Mon 23 Apr 2007
Whoever was behind the thinking of forcing out the two leaders miscalculated on 1 key point. They figured that the end justifies the means. In the process, they thought they could manipulate every single institution that came its way. Brute force works in pulling down illegal building and flooring out slums where there is no organized protest. But it doesn’t work in killing democratice institutes in democracy. The checks and balances are there for a reason. Here is a good example of executive activism stopped by the judiciary. The handling of the whole situtation by the CTG was a copy book case of how not to handle cases like this. The whole move is so incredibly short sighted that you have to wonder who is advising the New Order in matters like this.
If I have to pick a winner in this saga, it is definitely the two justices who must have stood up under intense pressure to give the ruling against the government against the Khaleda confinement. It is even more pleasing to hear that these justices were actually appointed by Awami League and hence it wasn’t a case of old loyality to Khaleda. Partisanship, for a change, took a back seat this time.
They have been unable to put Khaleda away and Hasina’s arrest warrant has been withdrawn and its only a matter of time before she is back. But the damage that has been done to this government is almost irreversible. The sooner they reverse this decision, the better chance they have in controlling the damage. It has now become evident that even if the two leaders are away, it will be for a temporary period and their influence over the party will not wane at all. You will only have to look at Pakistan’s PPP and Muslim League where Benajir Bhutto and Nawaj Sharif are still running the show in both the parties from exile. So what is the outcome of the whole drama that unfolded last few days? Among others, the following ones are the ones that are obvious.
- The two leaders, whose popularity was perhaps on an all time low before this incident, have become heroes for their non-compromising stand.
- The credibility of the interim government is shattered.
- They have completely now lost the moral ground on key issues like independence of judiciary and fundamental human rights and press freedom.
- The popularity of the CTG has taken a dive.
- The genuine cases against the corrupt leaders will now be seen as fake.
Its a big shame. Because, with a huge popular backing, this government really had a chance to bring in genuine reforms. Its still early to say what will happen eventually. Its slowly becoming clear that they will be unable to keep Khaleda and Hasina away by brute force for long (without resorting to outright martial law) and anyone will be able to tell you that in Bangladesh today there is no justifiable reason to declare martial law.
After a long time, AL got its act together. It did a very credible job in launching worldwide media initiative in protesting this forcible exile. The work of a relatively young brigade which handled the media matter is ample enough reason for the party to reform and shed the old, expired leaders to give the new blood a chance.
A number of events may have had a factor to put the minus 2 plan in trouble. But the lobbying and the intense international media focus put the US and UK government in a very uncomfortable position of defending the extra-legal manner of the whole process. As they are backing this government heavily, they were seen as backing a very undemocratic process. As a result, the Bangladeshi foreign adviser in London got a lambusting when he came to House of Lords. More significant, may be, however, was US State Department’s South Asia related under secretary Nick Burn’s statement saying that the action of the caretaker government in delaying the election process was unacceptable. He expressed his profound disappointment that the caretaker government is yet to take any meaningful action towards the election. He deemed the 1 year timeline for election too long as well.
Now where do we go from here?
From the very beginning we stressed the importance of clear and transparent due process for the trial and conviction of the allegedly corrupt individuals. Its in absolutely the best interest of the country and its future growth and to make sure that the guilty are put away for their crimes without raising the quesiton about legitamacy of their trial process. However, for some unknown reason, gradually as days went by not only the actions of the government became more non-transparent, thanks to the two outspoken advisers Moinul and Matin, the M&Ms, the lack of coordination between what they were doing and what they were saying became more and more aparent.
Now the only way to control the damage that has been done is to stop this farce of minus 2 plan and go back to the original work of reforming the institutes and have strong electoral laws that automatically forces democracy inside the party. In this vein, I don’t think the ensuring a term limit for a prime minister is not a bad idea at all. But that’s a different discussion alltogether. More importantly they need to get back into the business of having the election as soon as possible.
You can fool some people some time,
But you can’t fool all the people,all of the time!
If this doesn’t alert the people that Musharraf solution will not work in Bangladesh, I don’t know what will. Perhaps this is the best positive out of the whole sordid saga.
