Thu 28 Jun 2007

The much talked about reform proposal has arrived in BNP. While the proposal calling for joint leadership looks really good in paper, the people who it is coming from are a bit problematic. The proposal came from none other than Abdul Mannan Bhuia, the current sec General of BNP. If you didn’t know any better, I wouldn’t blame you if you had thought that secretary was just appointed in the party. However, this very same person was the secretary for the last 5 years — supposedly the years of massive corruption and family dynasty done under the name of his party. What was his role during that time?
If you recell, Oct 27th, 2006, a group of BNP leaders left the party with exactly the same accusation and formed a new party called LDP. At that time, the very next day their houses were attacked, their cars were torched by the BNP goons. What was Mannan Bhuiya’s role during that time ? He said that if a few people leave BNP, it doesn’t hurt the party. In effect, Bhuiya alligned himself perfectly with the people whom he is calling corrupt today in spite of that open revolt inside the party.
The proposal castigates the people responsible for the debacle of the party and wants Khaleda Zia leadership to take responsibility of the corruption inside the party. Now common sense suggests that both the number 1 and number 2 should equally be held accountable for it.
Now why is it problematic about who the proposal is coming from ?
There is a notion of opportunitism in the whole process. If Abdul Mannan B. becomes the chairperson in the new BNP, this would be awarding opportunism at the cost of accountibility. Bangladesh never had shortage of good laws and guides. The problem was never with the law but the implementation of the law. As Zafar Sobhan briliantly points out that our problem was much deeper than we would like to think. Will it really change anything if we just replace one set of corrupt politician with another new set?
Mannan Bhuiya now is calling that the previous administration was corrupt. But none of us forgot the venom he showed when Transparency International accused his ministry to be one of the most corrupt ones.
Here was the exact quote as was covered in the blog then.
Dismissing the report LGRD Minister Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan said, “We rejected the report with hatred…this a politically motivated report to tarnish the images of the government and the country.”
“Actually, they prepared the report to encourage the corruption… they wanted to see the country as a failed state…the people who work in the very organisation actually wanted to make their fortune only”, he added. He said, “We never had confidence on the TIB report.”
Raising question of the authenticity of the TIB report, the Law Minister Moudud Ahmed reiterated that the TIB prepared the report to tarnish the images of the country. “We neither give importance nor recognise the TIB report,” he added.
Echoing the same view, Health Minister Khandaker Mosharraf Hossain said, “We don’t know the source of the money by which the organisation is running.”
Out of the three who said that corruption was an imaginary apple by TIB, two are now in jail and one that has the jail free pass is now calling for “reform”. Too bad it isn’t self reformation.
Now the big question is whether Bhuiya Shaheb is still thinking the current CTG also is harming the image of our country. Hail to the reformer-in-chief!
But what would be the outcome of this initiative? As fellow blogger Asif Y aptly puts it:
“At best, this current revolt might just transform it into a REAL party. At worst, it will break it into pieces, not much of a loss. ”

June 28th, 2007 at 3:35 pm
You have asked some really hard-hitting questions. I wonder if anyone, preferably from the BNP fold would try answering them.
Ideally, we should have a TV program like Tim Russert’s “Meet the press” where Bhuyian would be an invited guest and would be asked to respond to his own published statements - like those that you have quoted here.
Trityo Matra is interesting but Zillur Rahman should have more control on the proceedings and he should be prepared to ask real hard questions, substantiated with published statements or TV clippings.
The bottom line is, there can be no reforms with people like Mannan Bhiyian still at the helm. We need new blood, that is still untainted by greed and corruption.
June 28th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
“this a politically motivated report to tarnish the images of the government and the country.”
I dont disagree with that. When your opposition does not accept/respect your election win it must foggy the mind.
the who and the how and the why behind delivering research reports matters a lot in this society, much more than the content.
June 28th, 2007 at 3:52 pm
Asif bhai,
Either ways, I am happy. Let me tell you why. These politicians have had always divided us in two to three categories and rule our beloved Bangladesh as a Kingship state. The very same politicians who were dining and winning together and also used to go to the Guest House of Gulshan and motels for self physical pleasure are now divided.
