folks won’t believe me becuase many a times you even don’t hesitate to call late Ziaur Rahman as the Pakistani agent infiltrated in the war of liberation. Moreover, whatever I did at that time being compelled to stay inside the country, did for the love of people and the country guided by emotion and passion, not for any title or to claim a share of previlidges of Muktijoddha Quota. That’s why didn’t bother to manage any certificate. If I had that I could send a notarized copy to you to believe what I did.
You won’t believe me. You rather had the suspecion that I might have been an organizer of opposite camp albadar or rajaker. To give you some idea I was, at least, not a rajaker I tell one street-based-political story of mine. It was perhaps, sometimes mid or late February of 1971, just 4-6 weeks after late Sheik Mujib came back home from the jail of Pakistan, I partook in a protest missile against nascent government’s mismanagement. We almost 100-200 students went into Secretariat to see and talk to sheik mujib. As one of the most ethusiasts to go to the new ?king of the country and as I was the most shortest in height I was in the most front of the group. Sheik Mujib came down from second or 3rd floor from his office to us sandwiched, oneside by his political secretary Mr. Tofael and the otherside Late Mr. Abdul Aziz, who was VP of Dhaka college, commander of Dhaka-shohar Muktijoddah and later secretary-general of national muktijoddah sangshad. BTW, Aziz Bhai was one of the most respected student leader and VP of Dhaka College when I was was its student. My heart still sobs when I remember him. And most probably our protest missile was the first protest missle in Dhaka city in Sheik Mujib time. This story I’m telling to make you understand that if I had been a rajaker-organizer I hadn’t that much moral strength and courage to face Sheik Mujib at the almost zero month of independent Bangladesh.
[Irrelevant and distracting points questioning Bangladesh's independence are deleted: admin ]
November 30th, 2007 at 7:09 pm
Bitter Boy ,
I have no wish to spent time with you about some Irrelevant soap opera. I am referring
“you folks won’t believe me becuase many a times you even don’t hesitate to call late Ziaur Rahman as the Pakistani agent infiltrated in the war of liberation.”
Ans: what do you mean by “YOU”? Before accusing some one with such blanket comments, just make sure you have some thing
on the back up of your write up.
Zafar started this thread with other Topic. even I am not agreed with him also in some points.
But way you started to attack personally to
the people by some false statement is enough to show your Identity. By the way Yes I might ask you about your Jungle connection. But I fee right now by asking you I have made a very big mistake. Because people
of Jungle have self respect and they work heard. At least they don’t need to be an attention seeker to attack people personally.
Attention admin I am really sorry to be personal.
Thanks
November 30th, 2007 at 7:52 pm
bitterboy, since you keep bringing up the fact that you were a “teenage organizer” and keep questioning and demanding “proof” of the genocide in Bangladesh, its only fair to ask for proof from you.
So, in that vein, what you should probably provide is names of witnesses who can vouch for you as a “teenage organizer”, places where you “organized”, times when you “organized”. You should also provide the kind of activities you “organized”. Tell us which sector you were in. Tell us who your local leader was, etc.
If its not too much trouble, you could also provide us with a chronology of your activities from December 1970 to December 1971. Make sure to include what you were doing and where you were (corraborating witnesses will be very welcome) on important days such as election day, from 3/1/1971 to 3/25/1971 (3/3/1971, 3/7/1971, etc.), on 3/26/1971, between March and December 1971, on 12/16/1971, etc. Feel free to write a long comment in response - the more detail the better.
It would also be helpful if you tell us a little more about your affiliations at Dhaka College (I am assuming you were a student there based on your previous comment). For example, which groups did you belong to, who were some of the other members of the groups you belonged to, what batch were you in, who were some of your teachers, etc.
I think its the least we can expect from you since you always seem to fall back on your “teenage organizer” days as a crutch. I dont mean to pry, but since you have so much doubt about our history, and place yourself as part of that history, its important for historical accuracy to know exactly what your place in that history is.
November 30th, 2007 at 9:28 pm
ZS’s article is not a literary masterpiece to be dissected for parallelism and allegory. It is an opinion, which I read as, “hey, just do your little part even if you have doubt whether you can pull it off entirely, be assured, you will make a difference in one or two lives.”
With all due respect I find ZS’s asking of personal ID for readers’ little overreaction, even after being personally attacked by ignorance and bigotry. After all, the columnist ZS is in public domain, the person ZS has to swallow the bitterness along with the honey.