April 23rd, 2007 at 7:12 pm
Dear Asif
I appreciate your analysis of the situation but yet strongly believe that both these ladies have done enough damage to our country and I don’t see how any good can come out in the long run if both are not dealt with immediately, we definitely need new blood in the political arena since one is corrupt to the bone and the other is short sighted, stubborn and incompetent.
April 23rd, 2007 at 7:33 pm
I have noticed a recent change in people’s reaction to the CG and it’s advisers. Various Blog participants are questioning the wisdom of exiling the two begums and even some members of AL (Suranjit SG) and BNP (H. Shah) are openly expressing their views regarding this matter. All this is happening during a time when the CG has banned all political activities.
I beleive the two most talkative advisers Mainul and Matin are mostly responsible forthe Hasina/Khaleda debacle in the short term. The two advisors don’t know when to shutup and are responsible for giving misleading information about Khaleda and Hasina. One day they say there is no plan to exile the begums and the next day the CG sends out letters to all airlines to not allow Sheikh Hasina on board any Bangladesh bound flight.
People don’t like being lied to and fed disinformation. The power behind the CG should ask these two advisors to be more prudent with the remarks they make to the media.
April 23rd, 2007 at 7:52 pm
There is a lot of talk about ‘genuine reform’ these days (esp. here at DP). However, is a there true consensus as to what these reform measures might entail? May be as a mental exercise, we here at DP could initiate/investigate/propose a toy-model for a ‘reform-initiative’.
The recent brouhaha/outrage over CTG’s missteps has clearly demonstrated that our collective online voices certainly amounts to something. In that spirit, may be… maybe some one will pay heed to our concerns for a true reform in Bangladesh.
As always, hoping for the best
LG
April 23rd, 2007 at 7:55 pm
Tnx Asif !
I would place more info regarding Asif’s Analysis within 1 Hr.
April 23rd, 2007 at 8:02 pm
If a ‘jatiyo shorkar’ is the ultimate goal of the interim govt (or the military), then why not keep both party heads in it, giving it more legitimacy and more public support?
whether KZ and/or SH are still effective as party leaders or are replaced, they may try to play a more vital and constructive role in the decision making process…charges can still be brought against those who have been involved in corruption, criminal behaviour and maladminstration, even to the highest order.
the interim goverment really need to take more calculative steps and ensure they do not lose public support…bringing out vague charges, not working with the AG office and the intelligence branches, the way they are playing into the hands of SH and KZ, i wonder if ‘damage control’ is even viable at this stage.
April 23rd, 2007 at 8:33 pm
An excellenct blog, Asif. There seems to be serious lack of cooridination between the advisers and the ones who ‘backed’ them. We can easily guess who are these people behind this exile drama.
I hope the CTG will take lesson from this experience and will realise that the people and the international community did not give them a blank cheque regarding our politics and our future. The CTG should have realised earlier that its each and every move was being observed by the international community with whose explicit support they were installed 3 months back.
Lets hope we’ll soon have a correct voter list and a suitable atmosphere for holding a free and fair election. Lets hope democracy will prevail. Hasina and Khaleda may or may not stay in our political arena, but let that be decided by our people, and not by the CTG.
April 23rd, 2007 at 8:43 pm
Look at the International Media
According to DNAINDIA
Bangladesh goes Pak way
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1092637
According to Bruneitimes
Curtains for powerful Begums of Bangladesh
http://www.bruneitimes.com.bn/details.php?shape_ID=27954
According to REUTERS
Bangladeshis mull fate of political matriarchs
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DHA3477.htm
According to India Daily:
Why is Bangladesh so afraid about Former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina?