Divide and rule. The divide and rule formula in subcontinent came as the most deadly weapon of destructions. The British divided us in Hindu-Muslim.Partition was welcomed, than the break down of east and west with fueling from same divide and rule formala.
I am very happy. I want to fuel more ignition to this divide and rule tactics. We have to break their internal power and unity. Because too much strenght in one body always bring destruction.
Same to AWL. Let it break, let the unitly be weak. Then what will come out would be the people who really want to make a differences.
150 million peoples country,it looks funny that we can’t think a political party with out a 150 most corrupt person of the country. Why it should be so hard? why can’t we bring the change which we all envisioned? the vision of new leadership.
This time people of Bangladesh really giving thanks to the divide and rule tactics.One time assets becomes one times liability. Onetime liability becomes one times asset. That what had happen to us in Bangladesh with divide and rule formala. They politicians always divided us in AWL and BNP and Jamaat and Jatio Party now it be our turn to divide them and break the corruption and political nexust in the pieces.
thanks
Kawser Jamal
http://www.changeBangladesh.com
June 28th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
There is no question that Bhuiyan deserves his share of the blame, as pointed out by Asif. For that matter, one is hard-pressed to find any one in the senior leadership who is either not directly or indirectly involved in the massive corruption in the last BNP era.
An argument can be made that whole scale action against BNP top layer leadership will decapitate the entire party and leave a political vacuum as an unintended consequence. This may be more harmful to the country in the long run. This kind of pragmatic thinking may be the reason why Bhuiyan remains unscathed in the current anti-corruption drive. (Perhaps, similar comments apply to some AL leaders as well).
On the otherhand, selective prosecution, sometimes of lesser fries, makes the process seem unfair. With changes in the political wind, those currently in trouble with corruption charges may wear political victim label enmasse quite effectively and escape long term disgrace in the public eye. If this were to happen, all the positive effects of the current anti-corruption drive will have dissipated.
June 28th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
Thank you Asif for your nice blog. I do like to share some information of Mannan Bhuiyan which I gather from some BNP activist and Internet.
POLITICAL BACKGROUND
Mannan Bhuiyan contest in national parliament election in the year 1979 from United Peoples Party (UPP) and lost the election, where BNP candidate win in the election. Mannan Bhuiyan joined BNP in 1988. He had no significant role in anti Ershad movement. At that time UPP leader Kazi Zafor Ahmed (popularly know as Chini Zafor) was PM of Ershad government.
In 1991 election Mannan Bhuiyan got nomination from BNP and win. After death of BNP Secretary General Abdus Salam Talukdar, Khaleda Zia nominated Mannan Bhuiyan as new Secretary General in the year 1997.
2001-2006
Mannan Bhuiyan start to consolidate his power within the party and government from 2001. At that time BNP leaders were divided in two groups, Mannan Bhuiyan and Dr. Mosharraf group. Though Mannan Bhuiyan group controlled alternative power centre Hawa Bhaban, Saifur group became weaker. In 2002, there was a speculation that BNP may change its Secretary General. At that time Mannan Bhuiyan and his man Haris Chowdhury convinced Tarique Rahman to take the position of Joint Secretary General. By this trap Mannan Bhuiyan confirmed his position.
Being Secretary General of BNP, he controlled the party. His man Haris Chowdhury and Dr. Kamal Siddiqi controlled the decision of PMO. He also controlled the home ministry after Lutfuzzaman Babar got the full charge. Mannan Bhuiyan influenced in the decision making of Hawa Bhaban through his group member Haris Chowdhury, Lutfuzzaman Babar, Ehsanul Huq Milon, Zahiruddin Shawpan and Mofiqul Islam Tripty. That’s why Mannan Bhuiyan was the most influential person in the government. He can do anything which he wants at that time. ANH Akhtar Hossain, a close associate of Mannan Bhuiyan became Secretary from a non cadre post of Deputy Secretary level. At that time all major decision was made either by him or with the consultation with him. When PM stayed outside the country, he was in charge. In last 5 years leaders of Dr. Mosharraf group was sideline in PMO, Hawa Bhaban and Party office. Most of the leaders of Dr. Mosharraf group now in jail.
