settled in the foreign land, at last
I am actually feeling like being settled in this foreign land after living here for three and half years now just only from last weekend. i have started saying this to my friends as well. i always see my NRB friends thinking about how to do something more for the country they left years back, never know when they will go back or whether they will go back at all. they try to be part of bangladeshi charities, cultural organisations instead and they religously read bangladeshi newspapers, watch bangladeshi tv news and generally they do blogging, some in bangla some in english with the hope of having some positive impact (i know that’s a relative term, ofcourse!!!) on whatever is happening in their home country.
i never felt interested in doing all these as i always knew i just came here for few years. I know when i’ll go back , everything was very planned for me. actually i sometimes felt pitty for them thinking most of these people even do not know the current bangaldesh very well and they actually are living in a fantasy world thinking they can bring changes from thousands miles away when they even sometimes don’t realise the ground situation in bangladesh is actually not as grave as they are trying to portray in their weekly deshi addas or in their writings.
but for some reason, i needed to wake up as i had been slowly changing to one of them as well for last few months. i could always relate to the political unrest, corruption, blame game in Bangladesh as i grew up with it all my life. i can still very well remember the frustration our leaders caused us. but the prime time of my life, my teen years and the time when i was becoming the individual i am now i have actually seen a very free environment in bangladesh in respect of free media and freedom of speech.Shishir had drawn all his legendary and very political cortoons around this time . he had to have spared no one (at least we didn’t have to know about it).
last week was an eye opener for me in this way.that cartoon incident and dhormeeo onubhuti (hurting religious sentiment) card actually scared the hell out of me. it was not rage, it was not frustration, it was just pure and simple fear of realising not knowing your homeland , where you were born where you grew up. and be sure my friends, this is not the end of it. look at the history of army rule in bangladesh and anywhere else in the world whenever the rulers are not close enough to the people they always tried to be the protector and preacher of the religion of the majority people. so be preapred there will be more incidents like these and bangladesh will be a more unknown country to us. all these ‘dhormio onubhuti’ will take our countries more far away from us.
so after a week of fighting with a very afraid myself , i settled as a declared NRB in a foreign land after all. we will be like those iranians, barmese, arab, somalian people who actually fled from those very oppresive countries of theirs knowing the door they left behind would never be opened for them again nor they would dare to open those doors for themselves ever again. and most of them do not even dream of any betterment of their countries anymore.
so when 20 years old cartoonist arif will be rotting in the prison (i hope he is there , not somewhere more brutal like DGFI blackhole or else) i will be settling better in this all civilised free country. there is a phrase in sankskrit ‘ Jaw Polayoti Shaw Jibotee’ - Je Palay she bache..he who flees, lives…
ohh, and getting really frustared with bangladeshi media over the last weeks, i started reading posts in several bangla and english blogs just to know whether my people are thinking the way local media are portraying or there are people like me as well. and i found this virtual world so truthful so much without hypocricy. specially in bengali blogs i have seen jamatee people making very reactionary comments but other people are calling them jamatee and rajakar and all . but those jamatee bloggers are not trying to hide themselves behind anything. so i decided to start blogging as well just feeling like it as the place to say whatever you feel like to say, to share whatever dream you still have to bring any change.
actually may be it is the place to still feel nostalgic about the country i want to go back so much.may be it is the place just to do some bloggorbloggor (i loved this word i found in one bangla blog)to get the heat out. after all ‘palabey Kothay’ ??? where can you hide ?how far you can go??
September 28th, 2007 at 8:19 am
….well, let me be the first to welcome you to the dark side then! Blogs are where it’s at right now.
I have no idea about your age, but for an entire generation of Bangladeshis inside and outside, summer 2007 might just have been a sad life-changing experience. We’ll just have to wait and see. We’ve been through so much already, I feel it’s premature to give up just yet (or ever).
September 28th, 2007 at 11:54 am
A kinda silly poem that offers no answer.
Ate a little food yesterday
just about nothing today
hungry and in despair
I went to the committee
they offered me a chair
Gave me a glass of water
Asked me politely to return next year
Free food every tomorrow
Maybe even yesterday
just not today, not today.
September 29th, 2007 at 4:51 am
Muhammed (SM) is a very scared name to all muslims. Cant we leave Him above the cartoon? We have many issue to attend.
One more thing. The editors and the religious leader have come to a consensus to Let-us-forget-it. It is some handful people those who did not like the cartoon simply protested and it is their democratic right. Don’t brand the whole country by seeing the Baitul Mokarrom on Friday.
We are so unfortunate that we USE our country.
We try to justify our escape saying that the country is not worth living.
We have no where to go. No relatives abroad to sponsor. No money/ no brain.
We have only one destination- Bangladesh; Good or bad, like it or dislike it.
DJ
September 29th, 2007 at 11:40 am
#3: “sacred” you mean, I guess.
September 29th, 2007 at 8:35 pm
#3, what has your comment to do with the blog post anyway?
Fine, today we decide to take his name off “cartoons” because they are not sacred enough.
Tomorrow, suppose we take his name off all internet sites, because the internet is not.
The day after we take his name off all printed material because it is not sacred enough.