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/16522.asp
According to IHT:
Bangladesh court suspends arrest warrant for former prime minister
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/04/23/asia/AS-GEN-Bangladesh-Leaders-Arrest.php
According to ZEEnews
Bangladesh court suspends arrest warrant against Hasina
http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?aid=367310&sid=SAS&ssid=
According to Finnancial Express
Court stays warrant of arrest order against Hasina on IO’s plea
http://www.financialexpress-bd.com/index3.asp?cnd=4/24/2007§ion_id=1&newsid=59190&spcl=no
Ban on Hasina’s return raised during Iftekhar-Margaret meet
http://www.financialexpress-bd.com/index3.asp?cnd=4/24/2007§ion_id=2&newsid=59182&spcl=no
According to Indiaenews:
Court stays warrant against Hasina
http://www.indiaenews.com/bangladesh/20070423/48653.htm
According to BBC
Sheikh Hasina warrant suspended
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6583729.stm
According to REUTERS
Bangladesh ex-PM says won’t go into exile
http://in.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2007-04-23T173540Z_01_NOOTR_RTRJONC_0_India-295274-2.xml
Bangladesh court suspends arrest warrant for ex-PM
http://in.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2007-04-23T163701Z_01_NOOTR_RTRJONC_0_India-295286-1.xml
According to Channel 5
Bangladesh court suspends arrest warrant for ex-prime minister
http://www.newschannel5.tv/News/Other/967572/
According to ALJAZEERA
Hasina: I will fight charges
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/806F70E9-02FF-4478-AA91-EBFBA908A333.htm
April 23rd, 2007 at 8:59 pm
Thank you Asif for nice analysis.
As per our constitution Election is the main task of a CTG. But they are doing everything other than Election work. Any reform for fair election can be appreciated by all and everyone will support it.
I think it is now clear that adviser M&M tried to take an advantage of the situation. They want to stay longer period. Some of the leaders of both AL and BNP are behind the scene. It is not clear about AL leader, but BNP leaders are identified.
In last five years who operate Hawa Bhaban are now talking about so called minus 2 plans. Why corrupt ministers, MPs, leaders with Mannan Bhuiyan are out of jail? How they organised political meeting at Mannan Bhuiya’s residence?
Last few days I read in newspaper that following leaders visited Bhuiya’s residence.
Hawa Bhaban Key persons-
1. Lutfuzzaman Babar
2. Ehsanul Huq Milon
3. Zahiruddin Shawpon
4. Mofiqul Islam Tripty
We also read that Mayor Sadek Hossain Khoka, Mayor Mizanur Rahman Minu, Prof. Rezaul Karim, Major Kamrul, Masud Aurun, Rezaul Bari Dina, Omar Khoiam visited Bhuiya’s house. Their free movement indicates that they are the honest people in eye of CTG.
Is the increased wealth of above persons in last 5 years justified their legal income? I hope ACC will look up the matter.
April 23rd, 2007 at 9:00 pm
A third Asif weighs in!
Regarding the post and the first response: yes, these two former PMs have done a lot of damage to the country. Something has to give here. The oft-repeated complaint that neither party practices democracy is a good starting point. Lordgaruda, open, regular party primaries should be made mandatory. There you go, reform 1!
But here’s where the CG messed up: why exile? Why the washing of our dirty laundry in public? Why all this talk of “corruption” and then subversion of the rule of law? Does fighting fire with fire make any sense when the country’s burning?
It will be extremely, extremely sad if those statements and pressure from foreign sources is what led the CG to come to this decision. To quote Shadakalo: Je jai Lonkay shei hoy Rabon! Once in power, everyone seems to lose their brains and shut their ears.
Lastly, kudos to the mainstream media! You papers never spoke about party leadership or the cult of personality that these two have built around themselves. Now you won’t talk about the plans to exile them. DS is running an editorial on the French elections for God’s sakes! Wake up nation…
April 23rd, 2007 at 10:11 pm
As they are backing this government heavily, they were seen as backing a very undemocratic process. As a result, the Bangladeshi foreign adviser in London got a lambusting when he came to House of Lords.
Asif, if you were posting this article as a podcast, you could play a laughtrack after this segment.
The fact that the EC is in danger of being seen to be supportive of a military backed coup wouldn’t be as funny as admitting that, as in Iraq, it’s a pro-democratic tactic. But to pretend that it’s part of a greater democratic project for which the poor Bangladeshi foreign adviser in London is briefed on, is a nice peice of British theatre that we all have to play along with.
