During last years of Ershad, there was a tide of road building projects throughout Dhaka. ‘Bijoy Swaronee”, “Pantha Path” and “Malibagh Biswa Road’. Beautifully paved road, walled out from the neighborhoods by ceramic/grill walls. There was bougainvillea blossoming on still grilled structures in short intervals. They all really looked like parkways and malls rather than a 3 rd world country road.
Soon after Ershad fall, all the beautification vanished. Pantha path pavments and Biswa road footpaths turned into slums, and fish markets. Those bougainvilleas all are gone. The still frames for bougainvilleas turned into structures holding the shanties. Middle class people resented democracy and thought Ershad was better off.
Over the next 15 years “Pantha Path” slums disappeared, most people in those shanties moved to better housing farther from the pavements as they could afford better places. Thanks to the construction boom on pantha path.
Some got job in garments factories around and moved to a better home. But some shanties on ‘Biswa Road’ remained throughout last 15 years. The inhabitants are still struggling and hoping for a construction boom along the biswa road where they will get jobs. (This may be coming soon). As Ershad was gone, the people living in those slums were protected by two people. Mirza Abbas and Saber Hossain Chowdhury. They are the elected representatives from this area. They protected them because these slum dwellers are voters too.
In fact not person Mirza Abbas or Saber Chowdhury protected them to stay in the road side slum and struggle for a better life and eventually move on. It was democracy which protected them from being made homeless.
What temporary measure we have now is a big relief for most of the nation. I have revived my cancelled trip to Dhaka. Weddings, picnics go on as planned. Factories are open round the clock. Economy grows. These all are true.
But as democracy failed, the basic principle of democracy, i.e. voice of every single one in the society is inactivated now. So the poor minority is again homeless in the cold winter. Thousands of street vendors are suddenly robbed of their means of living.
I failed to talk to my parents last several days. Raids on VoIP have taken down many VoIP businesses. Suddenly I feel disconnected. What was the reasoning?
Can T&T give us as cheap and extensive service as these young innovative entrepreneurs were giving us? Why demolish it without making an alternate way to call to and from abroad? Rather than destroying a much needed service industry couldn’t we simply bring them under tax revenue coverage?
Reasoning is a by product of democracy. We lose that with demise of democracy.
Until recently India usually did not try to hide it’s street slums by demolishing them. Rather a democratic India cleaned itself inside out and now in upcoming Indian cities, you won’t necessarily see much of a slum. They are vanishing rapidly. Not by bulldozers, but by slow steady economic democracy.
In our Bangladesh, we need a democracy that will also ensure the right for a shelter of the poor. Until very recently we had this assurance.
January 26th, 2007 at 6:11 pm
‘poor minority’ ?? Since when the poor became minority in BD ?
January 26th, 2007 at 9:49 pm
Rumi bhai,
I have not seen the Ershad era, was too young but whenever I hear other people talking they are now saying that time was better than the previous 15 years.
I believe whenever a govenment takes any action they should have alternatives in place for the affected people. I believe the sufferings of these poor people in this winter carries more importance than keeping our streets clean for the well to do’s.
January 26th, 2007 at 11:01 pm
Term ‘Poor Minority’ sounds very awesome to me.
As a mid-mid-age-man I always heard most Bangladeshis live under poverty level. Sometimes, even we were looked so down by the developed countries and bave been reported many a times that majority of Bangladeshi live sub-human standard of lives.
Now if the poor become really a minority group it’s a big news to me. Awesome! Awesome!
Hope and pray, one day this poor minority will be totally phased out of our society. It will just exist in the history book and museum.
January 27th, 2007 at 12:49 am
Rumi Bhai,
Thank you for pointing out why when all is said and done we need democracy.
Yes the politicians behaved poorly in the recent past. But there is a very good reason for the way both parties behaved. Our post-1990 system meant that the winner of one election gets to control everything from the Presidency of the Republic to the chairmanship of local cricket club for five years. Under that system, it was perfectly rational for the parties to do what they did.
But that system is a very poor form of democracy. Unless the current regime manages to address this issue, we’ll be back to the December 2006 circus in a couple of decades.
January 27th, 2007 at 7:47 pm
I do see light at the end of the tunnel though. What we should realisticly accept is Jatiya Party, Awami League and BNP are here to stay. When people speak of a overhaul of a political system I like to interpret it as these parties becoming more compatible to the democracy we need.
The forthcoming moha-jot government will not be a one-party dominates all sweep over the country like previous elections. The very nature of its coalition means that the individual componenets will be keeping each other in-check. Something other democracies achieve by having a credible opposition. In the meantime hopefully they will learn from the previous 4-party alliance governments mistakes, and at the same time BNP will work towards being a credible opposition.
January 28th, 2007 at 7:07 pm
Democracy is not just about staging an election. To succeed democracy must be supported by democratic institutions like an independent judiciary, police, election commission, participation in parliamentary sessions by all parties, etc….
We have gone through several “democratic” elections since the fall of HM Ershad but I can’t say either BNP or AL have been any better than Ershad, probably worse.
I am no fan of Ershad but I think if he must answer corruption charges for japani boat purchase and having 2 crore in his home then so must characters like Nazmul Huda, Falu, Tareq Rahman and others
January 29th, 2007 at 6:55 am
Tanveer: The forthcoming moha-jot government will not be a one-party dominates all sweep over the country like previous elections.
I hope this will be the case. But it is far from certain that this will happen. In fact, some simple arithmetic suggests that this won’t happen.
In 2001, BNP+JI had 46% of the votes against AL’s 41% and JP’s 7%. In the 1st past the post system, this 5 %age point lead gave BNP+JI 220 seats, against AL’s 60. Suppose there was an AL+JP jote in 2001. This would have had 48% vote. Suppose there was an LDP in 2001 and this resulted in a 2%age point drop in BNP vote. This not too implausible scenario results in AL+JP+LDP (ie mohajote excl minor left and rightwing parties) getting 50% of the votes against BNP+JI’s 44%. Again, with 1st past the post system, this 6%age point lead could easily have resulted in moha-jote getting over 225 seats (or 75% seats). How many of these 225 seats have been JP? 30? 40? How many for LDP? 20? This would still leave AL with 175 or so seats - enough for them to use the ‘brute majority’.
And what about BNP+JI? With 44% vote they would have less than 25% seats, just like with 41% vote AL had 20% of the seats. And worse still, with no effective local government, and no effective parliamentary committees, the opposition party has no stake in the system.
Until we find a way to accommodate the losing side, we are not likely to improve our democracy.