Saying that, it is outrageous for anyone to limit the author’s right to quote from any source. It is not a “Quran Sikkhar Asor”, neither is the aim of this thread to discuss relevance of the Holy Quran. I am totally surprised!
Specially, Bitterboy, with a declaration of , “I believe in the bondage of humans to humans by love and spirit of humanity, irrespective of race, religion, language, color, nationality and so forth.”, and then getting all pumped up just by seeing the word “Talmud”? Wondering, did you reach belief of universal human bondage after writing the post #1 or suffering from multiple personality disorder?
I am not even educated enough to understand ‘fugstar’, my Banglish can barely get me through the newspaper. Getting ‘melodramatic’ on this kind of issues has reasons. Look back at ‘cartoon’, Sudan, (and for that matter teaching Theory of Evolution in US schools) and numerous ominous happenings in the name of religion. The more they get away with, the more they try to infringe upon other’s right to live, think, and speak. I guess no one should have any problem if some article is full of Quranic Quotations, reserving the right of agreeing and disagreeing. Why can’t anyone else expect the same tolerance from the zealots? Maybe God is chuckling with his artwork of creating few hypersensitive followers of the Holy Quran. I did not see anyone was trying to provide you insight into Jewish scripture either.
Coming back to the topic, to ZS: I have heard lots of encouraging stories how Bangladeshi expatriates are gathering every little help by organizing themselves and asking for help from fellow human beings at workplaces. As a resilient nation, we have not thrown the towel, not yet! Thanks for this inspiring piece, though, I might have disagreement with some of your other opinions.
December 2nd, 2007 at 6:20 am
SC #35,
I might have multiple personality disorders but among those multiplies, sure enough border-line personality is not inclusive. But too many Bangladeshies have border-line personality disorder, a condition near psychizophrenia, manifested by penchant for staying at the extremes, hellbent not to stay at the middle or to choose the compromised path of moderation. I didn’t say a person can’t quote from anywhere he likes. “Cada cual sue manera” a spanish proverb meaning every one has his or her own taste. A person can be judged by how he dresses, how he eats and how he talks or uses his language.
Mash # 34, I was Dhaka college student of 70’s batch, science group section II and Abdulla Abu Syed and Luftor Rahman of Math were my two best teachers in Dhaka College. I was never did joined in student organization or political parties. Just I observed, supported and acted for the parties of my support unregistered. However, I had good intimacy with Late Abdul Aziz and Obaidul Muktadir Chowdhury, one APS of Sheik Hasina.
I was a mini teen-age organizer. Not many people knew me then and so do I. But the sincerity and passion I worked with in 1970’s election and during the war, can claimed as unique. I had motivated three High-school students, Shafiqul Islam [Kala miah], Abdul Mannan, and Mahbubur Rahman [Mabul] from my village charalahania, under PS Banachharampur, Brahman Baria, to join our liberation war and they went to Agortola and joined the fight in the early month of April. But question why i didn’t go myself? I was compelled to stay inside for home-situation. And so far I know about my recruited FFs, within couple of years of independence they had to flee to Pakistan which they fougth against, for avoiding jails and survival as they were involved in anti-social activities like robberies, muggging etc. This is the greatest irony and stigma on us. Not only them, most of the FFs had to face the similar fate as they were derailed for lack of guidance. Post-independenc government had abject failure to channelize the potential power of FFs to nation building jobs.
Mash, I’m a universal lover and anyone icluding you can come under the umbrella of my love and compassion. But as you think I maybe your enemies or opponent why should I disclose my classified infromantion to you. That’s why I love to live with my psuedonym. But if you want to know my name you will find it in the visitor book of Sheik Mujib Mazar at Tungi Para. And that I visited on mid-1993, recited from the Holy Quran for about 20-30 minutes and prayed for the departed soul of late Sheik Mujib. There, in the visitor book I signed my name and comment. The comment made I parapphrase here, ” all the individuals including the Tokaais who get killed in political meeting or missile are titled as Shaheed[martyrs], why Sheik Mujib who, with his almost whole family got killed but his sychophants doesn’t call him Shaheed or Martyr. Why? Perhaps they have no good faith in Islam or perhaps they think if Sheik Mujib is titled as Shaheed, then his secular role can be little diminished.” If that visitor book is still there or if that comment hasn’t been erased, you will find my name there.