If the CTG are issue legal writs to arrest Hasina and then declare her “absconding” while barring her entry into the country isn’t bad enough, she’s on every press agency in the world, singing songs about it. Making the CTG look like a group of men caught in a room with their pants around their ankles.
Now would be a good time to hand the decision making power back to Fakhruddin and the civilian contingent of the CTG.
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:07 pm
Mainul Hossain is now la-jawab!
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:20 pm
“Azizul Islam Says:
April 23rd, 2007 at 8:59 pm
As per our constitution Election is the main task of a CTG.”
Let’s not forget the current government is not a CTG one. We may call them military-backed interim government or outright military government with a civilian facade. Unlike CTG, power was not given to them rather they took it (most probably forcibly) from the so called CTG of Iajuddin. Once they have decided to go after both of the dynastic power, from that point on essentially they are riding on tigers back or like they have stepped onto the tail of a snake, now they must have to smash the head so that the snake can’t bite them anymore. After doing what they have done so far to both KZ and HS, this government will be very reluctant to handover power to the BNP/AL while keeping KZ and SH at the helm of their respective party.
I think the game is not over yet. Apparently, they failed most probably their best bet but surely they will come up with other ideas to neutralize both of them. But certainly the job has now become more complex than what was before the latest saga. Hope this does not push the military government too far that might force them to apply their ultimate weapon —the Marshal Law.
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:38 pm
Enough is Enough.
We have seen enough of the age-old political tradition. We now want something new. We need democracy but not the squalid ineffective western-style traditional democracy. They gave nothing for the underdeveoped or developing countries. For example, India has 60-year-long democracy but failed to change the lot of 1.2 billion people.
Pakistan was most time ruled by military and least of its time by demi-democracy. In fact, there is no basic difference between the two countries India and Pakistan; their economic condition is the same; both are nuclear power though. The truism is that so-called democracy failed them. The country all around us like Malayasia, Sngapoore etc without having the tandems of traditional western democracy doing far better than India. Even China is doing better, Vietnam is going to shine and it’s feared that chineese economy may surpass American economy.
To get real corruption-free political boost and economic boom we need poolitical stability in the country. The imported democracy is the cause of perrenial political instabilty, corruption and in real sense nothing but the oligracy or Dhalocracy [particracy]. This system promotes the potential for fund-raising in the developed world and extortion in the country like us. This traditional democracy is the cause of mass misery and failure to provide good governance for peace, progress and prosperity.
So, we need a home-grown culturily-and-geographically modified democracy or populocracy. And for that we need fresh start with new system and new parties.
Just keedping the members of two family away from politics is not enough to change or clean our politcial mess. Even without Khaleda and Hasina, eventually their future templates will do the same thing.
AWL, BNP and Jamat, these 3 parties should be banned. Their physical party symbols like Boat, Paddysheaf, and Scale [Dari-palla] and their ideological models like Mujib, Zia and Moududi should be kept out of the political premises. By these time we did enough personal worship and we worshiped them like cult leaders, rather than national leaders as we can sacrifice our blood in their names. It’s shameful as degrade humanity and self-esteem in doing so.
We can sacrifice parties but not humanity and basic human right. We can’t bar the uncorrupt members of any family, be it Mujib or Zia or any x,y,z, in choosing politics as their careers. If we do that it’s agaist the basic human and civil right.
The best way to bring positive change is to ban those parties and keep the corrupt politicians out of politics or even in jail if they deserve. But force eviction of any citizen is wrong, crime and denial of basic birth and human right.
Thanks.
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:46 pm
I support you Sid. The civilian facade of the govt is slowly waning away. It’s time for Dr. fakruddin to take charge and it’s time for Matin & Moinul to stop lying.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:56 am
I would like to see mandatory leadership contest within all Bangladeshi political parties.
But we all know, no one within BNP or AL would have the courage to run againts Khaleda or Hasina. So how do we solve this problem?
We allow party members to pick potential party leaders by secret ballot, 3-5 persons receiving the most votes will be entered into the second phase of the contest, these persons would not be allowed to drop out of the contest. The leader can be elected in the third round or there can be further rounds to narrow down the contest to two candidates.