CORRUPTION ALLEGATION
LGED ministry was one of the most corrupt ministries in last 5 years, where Mannan Bhuiyan was in charge. He did illegal transaction through his APS Shahin. Milk Vita became sick for his corruption. LGED adviser Anwarul Iqbal reveals a part of that
http://www.ajkerkagoj.com/2007/June28/1st_page.html#12
Mannan Bhuiyan was live in a small government quarter of his wife, Baily Dump, from 1986-1990. After 1991, his lifestyle changed. Now he lives in a Luxury NAM flat at Gulshan, which bought. He also bought a Luxury flat at BEVERLY PARK, Plot # 4B, Road # 55, Gulshan 2. He also sends his son abroad for study. Mannan Bhuiyan maintain 3 cars including a 4000 cc brand new Jeep.
NEW MIR ZAFOR
Most of the BNP activist now called him as new Mir Zafor. Everyday, we saw in TV channels, identified corrupt leaders are visiting his house. When many political leaders detained without any trial, but ex MP Abul Hossain Khan visiting Mannan Bhuiyan’s house everyday. Abul Hossain Khan convicted by a court for an arms case. Instead of 7 years imprisonment, surprisingly he got bail. Corrupt minister Rezaul Karim and Ehsanul Huq Milon also vocal in favour of him.
An interesting article was published by Amar Desh about contradictory statement of Mannan Bhuiyan
http://www.amardeshbd.com/detail_news_index.php?NewsID=117641&NewsType=bistarito&SectionID=home&oldIssueID=2007/06/26
June 28th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
Abdul Manna Bhuiyan may form BNP [Abdul].
But that will surely flop like Bikollpa or LDP by Mannan Bhuiyan’s father-figures like B. chowdhury or Oli. Mannan Bhuiyan joined BNP in 1987, a relative neophyte but B. chowdhury was founder secretary and the Oli was the close associate of Zia from the very zero hour.
While the father-figurs funked, ABDUL will see a grand success is
a wistful thinking.
BNP [abdul] is very much doable with the baciking of the pro-reformist CTG but it won’t be workable.
Only doable, workable and sustainable reform can be done by banning 4 major parties BNP, AWL, JP and JI.
No other steps will be workable and permanent. If my suggested steps aren’t taken, we will see the same family-ghost on our head and we will one day see Rehana, Joy or Tarique, Zobaida or Jaima, Shad or Erik or someother will be our steer or cheer leaders through their inherited parties.
June 28th, 2007 at 8:50 pm
I see a master plan of the military-backed interim government (MIG) is being implemented step by step by many different players toward the so called ultimate goal of the MIG of giving back politics to the hands of the relatively honest and competent people of the country. In that light Mannan B and the likes appear to me rather a pawn in this nasty game of power called politics than real reformists.
We may remind ourselves that Mannan B is none but a sample of the same stock of politicians - many of whom are languishing in the jail now. The only reason of keeping him outside the jail appears to utilize him and the likes in getting the so called minus-2 theory implemented apparently through democratic means.
It will be interesting to see what happens to all of the so called top-tier reformists of both BNP and AL once the minus-2 theory become a reality. My gut feeling is that because of their ‘nice’ service, many of them may not be ended up in the jail but their political careers will be pretty much done by that time frame.
June 28th, 2007 at 10:11 pm
Fugstar,
“the who and the how and the why behind delivering research reports matters a lot in this society, much more than the content”
“Who” should we trust? And how are we to ascertain the “why”s in a person’s head? “How” is a question of methodology, and therefore valid. I personally have been a critic of TI’s corruption PERCEPTION index. I don’t know if this report was there too.
Also, if TIB ever criticises AL corruption, would you say the same thing?