I didn’t have any commander or local leaders but I know the-then 2ICs of area FFs Mr. Mohiuddin Ahamd [later DSP at Rajar bagh], 2IC Mr. Mukleshur Rahman, 2IC Abul Kashem [later custom officer] who hailed from my village. I used to know captain Tajul Islam, currently secretary of Muktijoddha affairs of AWL. You can ask them. Perhaps they can remember me still but not readily. Moreover, you can go and ask the wife of Karjan, once Awami leader of Malibagh, chamelibagh area about me because she is the widow of the greatest, I call “The Number One Shaheed of our liberation war, Mr. Serajul Islam [Shiru miah], OC of Mirpur Thana till 25th March 1971. He was killed with his only son Kamal while going to Agortola. Why I call him the greatest number 1 [one] Shaheed because The Symbolic Number one Rajaker/Albadar head, Golam was once attempted to be sue by Zohra Tajuddin with allegation of killing Shaheed Shiru miah and his son. Shiru Miah was my class-friend’s brother and like my elder brohter. My friend, FF Farid of Homna Thana and me had visited some places together whether we track thier traces but in vain. Mrs shiru miah [later married to Karjon] might still remember me with referece.
I don’t want to linger it. Once again I never denied the genocide. Rather I can be witness. I believe lying is the mother of all sins and maybe I am the man in Bangladeshi community to hate lies most. To me inflating or deflating the fact is a kind of lies and therefore, sin. If we deny the fact it will be injustice to the martyrs and if we do exaggerate the number, will be injustice to the martyrs as it will cheapen them and also to the perpetrators. No body deserves injustice. But I believe in power of love and foregivness.
Thanks.
December 3rd, 2007 at 4:34 pm
Dear Zafar,
I’m extremely sorry and apologize as I
rushingly commented about you just I after reading the quotion, truthfully not even the whole essay. I was little outraged as being muslim we should use our books first. Moreover, my kids were pushing me get out of computer. So, I made hurried remark and later engazed in the debabte with everybody.
But going through the whole write-up I was marvelled by its inward looking beauty, insight and essence. As others commented, it’s a masterpiece.
BTW, I do constantly review I what do and never waste too much time to correct me if I find any error and that’s why I claim myself as a progressive man, I always vouch for fundamental teaching of religions, though.
Thanks evrybody.
December 4th, 2007 at 2:24 am
Bitter boy Just following your long long comments. some times you are Freedom fighter, some times you are organizer. But end of the day you are not comfortable to tell us what your name is ! Bit Funny .why are you so scared. I don’t think CTG , Jamat, BNP or any one will run after you. It does not make any sense while you giving the reference of the people and want us to ask them your pseudo name. I think we are giving Undue honor to respond your messages. - Tanoy Dutta
December 4th, 2007 at 5:34 am
bitterboy in #36, you say “To me inflating or deflating the fact is a kind of lies and therefore, sin.” Yes, I agree that its not good to inflate or deflate facts. So in that spirit I am heartened to see you now use the phrase “mini teen-age organizer” to describe yourself instead of the oft used “teen-age organizer”
Earlier in comment #32 you said, “Moreover, whatever I did at that time being compelled to stay inside the country, did for the love of people and the country guided by emotion and passion, not for any title or to claim a share of previlidges of Muktijoddha Quota. That’s why didn’t bother to manage any certificate.” It however appears from comment #36 that you were not a freedom fighter. So your cheap shot in comment #32 seemed to have inflated your experience at the expense of real freedom fighters. I am glad you have now deflated your claim in comment #36.
I was curious about your activities on those important dates that I cited in my earler comment. Alas, I guess I will wait for it in another comment. I am not so interested in knowing your identity. However, since you often reference your experiences during 1971 your activities during that time seem relevant.
December 5th, 2007 at 1:59 am
Mash,
As if I’m going through a hearing process. I don’t know whether I will be recriminated or rewarded! But I’ll try to answer your queries about the specific dates. But I don’t have any urge to answer anything from Tonnay Dutta because he is kind of… But I can say I’m not scared of any body and at the age of 16 years I could face the father-figure Sheik Mujib inside the secretariat buildiing being in the forefront of protest missile at the very second month of birth of Bangladesh.