If Hasina or Khaleda prevail, we must respect the decision of the party members.
In the meantime the so called “Sushil Shomaj” should think about forming a political party. Mr. Mahfuz Anam could lead this new party
Other choices which comes to mind are Dr. Yunus/D. Bhattacharjo/Prof Muzaffer Ahmad. Long “Broktitas” (speeches) alone will not solve the country’s problem nor will declaring the country to be most corrupt. We need new political leaders with name recognition to come forward.
I really hated the way CTG handled the Hasina/Khaleda exile issue. The CTG has lost lot of credibility with their conflicting remarks. I doubt people will trust what they say anymore.
My Report card on Khaleda(BNP)/Hasina(AL)/CTG-military (CM)
A month ago:
CM - 8
Hasina - 3
Khaleda - 0
Today:
CM - 3
Hasina - 8.5
Khaleda - 0
Ershad/Jamaat did not register on my scale.
April 24th, 2007 at 1:36 am
Hasina then-
Hasina now-
April 24th, 2007 at 2:17 am
Dear Afsar Ali
Please recall that they took oath as “Adviser of non partisan neutral care taker government”.
Dear bitterboy, when Ershad came to power in 1982, unfortunately he also utters same words as you. He also told about change in politics. We know how he broke AL and BNP. We not forgot how BNP leader Huda-Matin or AL leader Mizan chy-Korban Ali joined Jatiya Party. Formula was same.
I fully disagree with you; economy of India is much stronger than Pakistan. Please compare the economic parameters. Please also compare social indicators like human rights etc.
In Bangladesh, Economic growth was tremendous under democracy. Our growth rate was almost 7 percent over the period of last 15 years. Civil rights also increased. In last five years media published many story regarding corruption, misuse of power of the then BNP government. Some even may be fabricated or false. Where are our civil rights now?
CTG is talking against corruption, but their steps are not neutral. Paltan case, Jamat did not mention the name of Sheikh Hasina. But neutral CTG include SH and dropped the name of Abdur Razzak and Tofayel Ahmed. Indication is clear. Is Obaidul Quader did more corruption then Razzak, Amu, Tofayel?
We read in newspaper in last 5 years that most of the ministers and MPs are corrupt. When we saw branded corrupt leaders are meeting at Manna Bhuiyan’s residence, we understand what is the new brand of democracy? Is new brand of democracy means grabbing the state power or taking the position of top post of big political parties with an unfair means? Democracy is not failed, some people may fail. If a newspaper run a fabricated story, does not use as a cause of ban of press freedom.
April 24th, 2007 at 2:30 am
Bitterboy,
I am starting to enjoy your postings. It is nice to see that you are starting to lay equal blame on both the principal parties for creating the mess in which we find ourselves today.
Just a minor clarification to your posting above. Indian and Pakistani economies are quite different at this time. You maybe surprised to see the following numbers from a CIA publication (numbers for 2006). The Indian economy is about nine times bigger than the Pakistani economy. Also, the per capita income in india is about 50 % higher than that in Pakistan.
Source:https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html
GDP (purchasing power parity) rankings
1.World $ 65,000,000,000,000
2.USA $ 12,980,000,000,000
3.EU $ 12,820,000,000,000
4.China $ 10,000,000,000,000
5.Japan $ 4,220,000,000,000
6.India $ 4,042,000,000,000
7.Germany $ 2,585,000,000,000
8.UK $ 1,903,000,000,000
9.France $ 1,871,000,000,000
10.Italy $ 1,727,000,000,000
28.Pakistan $ 427,300,000,000
32.Bangladesh $ 330,800,000,000
GDP - Per Capita rankings
154. India $ 3,700
167. Pakistan $ 2,600
175. Bangladesh $ 2,200
April 24th, 2007 at 4:02 am
Democracy, in whatever form, is non-negotiable. The current situation reminds me of one Bangla proverb: Hatir Hoyechey Shokh Shikhibey Selai.(The elephnat wants to learn stiching!)
Moinul failed to manage New Nation (his newspaper), now he is managing the nation!