The day after we stop mentioning his name because for the rest of the day we’ve used our mouths to swear, gossip, villify and lie.
Where does it stop? And who gets to decide whether a cartoon or the internet or a book or our spoken word is the appropriately sacred medium for me to express my respect for the Prophet (SW)? I’m seriously asking, who?
September 30th, 2007 at 1:02 am
To me, the answer to “who” is clear in Dale Netherton’s(poet and a writer)last year article in the “American Chronicle”.
” From reason came the concept of individual rights and the sacred notion of the right to life. When this concept was recognized in law, man was free to act but not free to compel. With the separation of church and state came the edict that one could worship but could not compel others to believe. This was the beginning of a civilization that considered an individual’s life more sacred than ancient writings and beliefs that could not be questioned.
If religious law is to be supreme …..If there is disagreement,.. then those who believe they have been wronged can point to a scripture, formulate an accusation and violence emerges. Interpretation of the law becomes the provence of those in power. There are no appeals to those who have cited the dictates they ascribe to. This is why the law must not be ignorant of precedent, reason and justice. It is not enough to merely ascribe a modifier such as social, or Muslim or Jewish, etc. Justice must be blind to all such beliefs and deal with the law as created by reason which leads to the recognition and protection of individual human lives. For what else do we need governing bodies for, if not to protect us? “
October 1st, 2007 at 5:42 am
AsifY,
There are so many supposes!
I just simply said that making fun on his name hurts many people those who donot have slightest chance to express their feelings.
Muslims are remembering Muhmmed (SM) for last 1500 yrs.
These cartoons, internet probably can not change the history.
Who to decide? it is your subconscious mind.
We have MUA/FUA/RMG/EC/ACC/PSC/Silicon Vally/NRB/DGFI and what not.
October 1st, 2007 at 7:18 am
Rajkumari,
There is a rich tradition of retreating/fleeing/going away to live for another day in the Islamic civilisation. The Prophet himself left Mecca to consolidate the faith. Classical scholars of Islamic political thought suggests that it’s better to go away and keep the message alive rather than to stay and be wiped out by the enemy. So you’re in good company as long as you keep the message alive. And as AsifY says, blogs are where it’s at now. Blog-e blog-e durgo gore tolo.
October 1st, 2007 at 8:04 am
Dhumrojaal bhai/apa,
Those are not mere “supposes” but simply the logical next consecutive steps following from your original argument that cartoons are somehow a not-good-enough medium to carry the Prophet (SW)’s name or to have any discussion on religion.
I clearly say that if you stop people from TALKING ABOUT him in one medium , you set a precedence which can be used to stop people from talking about him in other mediums: print, internet, word-of-mouth etc. This was in response to your original statement that the name must be “kept above cartoons”.
Nowhere do I even suggest that these mediums will carry ONLY critical views of him or try to wipe away his memories. How you made the jump from one to the other is beyond me.
Therefore, I don’t quite see where this fits in to the question I posed to you: “Muslims are remembering Muhmmed (SM) for last 1500 yrs.
These cartoons, internet probably can not change the history.” What history has been changed by Mr Arifur Rahman’s cartoon? I had no idea he was dealing with history and not the present!
October 3rd, 2007 at 10:40 pm
About a year ago, in a small town in Bangladesh, in a tea shop, In an adda atmosphere, I casualy mentioned why do we have to say ” peace be upon him” when we mention Muhammad”s name. Why would the top guy in islam need our token “peace be upon him”. I don’t see
any point. If anything we ( Sinners) need it more than him.
I merely escaped bodily harm that night.
Perhaps God understood my point. I am sure Him (Her) or Muhammad needs no sucking up. Or do they?
October 4th, 2007 at 3:03 am
Masroor - the PBUH expression most likely originated as a prayer, to protect the Prophet from constant attacks and raids he endured while spreading the religion.
It’s use remained as a tradition.
October 4th, 2007 at 11:59 am
Thank you for explaining the possible origin of the tradition. I wonder why Jewish religion use the same expression also ( for their top dogs).
If God was my buddy why would I care for the prayers of mere mortals…but thats another story.
My point is how tradition becomes an unquestionable way of life,which, we often like to call “sacred”.
They surely often give us comfort when there is not much else, like reading a favorite fairy tale. But please, don’t force me (not you, personally) to call them “sacred”.
October 4th, 2007 at 1:01 pm
Offering peace and blessings upon the Prophet of Islam(saws) is an integral part of the muslim ritual prayer. Try to remember the end passages of the even numbered rakats. That would suggest that the practice is an original and contunued Islamic one from the first generation.
For the textually curious, there is quranic direction and plenty of authentically benchmarked hadith recommending it.
verse 56 of Surat Al-Ahzab: “Lo! Allah and His angels shower blessings on the Prophet. O ye who believe! Ask blessings on him and salute him with a worthy salutation.”
In sahih muslim there’s “For one who sends blessings upon me once, Allah will send tenfold blessings in return”.
Here is a link if you permit. Hope it answers the question.
http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/salawat.htm
October 4th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Thank you, fugstar. All I can say is “to each his own”.
October 4th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
All I can say is “to you your own”