Tue 21 Aug 2007
Student anger again rocks Dhaka university campus and is spreading to other campuses. The rage, this time, is against the member of nations’ defence forces camped in Dhaka university gymnasium. A trivial soccer field brawl started this episode of student unrest. While a heated debate goes on at the previous thread, not very surprisingly, there are quite a few voices against this student movement in favor of the military occupation of Dhaka University. This is in sharp contrast to the overwhelming public support any student movement used to enjoy in this part of the world. Anyway, this movement begins at a time, when people started asking whether the once famous student power, the uncontrollable force of collective rage, is still alive and waiting to be awaken. Although the events of last night definitely answered the query– question remains whether this major student protest would have any impact to the political scene of Bangladesh.
We have to remember that this is simply an outburst of anger against a local problem, i.e. the army camp or merely a petty problem i.e. the student-soldier altercation over a soccer match. This is no way comparable to the student’s nationalistic or pro-democracy movements of 69, 71 or 84-90. The same stuidents who are protesting today, did also protest against the police atrocity in Shamsunnahar hall or mass rape in JU. However, in between these events, students remained carefully detached from more pressing national or civic issues or from the calls of national political leadership. Even in very recent past, when an army camp was set up at DU gymnasium, there was not a single word of protest against it. The violent protests of October/November and even of 1996 didn’t see student participation. So I remain skeptical of the immediate future of this movement to become an allout antigovernment agitation.
However, despite the intention and the cause, this student protest sends a very strong signal. This is the first time, at this term, military forces were again made aware of a formidable force, which is not scared of them. In recent Bangladesh, in both military and civil circles, militray officers were near God. The events last night, when a CGS MAj Gen Jamali was chased at DMCH, or when another all powerful Brig general was physically assaulted ( By no means an accerptable form of protest), would make the defence forces look more mortal in public eyes. The fear tactic will be less effective from now on. An unease will start taking shape in civil-military intercations. Even of this unrest is contained quite quickly, it is certain that in the near future, more such unrest will loom in different sectors, including farmers demanding seed/fertlizer, workers demanding salary, students protesting other issues. And more importantly, as blogger Jyoti asks, how many of such unrest can this CTG withstand?
August 21st, 2007 at 11:29 am
There was a lot of hope and goodwill riding on the CTG but already that seems a long time ago. The minimum expectation from them was one of basic competence. But in their dismal handling of bread-and-butter economic issues, they have already proved that they are almost as incompetent as anyone else. Even if the CTG head IS a World Bank economist. I wonder if the military is interfering in economic policymaking, because surely Fakhru must know better than that?
Anyway, with support already diminishing, Incompetence has just been joined by Oppression. This is a lethal cocktail, and as much as one hates to see public property burning, etc, the CTG surely must know that out of the Dhaka University campus has emerged some of the most powerful, paradigm-changing revolutions in the history of Bangladesh. Already the conflagration has spread to Jahangirnagar and Chittagong. The CTG would do well to take stock and take a step back at this point.
*
And right on queue, it’s on the BBC front page:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6956567.stm
August 21st, 2007 at 12:28 pm
The same stuidents who are protesting today, did also protest against the police atrocity in Shamsunnahar hall or mass rape in JU.
And you surely have a source for that statement, don’t you. From what I remember, the mass rape in JU was committed by students!
August 21st, 2007 at 12:35 pm
Sid,
I am sorry to say this as Mash said its no time to be flippant like this. We are all worried sick here and what you are doing here is “torker khatire torko” with your limited knowledge on Bangladeshi student politics.
JU incidents were committed a by cadre from Chatro league and the general students stood up against it. I don’t call the cadres students because they are not. Please do the differentiation between cadres (2%)and general students (98%).
August 21st, 2007 at 12:42 pm
I’m sorry, but who is being flippant?
You are the one who always demands a web link or an online source for any statement that goes against your opinion of events. So it is perfectly fair to ask for an online resource from you about the factual correlation of Student demonstrators being the exact same as those who demo’ed in Shamsunnahar.
