From the pages of NYT — A Good Provider Is One Who Leaves. Not Bangladesh-specific per se, but no less relevant to the emigration issues of our country. Quite long and beautifully written.
About 200 million migrants from different countries are scattered across the globe, supporting a population back home that is as big if not bigger. Were these half-billion or so people to constitute a state — migration nation — it would rank as the world’s third-largest. While some migrants go abroad with Ph.D.’s, most travel as Emmet did, with modest skills but fearsome motivation. The risks migrants face are widely known, including the risk of death, but the amounts they secure for their families have just recently come into view. Migrants worldwide sent home an estimated $300 billion last year — nearly three times the world’s foreign-aid budgets combined. These sums — “remittances” — bring Morocco more money than tourism does. They bring Sri Lanka more money than tea does.
The numbers, which have doubled in the past five years, have riveted the attention of development experts who once paid them little mind. One study after another has examined how private money, in the form of remittances, might serve the public good. A growing number of economists see migrants, and the money they send home, as a part of the solution to global poverty.
Yet competing with the literature of gain is a parallel literature of loss. About half the world’s migrants are women, many of whom care for children abroad while leaving their own children home. “Your loved ones across that ocean . . . ,” Nadine Sarreal, a Filipina poet in Singapore, warns:
Will sit at breakfast and try not to gaze
Where you would sit at the table.
Meals now divided by five
Instead of six, don’t feed an emptiness.
April 25th, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Zub, please don’t stop putting up good posts and resort to posting stuff that will titillate the masses just because there wasn’t a slew of comments. I can’t speak for anyone else, but I read the article with much interest, even if I didn’t originally post a comment.
April 26th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
Hi,
I am interested in learning more about human rights issues of Bangladeshi migrants in the Middle East. I came across an earlier article on the subject linked to this site. Could anyone point me to further information.
Thanks!
April 27th, 2007 at 2:45 am
These 200 million migrants are in essence prisoners abroad due to poverty back in their own country. Though apparently they’re earning good money and helping ease lives of their relatives, almost everyone suffers some sort of nostalgia and feel the pangs for being not able to attend at the ills, death or any other disaster of their families due to immigration or visa related problem.
The visa barriers across the countries should be abolished for good for the real liberty of mankind. We should weaken our national bondage and campaign for globalism to achieve this end of Visa-free world and one-nation state for the whole world what I called Human Nation State.
Thanks.
April 27th, 2007 at 9:24 am
For most of history, people were free to move across international borders. Passports started only during World War I, and visas as we know them started during the 1930s. Free mobility of people, like free trade in capital and goods, is fundamental to a liberal world.
Bitterboy, I like the idea of a global state. My personal ideal world is a world full of city states, with free movement of goods, capital, labour and ideas across cities.
These may sound like mere dreams, but our grandparents couldn’t dream about us discussing these from thousands of miles apart.
Zubaer, I second So’s comment.