Open Letter to Abdul Jalil, the General Secretary, Awami League
Dear Mr. Abdul Jalil,
Ever since this morning, I am feeling very sick to my stomach. I feel like vomiting all day. It is not because of something I ate but it is because something that YOU did which is proving very hard to digest. You left us, who fought for some ideals, cheated. Just for some petty short-term interest of getting to power, you betrayed the policy that you championed the last 5 years.
Today, we watched with disbelief and horror your 5 point agreement with a little known party Khelafat-e-Majlish. You termed it as a “tactical electoral ploy”. My utter disbelief turned into shame when I turned on ATN Bangla to find you defending the “good fatwas” against the bad ones. When pressed on by the journalists, you said with total non chalance, “I know what I signed” without providing any explanation for why you did it. You couldn’t even defend the stand that you took and lied on camera saying that you didn’t sign anything regarding the Ahmadiyas where in fact you did sign an agreement regarding blasphemy law.
Excuse me, Mr. General Secretary(GS)! Have you got no shame?
Have you ever thought there are actually people who follow politics because they support a principal? Before throwing this slap at these people who has been supporting AL for a return to non religious politics, did you even care to think about them? Or Mr. GS, sitting in that well cushioned office for the president of Merchantile Bank, have you become so tone deaf that you can’t hear the pulse on the street or your own party? Just when we had to digest your open embrace with Ershad, you decided to slap us again with this new deal?
Mr. GS, do you know that once upon a time party the party that you head actually stood for something? In 1971, it brought upon secularism and social justice in the constitution. As much as it is hard for you to believe, there is a sizable population in Bangladesh who still believes in these ideals. You are making a huge mistake by taking them for a ride.
Dear Mr. Jalil,
You think the people who support secular politics and who are scared off by the poltics of BNP-Jamat have no choice but to vote for you? Well, think again. If there is so little difference between BNP-Jamat and Awami League, then they will just stay home come Election Day. If this deal is not cancelled, we will know that you care very little about the support of the progressive forces and are not afraid to plank down years of earned credibility and principals for the little gain, if any, you will make with the Moulana votes.
Dear Mr. Jalil,
It is by no accident that Awami League has been in power only for 5 years in the last 30 years. It is years of political ineptitude, inconsistencies and perception of opportunism by its leaders which caused this. More importantly it is because of such monumentally fatal decisions like these in the past 20 years which sealed its fate. But still we were willing to give you guys a second chance this time around seeing the long term danger of Jamat in politics. We chose to ignore years of Awami hypocrecy and inconsistencies. You went in election in1986 24 hours after declaring the participants of election under martial law would be called national traitors. You brought Jamat in the same table with you and gave them the first legitemicy. You first resuscitated Ershad in national politics to get into national alliance. All the time, critics said that there was no difference between BNP-Jamat and AL, your supporters said there was a lot at stake in this election and we simply can not afford another 5 years of accountability-less governance and religious infiltration in Bangladeshi politics of BNP. But your desperation to go to power at the cost of all ideals and philosophy, make our head to bow down in collective shame.
Mr. GS, how dare you ridicule and make light of our support for the ideals to which this country was founded? Mr. GS, you may think that this is election time and every thing you do is justified under the name of “tactical ploy”. Well, I have some news for you. In this election, if AL wins, it will be not because of they are a better party than BNP. It will be because people are so turned off by BNP, they like to vote for anyone but BNP. It is our misfortune that the ideals that we cherish are hijacked by people like you in Bangladeshi politics who has no sincerity for ideals or principle. To you, principles can change with every news cycle as long as you can provide your own self-made rationalization for your stand and say that the people are with you. . But do know that winter does not go away after one December. Next time, you need friends in the progressive circle; please do know that they will not forget this backstabbing. If they stay passive and do not treat you any differently than BNP-Jamat, please don’t be surprised. Because, after all, parties are judged by their actions and your actions, dear sir, are not much different from those of BNP-Jamat. We will rather wait for the party that truly believes in these progressive ideals rather than support a morally bankrupt party such as yours who just uses these ideals as lip service when it suits them and dumps them before election when they think it’s a liability.