June 29th, 2007 at 1:25 am
More on the rise and role of the Brutus of BNP, Mr Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan in this, this and this blogs.
June 29th, 2007 at 2:05 am
Everybody can easily imagine if the so called reformist of BNP and AL going to grass root level wit a proposal against Khaleda Zia and Sheikh Hasina. We saw how cruel of the people of this country, in 1990.
ABDUL may be temporarily successful and get government favour. We read in internet the trio, ABDUL Mannan Bhuiyan, Khoka and Babar met every night separately in last couple of months. The signature campaign organizer Babar in jail now, we are waiting to see when hijacker turns mayor Khoka deposited his ill gotten 3,000 crores Taka to Treasury. If ABDUL will not arrest, any citizen can go to high court with a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
Mnnan Bhuiyan successfully manages some of the media people (including Prothom Alo and Daily Star) like Babar. His son married to daughter of Sheikh Kabir Hossain (paternal uncle of Sheikh Hasina). That’s why he got some favour from media and AL.
ABDUL’s wife became principal of Dhaka College by misuse of power. How his APS Shahin untouched, who made crores of Taka in last 5 years.
Somebody alleged that ABDUL bought a luxury flat at Beverly Park, Plot # 4B, Road # 55, Gulshan with the money from AL leader HBM Iqbal.
June 29th, 2007 at 3:59 am
I’m baffled thinking who is right ABDUl MB or Prof. Muzaffar of TIB. The later said in his report that the LRGD ministry under the boss-ship of Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan was the most corrupt ministry. Many big shot like Barrister Nazmul Huda, Khondker Musharraf etc were arrested immediately after the anti-corruption drive of CTG. But after 6 months of CTG/PIG [para-military interim government] who are so aggrssive to go after corrupt politicians, Abdul MB is left totally untouched. Even he didn’t have to submit the account of his property. Moreover, he has been patronized to take the helm of reform movement. It seems as if he is the the holiest politician of the country.
If that’s true, Prof Muzaffar of TIB should be brought to book for his humongous disservice to the nation for his TIB reporting years after years stigmatizing us as the world’s most corrupt nation.
The onerous burden lies on the our current divinely bestowed government to prove who is right ABDUL MB or Prof. Ahmed. At least one of them are guilty and it should be probed and the guilty should be punished with exaplary punishment. Otherwise, the honesty and neutrality of the government would be questioned.
Thanks.
June 29th, 2007 at 6:39 am
Our political parties behave like criminal gangs who will stop at nothing to create benefits for their members. I recently wrote an article about this: http://thedailystar.ws/forum/2007/june/loyal.htm
It seems to me that our democracy will not work any differently until we have institutions which are empowered to police the behaviour of political parties. Right now the only such institution is the military. Before we return to civilian government, we need to create equally strong civilian institutions. Any ideas?
Zahin
June 29th, 2007 at 7:08 am
#8 If TI criticises AL wouldnt i say the same thing?
Looking back on the 96-01 period i was less bangladesh focussed in my study and being so such a study wouldnt have caught my eye. What did catch my eye was a (now deceased) foreign minister making a mess on a visit to london.
During the first AL period, if i were a uni student i would probably be trying to avoid being killed by people who would misinterpret my reading habits.
I would always be interested in the ‘how the heck did you come up with that finding?’ and what is your niyyat question. And i would be wary of the manufactured civil society and the native informant alleged intelligensia. Id also encourage systematic study of the fools, because it is they as well as the corrupt that keep this country a swampy backwater.
Perception is such a duff measure in a country like bangladesh, where the cheif advisor faints and vast tracts of the people beleive he has died for some time.
During a hypothetical AL regime my specific concerns would be about sovereignty, secular overindulgence, employment, education, religious education and justice.
Corruption of the mind soul and body of the ruling class is a given right? inshAllah in future it will be less so.