Also, it is absolutely correct to say that the JU mass rape campaign was carried out by student cadres.
August 21st, 2007 at 12:52 pm
Okay, this is my last post and you can have the last word:
1. JU rape incident and Shamsunnahar hall incident and the involvement of general students is of common knowledge and got wide media publicity at the time it happened. There were no arms displayed in those movements. The force was on pure numbers and mobilization. I personally know quite a few who are otherwise passive but were involved in it.
2. Students throwing bombs at army and carrying AK47 at yesterday’s event is a new information and that’s why I wanted the news link. It turns out you were just saying those things casually.
I will leave it to the readers on who is being flippant.
August 21st, 2007 at 12:57 pm
I’m uncomfortable with granting amnesty to the crimes of any perpetrator simply because they happen to take on the bogeyman of the Army. Student cadre politics is a serious malaise of Bangladeshi society which forces thousands of our youngsters to flock to foreign shores to get a halfway decent education.
August 21st, 2007 at 1:02 pm
Sid (2),
Your argument is like saying ‘9/11 bombers were Muslim’ when someone argues that Muslims in general don’t support suicide bombing.
August 21st, 2007 at 1:05 pm
Jyoti, you are like those Muslims who extend passive, sentimental support to Islamists simply because they have beards and wear topis. Another word for this is tribalism.
August 21st, 2007 at 1:15 pm
Rumi bhai: students protested against JU rapists.
Sid: JU rapists were students.
I draw an analogy. Sid, you don’t see the analogy and make an assertion about me. I’ve been accused of a closet Jamaati and an Indian agent in the blogosphere, but passive Muslim tribalist is a first. I’m following AsifS and letting you have the last word.
August 21st, 2007 at 1:26 pm
Jyoti, don’t take everything so literally. I accept cadres are not the prime drivers of this insurgency, but they are the appeles that have poisoned the barrel, so to speak.
Thank you for giving me the last word, but I think you deserve it more than me.
August 21st, 2007 at 2:19 pm
I was a faculty of JU at the time when all this happened and my wife was a student. So I have seen all these unfold in front of me. My wife was one of the students who organized the protests. The most attractive fact about the protests was that it was not organized by any student political party or lead by the known student leaders. It was the general students who organized themselves and sort of formed an action committee.
And for the rapist….He was one of those goons who switched parties as needed. He used to claim to be a part of JCD before 1996. In 1996, when AL came to power, he switched to BCL. However, I don’t think of him as part of either party because I don’t think he had any allegiance to either party. He just used the parties to enjoy some sort of “power” on campus.
August 21st, 2007 at 3:56 pm
I’m somewhat confused about a small and irrelevant point in the BBC article: Zia’s government was not brought down by student protests but by a bloody assassination as far as I know. While students=democracy and army=autocracy and never the twain shall meet might sound good to BBC’s worldview, distortion of facts to fit the thesis is simply sad. I welcome being corrected.
Is this the same Sid from Golmal/Pickled Politics? Are we sure his account hasn’t been hijacked?
August 21st, 2007 at 4:17 pm
Is this the same Sid from Golmal/Pickled Politics? Are we sure his account hasn’t been hijacked?
The very same. No chance of this account being hijacked. I have never gone along with the flabby liberal sentiment which, not unlike the BBC reportage you linked to, regard this “student” uprising as A GOOD THING simply because it is equated, unproven and irrational as it happens, with the voice and sentiment of the people, simply because the object of their ire is the Army, which in all cases, and mostly by our lick-spittle intelligentsia is equated to A BAD THING.
Excuse my long sentence, but Mutual Exclusion and Absolutes like Army=Bad and Students=Good make me queasy.
August 21st, 2007 at 4:32 pm
Well they make me quesy too Sid, which is why I brought up the Zia-point in the BBC article. It’s really easy for “lick spittle intelligentsia” to overlook facts to fit their thesis.
I asked if this was you because the ad hominem attack on Jyoti is really unlike you, as is your almost blind inability to see that there are some merits behind the reasons, though not the methods, of the students’ protests. Most of your comments on this seem to be based on the absolute of students = cadres. Two absolutes don’t make a right… or something like that.