Mr. GS,
Please don’t underestimate the hurt and anguish that has been caused by your action. If you don’t cancel this deal, you will be repaid for your betrayal in kind for a long time to come. You have very little credibility after your April 30th deadline in 2004. In any other country, you would have been thrown into the political dustbin after that monumental political failure. Still it’s a miracle that you lived through that to cause another similar proportion catastrophic failure yesterday by signing this 5 point agreement with a little known fundamentalist Islamist party and effectively stabbed in the back of your party workers and supporters. You owe them an explanation. For a party that regularly tries to milk the liberation war for its own advantage and for a party that got a lot of mileage from the 2001 Hindu oppression and 2005 Ahmediya discrimination, you owe them an explanation for signing a deal that goes completely against your previous political stands. You still have a chance to control the damage by scrapping this deal. If you want to have any shred of political credibility for the future, you will want to scrap this deal. Otherwise, you will not find the friends with you when you need them and believe me you will need friends a lot sooner than you think. Scrap or no scrap, do know this, that from now on we will make it very very expensive for you to take our support for granted.

December 25th, 2006 at 8:05 am
This truly is a sad day for all the progressive and secular people, most of whom HAD been supporting the Awami League for the upcoming elections. I hope Awami League realises that most of these people will not now vote for them if this agreement is not retracted and a credible explanation or apology does not come from the party. Mr. Jalil has let us down badly. He is holding the same post that that once was held by people like Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and later by Tajuddin Ahmed. They must be turning in their graves…
December 25th, 2006 at 11:46 am
Knowing the way AL operates top down, I don’t believe this happened without Sheikh Hasina’s consent. She bears the ultimate responsibility for this pact and I think the letter should have been addressed to her as well.
December 25th, 2006 at 12:20 pm
Asif,
Wow thats a great letter-Congfratulations -question is how will Jalil know about the contents of the letter? Could Jalail have made this decision alone ;without the cncurrence from Hasina?-
Politics is a dirty game–because its main game is Dominance over others and for that they would do anything–unfortunately we elect these Politicians who do some good for records only must Citizen continue to struggle to meet the basic necessities while these Politicians (Goverment n 0pposition) ride is posh cars having BLACK windows to cover their ill-gotten wealth–and we cannot as yet find any alternative. What a Pitiful state???? The new Parties formed have also begun to show their color–ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh POWER POWER POWER WHERE ART THOU??? WE TENDER OUR UNCONDITIONAL LOVE FOR YOU DEAR POWER-MAIRI DIBBI KETE BOLCHI SHUDO TOMAKE TAMAKEYI BHALO BASHI OHHHHHHHHH POWER-
However, after Jalil and his beloved partner the SG of Khateme Majlish see this letter -a FATWA against you might be issued:” ei chiti IBLISH likheje IBLISH ALLAH er sotru,manusher shotru thai ei IBLIshke khotom no korle Bangladesh e IBLISH bhore jabe”–
Anyway if you need any help just send me an email –you will be comfy,cozy at my place-I love good food which you too will enjoy and then we have the German Shepherds to let them loose against those FATABAZis.
December 25th, 2006 at 1:37 pm
Asif,
the open letter format is very useful in talking to everyone else other than Abdul Jalil. did you manage to stick a copy under that dangerous moustache of his.
does this recent step make you and those who think the same way about religion feel politically lonesome?
will a (re)expressedly secular party have any chance of winning a seat and the public confidence? which constitutencies and individuals would you choose?
I really beleve that we need a rearrangement of political camps in bangladesh. wipe the deck clean, lets have new actors without the baggage and be a lot nicer and graceful in expressign diversity of opinion.
December 25th, 2006 at 7:31 pm
The pursuit of power at all costs has made AL and Hasina insane. Even from a tactics point of view this MOU with a bunch third rate thugs in the guise of religious clerics is unbelievably stupid. Let alone Strategy or Ethics!
December 26th, 2006 at 6:34 am
Careful who you slander robin. do you really know that BKM and the hadith scholar are thugs?
Its time to up the quality and ethics of your discourse. Otherwise you will be unsuccesful in voicing your world view and finding a niche in society.