April 24th, 2007 at 5:07 am
It is crystal clear from comments abuzz in the net, that not only SH and KZ are FAILED national leaders, but it is NOW time to retire them, to move-on to the next level of a democratic system.
If the people were truly given a choice through some reliable ELECTRONIC system, it would be obvious that the two ladies would disappear from the list. Reasons being their failure to curb grand corruption, and total failure to give people the basic human needs.
Their sentimental Mujib-Zia, Jatir Pita, Jatir Netri type of politics succeeds in grabbing people’s sentiments, however it fails to achieve the nation-building goals that have been too little, too late.
Thus, if we need to curb their continued distortion of the fair democratic process, and bring on fresh and able leadership, it is necessary to STOP any further PM positions for them. Steps may be taken by:
1. Limit the PM term to ONE TERM ONLY, which makes both of them disqualified, immediately.
2. Give them fair trials if charged, on public TV, exposed to whole nation, as a deterrent and a due process.
3. BAN ANYBODY from national politics (incl SH and KZ), who has ONCE or ANYTIME been convicted of criminal offence, incuding corruption.
4. Add provision for IMPEACHMENT in system, so that new PM can be fired any time during term.
5. Expose all their assets and properties, and freeze and RETURN any assets that are over and above their legal wealth (belongong to nation).
These steps will stop the continued repitition of FAILED despots and rogue leaders in govt, and will protect people from democratic STALEMATES severely damaging to nations growth.
April 24th, 2007 at 6:33 am
I think more tough times are waiting ahead for CTG. One of the reason behind kick out KZ & SH is ( in my opinion ) because those tough & strict law which has been drafted by EC ( Election commission ) and ACC ( anti corruption commission ), HAS to be ACCEPTED, RECOGNIZED by major political party like BNP & AL before election. In the leadership of KZ & SH, and without reformation of those party ( dumping alleged corrupted figures ), without ensuring democracy in the party, it’s highly unlikely they are going to accept, recognize those law by EC and ACC. Not until they make sure those law become nonfunctional or ineffective one way or another.
For example there is so much of public demand on political reform, good governance, jihad against corruption, so many alleged ex law makers are in jail from both side,, but those TOP TWO ladies hardly ever talked on these issue. As if these people were never belong to them, nor they have any responsibility, nor they have anything to do with! All they care for an early election for obvious reason, and no matter what.
Having said that, so far this two party and their leadership has been proven all those days, and without drastic reformation inside the party, those law by EC and ACC may not be accepted or effective, and a well desired public demand, … a political reform in Bangladesh history may remain undone this time again. I hope current CTG find some way to push the political reform in those political party. But the way Mr. Mainul failed and messed up with CTG’s reputation, he should step down right now, and current CTG should start on this regard fresh again.
Funny thing is … current CTG have to build up the field of a free and fair election, have to make sure law and constitution is functioning neutral, reform EC, reform ACC, reform police & public administration, drive against corruption, drive against syndicate, and every piece of sh** ‘THEY’ made or failed all those days, but those two ladies and their parties has nothing to do but showing anger when it seems going against their interest! or at best, wait until every thing is ready for them!
April 24th, 2007 at 6:47 am
The CTG is definitely painting itself into a corner. It is in apparent distress re getting irrefutable proof on some of the detainees. This was alluded to in one of the Mas(h)uds’ recent admission that they do not have the expertise to analyze the legality of financial transactions, etc. Thus the morphing of the promised transparent, due process to a now murky one.
Couple that with its fast-diminishing credibility with the byebye-to-battling-begums fiasco, and they are now not only painted into a corner, but between a rock and a hard place as well. They are thus in no position to declare any of the detainees to be innocent of the charges, even if the facts say so, after the great show put on with dramatic midnight raids and what not.
Have it from very reliable/first hand sources that the CTG crimebusters have now resorted to kidnapping relatives of some of the detainees and coercing them to sign “confessions” of offering bribes to the CTG/”powers that be” for the release of the detainees. This in turn is being used to elicit self-indictments from the detainees, under the threat of harm befalling their relatives bcs of their “confessed crimes”.
Looks like BD does not get a break even this time around — the dreams of change for the better are changing to nightmares reminiscent of 1971!