About the 1970 election, whence Sheik Mujib
emerged as the undisputed leader of the East of Pakistan: on the election-eve I was in Dhahka college south hostel. I had been watching the TV program about election rules and how the votes can be null and void if the seal is not
properly placed on the intended symbols, if it’s put in between two sypbols or out of
any sympbolic boundary. Then with the
thinking that many votes could be cancelled for this mistakes especially of uneducated untrained women’s votes, I left the hostel to board on motor launch from Sadarghat which left
the station at 12 pm, reached home at about 6 in the morning, made a wooden seal and ballot papers with hand-drawn different symbols, and trained women of at least 100 families before they went to voting center to cast vote. My widow mother who was a only women in the village
with some education was forced by me to be the polling agent of Awami League as she was reluctant to do that as she was very
pardanashin [used to wear borkha and too much of religious minded] woman. I was doing everything possible as if I’m or some family member of mine is the candidate. I understand I
had a sin then as I cast a jal-vote in favor my absentee elder brother in Noaka, I was not a voter at that time, though. That is what I did and believe it was a legendary job at that age.
But what made me so passionate? Two posters really worked through my mind to be so passionate pro-Sheik Mujib: 1) the famous
poster of late Zainul Abedin where a person and a dog had been searhcing for food from the same garbage where there was a dead decomposed cow’s body-parts were stewn all around and the poster language was ” Eay Banglake Bachate Hobe.” and the 2) that a big poster with the caption, Shonar Bangla Shashna Kenou” with some differential statistics btwn the East and West wings.
Now about the dates:
On firt March, at around 11 am to 12 noon, I was at the Dhaka college loby when radio-news aired announcing the postponment of scheduled 3rd March parliamentary assembly. Instanly the pandemonium began. On March, 2, I had joined the historic KolaBhavan Meeting when first time
Bangladesh national flag was hoisted by char-khalifa. So, I was part of the history whereas you folks, many of whom I guess were unborn or little kids.
On March, 3rd I attended the public meeting at Paltan Maidan, addressed by late Sheik Mujib. And that meeting I attended taking part in Lathi missile, with gazari-stick in my hand.
Perhaps, on 4th or 5th March I left my hostel
for my village home where I came from as all ed-institutions were closed sine die. I was for the entire 9 moths in my village being compelled by home-situation and worked as teen-age organizer as I claims, I motivated youths to get trained and join muktibahini, hosting refugees, helping them in temporary make-shift camps, supplying logistics to muktibahinis when they happened to in our areas and so on.
BTW, there was a little unique history of liberation of our area. We got liberated on
24th December, while the whole country got liberated and celebrated it on 16th Decemer. A brigade of Pakistani army of about 250 members
had been figthing to their deaths with thousands of FFs being stucked in isolated pocket until they were rescued by the Indian army to escort to Mainamati. I attended that
grand celebration on Ujanchar launchghat on
24th December, 1971.
Then on 7th or 8th January 1972 I came back to my hostel with one of my recruited FF[ wounded in the fight], Shafiqul Islam [Kala miah] and attended the reception missile and meeting of late Sheik Mujib on the 10th March at Race-course Maidan. This is the very memorable day for me becuase on the same day I had been
disillusioned about Sheik Mujib as I was found him making a big volumnous unpardonable
lie to the nation and that tantamounted to cheating the nation
Thanks.
December 5th, 2007 at 3:32 am
corrigendum:
please read 10th january instead of 10th March, repatriation of day of Late Sheik Mujib.
Thanks
December 5th, 2007 at 5:59 am
bitterboy, thank you for the detailed comment. It clarifies things. I should also add a correction to your comment in #41. You said “About the 1970 election, whence Sheik Mujib emerged as the undisputed leader of the East of Pakistan”. You do realize that the Awami League won an absolute majority in all of Pakistan, not just East Pakistan. It won 167 out of 313 seats in all of Pakistan. It won 167 out 169 seats within East Pakistan. The next nearest party in all of Pakistan won half as many seats as the Awami League. I am surprised that you being so politically active back in 1970/1971 would phrase the above the way you did. Your statement mirrors the rather bizarre position taken by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto - for which he was much ridiculed by the West Pakistani press (prior to March 25 1971).
I am also curious how you became disillusioned the same day Sheikh Mujib returned to Bangladesh on January 10, 1972. It seems a rather curious reaction for a “mini teen-age organizer” after being on the receiving end of a genocide perpetrated by the Pakistani army and its local Razakar forces.
December 5th, 2007 at 11:47 pm
Bitterboy #40
Will you please enlighten us about the big volumnous unpardonable lie that Shiekh Mujib told on 10th January, 1972. I was born some years after 1971 and never got any chance to listen to Mujib’s 10th january speech.