December 26th, 2006 at 7:49 am
Asif bhai, thanks for attaching the copy of the contract. I don’t understand why everyone’s so freaking out.
There’s only one point, No 3 (Kha), which obviously needs to go but others seems absolutely ok!
Weird!
December 26th, 2006 at 8:27 am
‘Its time to up the quality and ethics of your discourse. Otherwise you will be unsuccesful in voicing your world view and finding a niche in society’.
hmmm….and whats your niche? Mouthing Islamic rhetoric and slogans over the net?
Time ppl realised Bangladeshi politics has little to do with ideas and everything to do with POWER.
December 26th, 2006 at 11:32 am
A great post Asif.
Ar Nazzina, if we take secularism and liberty of expression of any values, is it onlye “kha” that disturbs you.
So you you think Rushdie, Taslima and others have ben persecuted for good reason?
Thats unfortunate.
December 26th, 2006 at 12:55 pm
I think couple of points could well be taken to a good direction, like may be banning any defamation of ANY religion’s idol? Making fun of various idols that lead to religious/racial conflicts do not help really. There’s always a limit to tolerance, and people do have limitation when something as sensitive as religions are used to test temper.
To be honest, I don’t see this contract happening in reality. This group got only one nomination from 14-party and they will lost the seat… so the contract will go off then.
I personally think Taslima is quite a psycho but Salman Rushdie was interesting in experessing his thoughts. He had the quality, unlike Taslima.
I was searching blasphemy and checked this wiki info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy. Few countries have law on it including UK.
December 26th, 2006 at 1:35 pm
If we want Honest politics, we should stick to voting for the Islamists. They are honest about what they want, and have a long term vision for our country. Besides, it is time to remove all women from power. As reported on an article about Bangladesh on CNN, these “women are our biggest disasters”.
December 26th, 2006 at 6:31 pm
lanacian,
what sloganeering and rhetoric giri?
come on dude you know its right not to blanket insult people you disagree with. what i do with myself isnt really your concern is it?
honest thoughts,
your anti women with power point sucks, i think its not that they are women, but that they are foolish. continuing on that parochial train of thought will lead us to the same point that we are in now. They must be Bangl/they must be Muslim/they must be male/they must have degrees/they must have never messed up a business deal…/failed a driving test
blasphemy law,
This one is a real can of worms. Would it be a long shot for folks to be able to NOT misunderstand eachother and be respectful of eachothers religious reverence and drawing the best out of one another?
December 27th, 2006 at 4:08 am
Garga Chatterji,
refyr comments sl#9:”So you you think Rushdie, Taslima and others have ben persecuted for good reason?”- it is now acknowledged world-wide they these two have jumped over-board with their extreme idea and languages and therefore their opinions or ideas have no impact whatsoever. But the Khatame Majlish idea about Fatwa can make a impact as has already been wrongly interpreted by the SG of AL in defence:that these educated people will give correct Fatwa and this will stop the Bad Fatwa- The most important point is that in ISLAM there is no provision for Fatwa specially of the type that involves garlanding of a person with shoes and invoking hardship on women but setting the male free or that because one is male he can do whatever he likes or through FATWA ordering to kill some one who may have taken up a different point/stand against wrong etc etc–No one is authorized NOt even the King of Saudi and our Holy Prophet didnt give any Fatwa either.
Fatwa can only be given by Islamic scholars only to clarify certain procedures of Islamic culture like Zakat,Ftra,marriage/divorce etc –only clarify the right method and in grave emergency(When there is no Goverment/Authority to control security etc -they issue certain points based on experience to ask people to refrain from activities like rioting,destruction of life and property so similar–besides this none can.
So this Fatwa that has been going on and specially the recent most pitiful one is totally against ISLAM and the person who gave the Fatwa must be taken into account.
0bviously its the case that the boy is son of some BIG GUY of the locality and because of corrupt police and the area senior Citizens not taking any interest helped the boy to escape–but the girl and father in desolate condition.Can any one today inform what is the latest situation?Whether the Father n girl are alive or have been beaten and left in some remote place to fend for themselves?Wonder why Ain o Salish organization didnt take up the case.Hope you or some one will be able to give the answer.