April 24th, 2007 at 6:49 am
Thanks Asif,good analysis indeed!
I think, the public reaction flared up strongly and even more negatively to the “Minus 2 plan” as the CTG imposed restriction on Hasina’s return, besides issuing the warrant of arrest on murder case.The “Minus 2” issue drew full international media attention as Hasina was barred to come back at London.(Pl see below for the link to read more on this) Her interviews with BBC, AlJajeera etc were convincing enough, with significant coverage.
When people in BD were waiting silently for the confirmation on Khaleda’s exile to KSA, it was, however, a blunder on CTG’s side in dealing with Hasina simultaneously, in an apparent effort of Championing at one go. So far, the reactions of BNP corner was relatively submissive to CTG( as usual the opportunist leaders even started fighting for grabbing party posts) without making a single statement on the ‘exile’ issue. Conversly, Sheikh Hasina was never to remain silent, ever, whatever the issue …as usual she has ignited this whole issue.
One more point: Sheikh Hasina has opposed the idea of KZ’s exile as well.
More on: http://www.newagebd.com/front.html#1
April 24th, 2007 at 7:17 am
Its more like minus -1 plan.
It will be really hard for Hasina to enter the country and really difficult (if not impossible) for CTG to send out Khaleda.
KZ is here to stay, and Hasina’s drama has yet to unfold.
There are also rumors that the whole Khaleda drama was created so that Khaleda and family can be allowed to meet with Tarek.
April 24th, 2007 at 7:49 am
To bdfact#19:
“Moinul failed to manage New Nation (his newspaper), now he is managing the nation!”
Good Joke man :-)…pl say some thing abt the other hyperactive adviser!
April 24th, 2007 at 8:03 am
To Whom Who Can Clear Me,
I guess, speculate and some also says, keeping two leaders inside the country, the honest members of the 2 parties just can not really contribute in the real reformation of the parties.
There were some such efforts by the true, dedicated, honest and patriot members - but they failed miserably - they matter drew attention to the CTG specially the EC - they (2 leaders) by no means want certain reformation widely discussed and hailed by people from all corners, in seminars, by foreigners and almost all. Because, the proposed reformation would curtail their autocracy, unilateral monopoly like control over everything.
I am very much comprehensive and complacent in my believe that - Bangladesh can not be under no circumstances like Pakistan. Mossarrof, Benjir, Nawaz do not and can not stand to the likely outcome of the mega efforts undertaken by CTG.
ALO
April 24th, 2007 at 8:25 am
Sheikh Hasina’s probable next step:
1. She will go to Kolkata.
2. Then She will go the nearest transit point
3. IF CTG will not allow her to enter BD, she will start hunger strike at the point of ENTRY.
4. She will continue it, UNTIL the CTG would not withdraw the ban order.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:15 pm
Shushanta,
I just checked with the AL sources here and they completely deny this information on her visit to calcutta. She will be in London until she can go back to BD. This type of misinformation is very misleading. You are not helping your party by spreading these imaginary info.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
Rumman, Pls read the word ‘Probable’ in my postings.
Any kinds of personal info write to me directly.Pls avoid using DP. PLS PLS.
sushanta
engrsdg@gmail.com
April 24th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
Firstly, (and this is a minor gripe)why does SH keep on pointing out she’s the daughter of the father of the nation? Why should this give her any special privileges under law? (Surely she’s been afforded enough privilege already)
Secondly, although it’s clear that the military have had a public relations nightmare this week and bungled their plans for exile, this is no bad thing as exile would be the wrong step. One positive is that now the world’s media is far more alert to Bangladesh’s problems, and this places the military under far more pressure.
Another is that there is that surely the BNP and AL will be forced to reform, which is what everyone wants, isn’t it?
And now the military will be forced to come up with proper charges against SH, KZ and their cronies, and then presumably make them face these charges - SH has already said that’s what she’ll do. The most important thing, surely, is that SH and KZ are treated as ordinary Bangladeshi citizens.
What is crucial is that this international and national pressure is kept up so that both the military and the begums have to reform. Politics must be restored therefore, so this can happen.