December 6th, 2007 at 2:42 am
Borosha,
You folks, believe me, I may look like little eccentric a screw-ball I’m a steadfast soldier of truthfulness. By Godsake’s I’m not scared to tell the truth whatever is the outcome, though I’m a down to earthman in most senses. In the USA when after 9/11, people started to change their readily muslim idenfying names I reinforced my id by mohammed and my work place I go by name Mohammed. You know, Mohammed’s not a given name to any Bangladeshi people. It’s something extra to identify as muslim. But I love this name because I used to be, in my high-school age, teased by some of our village friends as “Mohammed” due to extra-ordinary meetle to show my truthfulness as a witness a jury about a Hindu-Muslim clash and my witness went against the fellow young students of our village but it saved the hindu family of Shashi Mohan, Shubas, Parimal and so on from sure doom and also did help avertig a local communal riot and perhaps, a sentinel for a national-scale riot at the crucial time of 1968/69’s mass-movement against Ayub/Yahya and when solidified communal unity was an absolute pre-condition for success of anti-military movement.
The above story about me I told to make you believe that I never willingly utter any lies. Rarely I suppressed my some personal information but never a lie for personal gain or to malign anybody. Moreover, I have the stronger love for the people and the country than the leaders. I don’t like to be blind-supporter of any leader. And leaders are human being like everybody of us, quite follible but perhap’s have brighter forehead [lucky] than the rest of the people. I have aversion to worship any leader and think have the right to truthfully critique them.
Sheik Mujib was so beloved leader of mine especially from 1968-69 to 10th January 1972. During the liberation war, perhaps, in the month of September or October , after breaking total 6-month silence about Sheik Mujib, Yahya declared that Sheik Mujib will be put to trial and if found guilty will be hanged. That news came at night as the thunder on my head. And that night how much I cried for Sheik Mujib I can’t make anyone believe unlessed they had seen that.
Now the question is what happened in 10th March or what Sheik Mujib told in that meeting that made me complete U turn about Sheik Mujib. As I said my love for truth, people and country was always far greater than the leaders and still now the same stance I hold.
Being an undersized boy of 15 years I walked about 12-13 miles to attend Sheik Mujib’s 1970’s pre-election campaigning public at Muradnagar Thana, our neighboring thana. Adult people who attended the meeting from our area were walking the long miles but I had to run to pace with them as I was relatively short-sized at that time. Sheik Mujib’s whole complexion, body-motion and part of the speech in that meeting I still vividly remember. He rasing his index finger [Shahadat Aungooli] up directing the sky said, ” Pakistani Shashokgoosti, Panjabi Shashokgoosti, Taader Chatardal Muslim league, Jamate Islam, Nejami Eyshab Protikreashil Chakro Aamar Ebong Awami Leaguer Birodde Ektai Opobad [blame] Deye Bera Je Sheik Mujib Ba Awami Joy-lav Koreley Desh[Pakistan] Tookra Tookra Hoye Jabe. Allah’r Kosam, Sheik Mujib Bicchinnaybadi Noy, Ebong Pakistan’ou Kachupaatar Paani Noy Je Ektu Nara Chara Laagle Pakistan Tookra Tookra Hoey Jaabe.”
Here Sheik Mujib by raising his index finger directing the sky and saying Allah’r Kosam he very emphatically assured the people that he believes in Uninted-Pakistan and what his opposition blame about his feared secessionist’s intention was nothing but propaganda. If one could have collected the public speeches in that election campaign one could find the same rebuttal of Sheik Mujib in all the speeches. If, at that time people had the any suspicion that Sheik Mujib wanted seperation or independenc I doubt he couldn’t have bagged even 10% of popular votes in the erstile East Pakistan. That’s why he desperately tried to refute the secessonist-charge against him.
But to my utter disbelieve, Sheik Mujib in his firt few sentences of his speech on 10th Jan, 1972, bragged that I did dream about Independent Bangladesh since 1948 and we had this happened. Instantly I uttered Naajubillah. If that 10th January speech is true, certainly he had bluffed the nation and not only the people he also used Allah by saying Allahr Kosam and raising index finger up to buy in his lies.
After 36 year’s of research on late Sheik Mujib I don’t have any sure clue about that puzzle. Had he really wanted indendent Bangladesh since 1948 or just he lied to his dearest electorates! If his earlier claim was truthful then he lied at 10th January speech. Whatever statement is true, no one can clean him off his lies.
Thanks.