December 27th, 2006 at 10:21 am
Bangladesh Politics these days are a source of a lot of fun, really.
It is funny to see the so called progressives having to defend fatwa these days….Now we have good fatwa and bad fatwa, educated molla and uneducated molla etc. At this rate, we’ll soon have good rajakar and bad rajakar, good muktijoddah and bad muktijoddah….or may be we already have the good and bad muktijoddah…the ones with AL are good and the ones not with AL are bad muktijoddah…..My dear friends, who gets to decide which is a good fatwa and which is not?
Our political leaders have lost the trait of honesty long time back. In fact, it’s the fact of being dishonest is what they call politics. It seems our progressive, educated, elite-class (buddhizibi) are on their way to becoming politicians by losing their honesty! Or may be it’s something that they never had?
December 27th, 2006 at 10:41 am
Dear Sensible,
that was not a very sensible comment. I don’t know of a single intellectual who defended good vs bad fatwa. Unless you are saying Jalil is an intellectual which he is not. The condemnation of this deal has been swift and unanimous from all spectrum and this includes even die hard Awami Budhdhijibis like Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury and Kabir Chowdhury et al. Please let me know where have you seen intellectuals defending fatwa?
December 27th, 2006 at 10:52 am
Please read the posts in this blog…..you’ll find people trying to clarify the pact (chukti), people talking about only “knowledgable Alems” being allowed to give fatwa, and what not! I have never like Rushdi or Taslima. But there are others who liked them previously and claimed their writings as “freedom of expression”. Now they became extremist in some sense. I have never said all the buddhijibis are saying the same thing. However, sometimes no comments from a person is a big enough comment. I have not seen enough of a protest against this agreement in Bangladesh. I wonder what would have happened if BNP signed a similar pact with this group! Can you imagine the reactions in newspapers, “bibritis” and on the streets? I think I’m right in that at least a portion of “gora” AL supporters are now finding good fatwa’s helpful to the society!
December 27th, 2006 at 2:54 pm
Phantom @ #13: “Fatwa can only be given by Islamic scholars only to clarify certain procedures of Islamic culture like Zakat,Ftra,marriage/divorce etc –only clarify the right method and in grave emergency(When there is no Goverment/Authority to control security etc -they issue certain points based on experience to ask people to refrain from activities like rioting,destruction of life and property”
Absolutely spot on! Fatwa isn’t something negative, but how it is interpreted in our “Islamic” world by few heedless clerics made it something really bad. Giving “darra” like you should be getting 100 whips are completely against the original definition of Fatwa…
December 31st, 2006 at 11:00 am
I look forward to the day when Bengalis in BD and Bangla will conduct their socio-economic affairs without fatwas.
We know that the BNP is politically predictable but the AL is proving to be truely conniving and Machevellian.
The people have a lesson to learn from this, and the lesson is, “never trust a politician to be a saint”, even when they claim to be a do-gooder “liberal”.
January 1st, 2007 at 6:40 pm
3id mubarak
about fatwas.
Theres a phd thesis floating around on ‘fatwa baji’ during the early 80s. its from a deshi university, he tried to trace where certain bizzare rulings came from. suprise suprise there was a lot of ‘fatwa contributions’ from so called avowedly secularist sources.
loopy world.
MD Lodhi, eid mubarak. I dont think bangladeshis of the anti fatwas of all kinds lobby will be able to change basic islamic culture in that way. muslim people will always face moral dillemmas and seek disciplined religious opinions on matters regarding technologies, financing, marital strife and waht not.
January 21st, 2007 at 6:38 am
Shame on you Mr. Asif. I dont know what this little known political party is capable of, however it makes me ponder why you are so saddened by the 5 conditions of this mutual agreement between the two party.
For one it doesnt mention any intent to oppress the religious minorities and i think i must give them credit to have signed the condition which will stop defamation of our Prophet PBUH. AL and Mr. Jalil are more knowledgeable than you which way the tide is turning … so well done Mr. Jalil .. you were forthright in signing this agreement.