April 24th, 2007 at 1:29 pm
Geeteara says she won’t care about human rights for now, but her own…(bdnews.com)
This is exactly the reason why the country should not be run by unelected technocrats! Just outrageous! The caretaker government has lost my support.
April 24th, 2007 at 2:03 pm
The first impulse of the BD politician has always been “LOOK AFTER NUMBER ONE”.
After all, she’s part of the Care Taker Government. So she’s Taking Care of her own interests first.
April 24th, 2007 at 2:15 pm
Why waste national funds to EXILE these SH-KZ dinosaurs with deshi servants, suitcases full of US-dollars and a luxury lifestyle in Saudi or USA?
For the lagatar hartals, boycotts, corruption and total ignorance of democracy and admin for 15 years, just keep them back to desh, and house arrest them adjacent to Kashimpur jail.
April 24th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
For the sake of the nation, and their respective part both SH and LZ should have resigned from politics long time ago. I think people would have liked them more if they had done so…
April 24th, 2007 at 4:27 pm
I believe that dynasty-laden politics gives birth to incompetence, sycophancy, cronyism and sweeping corruption. However, in the context of South Asian countries, dynasty also symbolizes unity. Older democracies like India and Sri Lanka could not get out of this dynast fetish of their populaces.
In Bangladesh, AL was at shambles after the death of Sheikh Mujbur Rahman until Sheikh Hasina took the reigns in early eighties. In her watch the party gained more and more popular votes in every succeeding elections for two decades. The same could be said about BNP under Khaleda Zia. Despite some dissents among party leaders, she was able to build an “uncompromising” image to rally support behind her and reunite her party.
What ahppens after minus-2 will be Tarek taking power of BNP after few years and Hasina/Joy taking over AL. We will be back to dynasty again. Quick-fix will fail. I don’t like dynast, but there are many who do. I will go with the majority choice, not the bunch like me.
Remember, you deserve the leadeship you have.
April 24th, 2007 at 6:12 pm
Shushanta, I know you are doing a good job by informing us abt Sheikh Hasina’s moves. But unless the party makes its plans public, I think it would not be wise to disclose the plans. I know you are concerned about the situation and are a true wellwisher of SH. You might also have the opportunity to learn in advance about the decisions the party leaders are taking, or discussing. But if you disclose these plans in advance, the people who are against SH or AL, may take measures against these plans. That might ruin the whole effort.
However, keep us sending the useful links and news that have already been made public. I eagerly wait for your comments, and I find them really useful.
April 24th, 2007 at 10:34 pm
Abdul Gaffar Chow writes an excellent op-ed about the minus 2 plan.
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/chn.pdf
April 24th, 2007 at 10:34 pm
My continuing thoughts on the minus-2 situation
http://addafication.com/2007/04/24/exile-iii/
April 25th, 2007 at 4:22 am
This is somewhat tangential to the main post and can lead to protracted off topic debate - advanced apologies if that happens.
There are rumours in several blogs that Hasina might go to India. If she does so, that would be a tremendous blunder on her part. Think of the impact on the election when democracy does return. On one corner, there will be Begum Zia who stared down an unelected regime’s attempt to deport her. On the other side, there will be Hasina Wajed who ran to the regional hegemon India to destabilise Bangladesh. Anyone thinking that in that context AL will win knows nothing about the electoral arithmetic in Bangladesh.
Further, AL will not be the real victim in a campaign based on the images of Khaleda and Hasina. AL survived many electoral set backs, it will survive another one. It will still be the largest opposition party. The real victim will be the country’s politics. The politics based on the parties’ policy platforms and performance of the candidates will again be overtaken by politics of emotions and images. We desparately need to have and resolve genuine debates about our relationship with India. But that will be drowned out by the accusation that ‘Hasina is India’s dalal and that’s why she went there during emergency’. And BNP’s utter failure in governance during 2001-06 will be forgotten as Khaleda emerges as the icon of resistance for the second time in her career.
May 4th, 2007 at 7:44 pm
[...] do we have here? Changed circumstances. So your “backers” failed to pave your way by subtracting two others from the scene? One [...]