June 29th, 2007 at 7:25 am
Well Fugstar, I was asking about a potential, future AL government. Unlike you, I do not think that “corruption” is anyone’s given right. I know where you’re coming from, and I’m not a BCL “cadre” out to get you from your reading habits, but is that what your knowledge really says? That corruption among the ruling elite should go unchallenged because of some weird neo-Muslim belief that such a challenge is essentially “fitna” for lack of a better word? Really?
Ahh… a manufactured civil society. This is the second time I’ve come across this from you. What’s manufactured about it? And if cultural authenticity is really so important to you, why not go back to pre-Islamic modes of Bengali thinking?
Native informant? In this day and age, we’re all Native Informants to one extent or another. Yet another gloriously vague term I’m afraid. Look, all this is not new. This may have been true of the 70s and 80s intellectuals in BD, but trust me, the 90s and the 2000s saw people who are as aware of these arguments against Western models as you are. Give them a bit more credit. True, maybe they don’t have a Qawmi degree, but they know something worthwhile:).
June 29th, 2007 at 7:37 am
And lastly Fugstar, my question still remains: what is a valid way of ascertaining someone’s “niyyat”/”why” they research what they do?
June 29th, 2007 at 2:16 pm
comma! IMAGINE THERE WAS A COMMA,
then it would read like..
‘corruption is a given, right!’
On that issue i have written about the late husain alatas and his sociology of corruption in my blog.
Finding out the niyyat.
1)Scrutinising the social processes behind the funding for the alleged science
2)Asking them and squeezing their brains!
3)Reading the work critically, what are they interested in and who are they addressing.
4)After the event, looking at how the findings, and which findings travel through society, who is able ans willing to use the said information.
Look, these are some steps that i am aware of because i am who i am. This infromation helps locate certain answers but its not a ‘filter’ its contextual info.
I mean, 2) is what my respondants in the ganj seem really interested in. Sometimes half the time they are pinning me down, sizing me up asking me stuff especially because im not their to count or ‘develop’ them. apnar uddesho qui?
Native informants.
When i see it i will credit it and i will be overjoyed and i will kiss it.
‘I still havent found what i’m looking for..’(reprise)
Cultural authenticity
I’ve heard this word from deshi bloggers puzzled by the religious bent of mind(findmeabetterterm) such as yourself quite a few, though im not sure it really applies to me.
I am not an advocate of museum culture. Nor of a parochial bengalism that would reject the battle of plassey on account of the protagonists not being bengali. Yes the contributions of Atish Dipankar should be researched upon. Is that pre islamic and bengali enough?
Will write about civil society later, this is not the space.
June 29th, 2007 at 4:48 pm
Hey man,
It’s hard enough for me to read English without having to imagine commas. How about next time you punctuate instead of leaving it to the readers’ imagination?
Actually I’m not puzzled by the religious bent of mind. I’m religious myself as my rants should show. What puzzles me is how religion is seen by some as a sort of indiction against all things Western. If people like this had been alive in the time of Muhammad (PBUH), and heard him say “go to China for knowledge”, they would have accused him of trying to bring about a Chinese invasion of the Arab Peninsula. Get my drift?
“Finding out the niyyat.
1)Scrutinising the social processes behind the funding for the alleged science
2)Asking them and squeezing their brains!
3)Reading the work critically, what are they interested in and who are they addressing.
4)After the event, looking at how the findings, and which findings travel through society, who is able ans willing to use the said information.”
Amazing list must say. Amazing in how much bias can creep in on the part of the person trying to find out the “niyyat”. For instance, take #4. If I apply it to you I would have to conclude (but i know better than to do so) that you’re an “agent” of either Jamaat or BNP because your rhetoric is definitely going to be used by them. Just as Prof. Muzaffer becomes an AL “agent” because his anti-corruption rhetoric is used by AL. Fascinating logic!
June 29th, 2007 at 6:36 pm
Thanks to drishtipat for taking a initiative for open discussion about contemporary subjects. Internet is a great medium to express opinion, to share opinion and for collectively build an opinion. I know another initiative like this. This is http://www.bddiscussion.com .This is effective trend for our new generation and all of us should support such initiatives.