Look its an emotional time for all of us, but lets try keep calm eh?
August 21st, 2007 at 5:01 pm
I find it puzzling that my posts are regarded as ad-hominem on Jyoti. He passed an analogy, I passed counter-analogy. Why mine should be taken so literally and an ad-hominem, I dunno. Apologies to Jyoti if this was misunderstood by him as well.
And believe me, I’m very calm, but I’ll take the fact that my writing comes across with a forceful empathy as a compliment.
I don’t regard this student uprising as a force for good. I’m sorry but that’s my view. I would like to see the cadre numbnuts squashed into ground and proper social values being instilled into our student bodies, but then I’m old-fashioned like that.
And finally, and I will make this final I promise, here is a link to an article which shows that the rapist(s) at Jahangir Nagar University were Chatra Dal Leader. Students eh? Don’t you just love ‘em.
August 21st, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Well Sid, you said “You are” to Jyoti’s “Your argument is”. Understandably it sounded ad hominem to a lot of people.
I want a better student culture at DU and public universities myself. But if you think that it can be “instilled” through powerful figures in government (be they politicians, bureaucrats, the police and/or the military), then I’m sorry to say you’re utterly mistaken. In your scheme, you are simply replacing politicians’ dirty incentives with police coercion.
I’d rather see DU well funded, PRIVATISED (gasp) and teachers and administrators protecting these students from outside forces, which in the end give rise to cadres. After that, if anyone still acts with the same impunity that cadres do, then by all means apply the law, kick those goons out and get on with it.
A campus is a place to think for oneself, not a place where thoughts have to be tear-gassed /instilled forcibly is my point. Call me a dreamer.
August 22nd, 2007 at 5:00 am
AsifY, re #16 - last 2 paras:
What saddens me most is how incapacitated our LAW ENFORCEMENT is in BD, that the vandalism of just 20 cars is enough to send them tail-gating out? pleading mercy to the perpetrators, instead of carrying them away handcuffed.
It demonstrates how incompetent our govt law enforcement really is. In 36 years after liberation, we have not been able to grasp how to deal with vandalism, hooliganism and anarchy.
It is a sorry state of affairs, that the Bangladesh army has been literally KICKED out of DU by a bunch of hooligans??
[The ARMY have done the politically-correct move to vacate DU for now, but for the sake of ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE, with the right campus environment, DU has a long way to go].
The students have basically TESTED the strength of the army/CTG, and what they have discovered is that (like a childs tantrum) they only need a few vandalized cars to get their end accomplished. Session jams, cadres, bomabaji, cheating, hartals can now RESUME freely once again in the DU, because the govt have shown their tails, and the army is not watching!
If you cannot “kick those goons out” NOW, how can you kick em out after privatization of DU?
August 22nd, 2007 at 8:04 am
KGazi bhai,
It saddens me too to see the state of our law enforcement, by which I mean the police. The army isn’t there for enforcing the law inside the country, but to protect it from external threats.
I think the fact that some armed forces personnel would humiliate a TEACHER (surely the most respected profession in the country, or ought to be!) also reflects badly on them too! Getting “hotaoed” off campus by students really pales in comparison.
Re you question, I’m glad you asked. Please tell me why you think NOW is the time to kick out the goons? How can we trust any government not to show favouritism towards the students who support it, let alone one that has favoured corrupts like Mannan Bhuiya in a fight against corruption?
Rather, I’d like to see privatisation that puts the power firmly back into the hands of an independent DU administration elected and run by its faculty members. THEN, if a student is expelled, or the police called in, or even an army camp set up inside, we know that DU itself took those decisions in what it judges to be its own interest. Rather than having government take stupid actions that lead to tragedies like this.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Has anybody watched the BBC UK report at 8 PM BST? When they were showing the riots on the streets of Dhaka, none of the rioters were students! The British reporter said that rumors are circulating that rampant rioters on the streets early on in the evening weren’t students.